Working Group Landscape Development in Peri-urban Landscapes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Heike.kaiser (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Rationales:Why are these case studies interesting? === | === Rationales:Why are these case studies interesting? === | ||
<DPL> | <DPL> | ||
Evaluation of the green system of Istanbul and improving proposals �to revitalize the green corridors at metropolitan scale. | |||
category=WG Landscape Development in Peri-urban Landscapes | category=WG Landscape Development in Peri-urban Landscapes | ||
mode=ordered | mode=ordered | ||
include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? | include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? | ||
</DPL> | </DPL> | ||
=== The Landscape Context === | === The Landscape Context === | ||
<DPL> | <DPL> |
Revision as of 17:35, 2 June 2009
-> Back to Working Groups Rural Landscapes
Case Studies of this working group
Attention: These are 2 dynamic page lists, do not edit this paragraph as it is created automatically. Text added to the first two chapters of your case study pages will automatically appear here.
Rationales:Why are these case studies interesting?
<DPL> Evaluation of the green system of Istanbul and improving proposals �to revitalize the green corridors at metropolitan scale.
category=WG Landscape Development in Peri-urban Landscapes mode=ordered include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?
</DPL>
The Landscape Context
<DPL>
category=WG Landscape Development in Peri-urban Landscapes mode=ordered include = #Landscape and/or urban context
</DPL> Back to top
Cross-Cutting Questions of this Working Group
Please list the cross-cutting questions identified during group discussion.
Synthesis of core questions
The synthesis will evolve at the end of the seminar
Minutes of this Working Group
Please add the minutes of your group discussions