Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
=== Who was involved in the participation process? ===
=== Who was involved in the participation process? ===
Agnieska , Harun
Agnieska , Harun
==== Answers of the Case Studies ====
<DPL>
<DPL>
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
Line 38: Line 39:
=== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ===
=== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ===
Camilo, Andrew
Camilo, Andrew
 
==== Answers of the Case Studies ====
<DPL>
<DPL>
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
Line 107: Line 108:
=== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?===
=== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?===
Liliana, Martina
Liliana, Martina
 
==== Answers of the Case Studies ====
<DPL>
<DPL>
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
   category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity

Revision as of 12:26, 12 January 2009

Case Studies of this working group

The list includes all case studies categorised in this group and the respective answers to the first question "Rationale:Why is this case study interesting?"

Attention: this is a dynamic page list, do not edit this paragraph!

<DPL>

 category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
 mode=ordered
 include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

</DPL> Back to top

Core Questions of this Working Group

Core questions as identified during the first group meeting on December 3rd 2008:

  1. Who was involved in the participation process? (Agnieska, Harun)
  2. How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? (Camilo, Andrew)
  3. In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? (Liliana, Martina)

Notes:

  • The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate all questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th.
  • People who did not attend the session on 3rd of December may have additional proposals for core questions. Feel free to add these questions as proposals to the list above and discuss it via e-mail or using the discussion page.
  • Please integrate the questions soon and try to deliver some draft answers before December 15th - otherwise it will become difficult to create a synthesis report for December 17th.

Back to top

Synthesis of Core Questions

Who was involved in the participation process?

Agnieska , Harun

Answers of the Case Studies

<DPL>

 category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
 mode=ordered
 include = #Who was involved in the participation process?

</DPL> Back to top

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

Camilo, Andrew

Answers of the Case Studies

<DPL>

 category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
 mode=ordered
 include = #How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

</DPL>

Synthesis

Budapest-Józsefváros Medellin Parks in Neu Oerlikon Paseo del Buen Pastor Petuelpark Suleymaniye Regeneration Area Uggledal
Initiation Leaflets and local press – for promotion of process, Kick off meeting,Questionnaire Public meetings - socialising and promoting the project and its process, Quantitative and qualitative surveys, Workshops and field visits (officials & community leaders) Questionnaire in local newspaper and to people using the space, general, open questions specific and limited questionnaire
Plan Open meetings, surveys and interviews undertaken by students Workshops – public, local officials, artist and professionals, interdisciplinary work Workshops - women groups, professionals, school children- (formulated plan of area), Meetings – citizen groups
Design Presentation of plan based on above material, vote on material to be constructed Workshops to design the use and characteristics of the public spaces (community in general), review of the designs (officials & community leaders). General workshops,specific workshops (children, disabled), interdisciplinary Workshops - women groups, professionals, school children, meetings – citizen groups
Implementation Design and realisation of sitting-hills (schools, students, NGO’s), Public planting in the square Local, community press and billboards informing about the projects, Labour force for the construction of the projects was mainly from the community Artist collaboration
Maintenance Delegation of tasks to communities and institutions (in process) Delegation of tasks to community and institutions, social programs and community activities have been established in the projects Maintenance of several communal areas is responsibility of community groups


Concluding thoughts:

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...

Back to top

In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?

Liliana, Martina

Answers of the Case Studies

<DPL>

 category=Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity
 mode=ordered
 include = #In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?

</DPL> Back to top

Working Group Minutes

First Group Meeting