Lake Mogan: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 78: Line 78:


==== How do urban and natural structures interact? ====
==== How do urban and natural structures interact? ====
As a result of hard surface constructions and covers, natural drainage system (surface water flow) has negatively affected from
the Project. Therefore, water income to the Lake has decreased.Accordingly, wetland and aquatic ecosystems has degraded; flora and fauna habitats and populations have been degraded by the project.Along the some parts of the Lake shore, marshes have been burned and destroyed to construct a walking path. As a result of this implementation, bird habitats are degraded.
==== What is the role of water? ====
==== What is the role of water? ====



Revision as of 16:54, 16 December 2008

Conflicts among the stakeholders of Lake Mogan Special Protection Area during the conservation

Name Lake Mogan Park
Place Ankara/Gölbası Municipality
Country Turkey
Topic Nature conservation
Author(s) Emel Baylan and Bihter Bingül
Completion 2001
Client Ankara Metropolitan Area Municipality
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Mogan Lake1.jpg
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="39.855992" lon="32.817535" zoom="10" width="300" height="250">

39.757475, 32.791946 Mogan Lake </googlemap>>

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

Lake Mogan and its surrounding is a Special Protected Area (SPA) which is very near to Ankara City centre. It has declared as a protected area because of having rich and internationally important biodiversity and fragile wetland ecosystems. The area is a part of a watershed system in Ankara and it is one of the important natural areas supporting the ecological sustainability of the city.

In 2001, Lake Mogan Park Project has completed and began to serve as a very large recreational area in this protected area. This project has ignored the importance of the biodiversity and the fragile ecosystems of the area.Today, the area is being used only as a recreational area by very different and large user groups. Therefore Lake Mogan and its surrounding has lost nearly all its natural values because of the degradation caused by the Project.

The main problems and the main reasons in this process are conflicts among the stakeholders, lack of coordination&cooperation among planning&administrative institutions of the area and demand based management approaches.

So, this case may be an example for damaging natural areas because of unwise management and short term benefits/objectives.

Author's perspective

  • What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?


Landscape and/or urban context

  • Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Cultural/social/political context

  • Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes

History

  • How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

  • What are the main structural features?
  • How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Core Questions Working Group Nature Conservation / Water

What is the role of user groups?

The user groups of Lake Mogan are;children,young people,middle age people,inhabitants in the Gölbası Municipality and near the Lake shore,inhabitants in the Ankara City, small cafe/restaurant enterprises,fishermen,birdwatchers,scientists.

Most of the users are using the area for recreational purposes. Some of the recreational activities in the Park are; boating, canoeing,horse riding,jogging, open air cinema,picnic,recreative fishing,tennis,tivoli,walking.

Birdwatchers have been doing the bird counting in the area for several years. These activities have contributed to train new birdwatchers and also, to have a bird record for the Lake Mogan and surrounding. Lake Mogan has been used as a case area for various reseaches. These researches have contributed the physical, chemical, biological and social data base of the area. Therefore, both birdwatchers and scientists have an essential role for the conservation and wise management of Lake Mogan. Although this is not the case for the area in the real, these users develop a potential for the conservation of the area.

What is the role of the city?

Ankara City in which Lake Mogan located is the capital of Turkey. Its population is nearly 5 million people but the existing open-green spaces are not sufficient for the increasing demand of inhabitants to these areas. So, Lake Mogan Project was developed to meet this requirement of the city. Because the Lake and near surrounding has various natural potentials for recreation. Currently this natural area is under pressure of a large user group coming mainly from Ankara and wide range of activities and land uses in the Park area and near. Some of the other important factors which negatively affecting the natural area are dense highway traffic, lack of infrastracture (sewerage system)in second house settlements and in small enterprises (such as restaurant, cafe...)

How do urban and natural structures interact?

As a result of hard surface constructions and covers, natural drainage system (surface water flow) has negatively affected from the Project. Therefore, water income to the Lake has decreased.Accordingly, wetland and aquatic ecosystems has degraded; flora and fauna habitats and populations have been degraded by the project.Along the some parts of the Lake shore, marshes have been burned and destroyed to construct a walking path. As a result of this implementation, bird habitats are degraded.

What is the role of water?

The Lake and its surrounding has always been a favorite natural area for Ankara city. In the Lake Mogan Park, water is the main element that shapes the project decision, project design and implementation. Furthermore, water; Lake Mogan is essential for the sustainability of the project.

What is the evolution of the urban relation between humans and nature?

2001 Ankara Municipality

Lake Mogan and its surrounding is a Special Protected Area (SPA) which is very near to Ankara City centre. It has declared as a protected area because of having rich and internationally important biodiversity and fragile wetland ecosystems. The area is a part of a watershed system in Ankara and it is one of the important natural areas supporting the ecological sustainability of the city. In 2001, Lake Mogan Park Project has completed and began to serve as a very large recreational area in this protected area. This project has ignored the importance of the biodiversity and the fragile ecosystems of the area. Today, the area is being used only as a recreational area by very different and large user groups. Therefore Lake Mogan and its surrounding has lost nearly all its natural values because of the degradation caused by the Project. So, this case may be an example for damaging natural areas because of unwise management and short term benefits/objectives.

Analysis of program/function

  • What are the main functional characteristics?
  • How have they been expressed or incorporated?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

  • How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
  • Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

  • How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
  • Is the use changing? Are there any issues?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Future development directions

  • How is the area/project/plan evolving?
  • Are there any future goals?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

  • Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
  • What were their main evaluations?

Pleas add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

  • What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?

Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

  • Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Which research questions does it generate?

Short statement plus background notes

Image Gallery

References

Please add literature, documentations and weblinks


About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories