Future Landscapes Group 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: --> Back to overview of assignment 3 == Case Studies == === Case Study Clemson 3 === === Case Study IMLA 1 === == Comparative Analysis == ===...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Case Studies == | == Case Studies == | ||
=== [[Case Study Clemson 3]] === | === [[Case Study Clemson 3]] === | ||
=== [[Case Study | === [[Case Study Nürtingen 1]] === | ||
== Comparative Analysis == | == Comparative Analysis == | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 11 November 2010
--> Back to overview of assignment 3
Case Studies
Case Study Clemson 3
Case Study Nürtingen 1
Comparative Analysis
Core Questions
Attention: this is a dynamic page list, the answers written in your case studies will appear automatically here. Do not edit this second paragraph.
In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?
<DPL>
category=Future Landscapes Group 3 Case Study mode=ordered include = #In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?
</DPL>
What is the role of landscape architecture in this respect?
<DPL>
category=Future Landscapes Group 3 Case Study mode=ordered include = #What is the role of landscape architecture in this respect?
</DPL>
Synthesis and Outlook
please write your thoughts here, you may add concept maps and sketches.