Regeneration of Don River in Toronto, Canada: Difference between revisions
Baisarchana (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Baisarchana (talk | contribs) |
||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List] | back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List] | ||
{| align=" | {| align="none" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Restoration of Don river'' | | '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Restoration of Don river'' | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? === | === Rationale: Why is this case interesting? === | ||
This case is interesting because of the following reasons: | '''This case is interesting because of the following reasons:''' | ||
''' | '''.''' This case is the unique example of ability to unite and co-ordinate local and regional interests. Each community is fired by emotional attachment to its own stretch of river and inspired by the possibility for environmental renewal. Through active public participation and transcending arbitrary political boundaries, the city council is able to facilitate the transformation of local passion in to actions across entire watershed. | ||
''' | '''.''' Public participation is not limited to solicitation. Public is an active contributor to implementation as well. Right from boy scouts to senior citizens, varied groups of people are active participants in the process. | ||
''' | '''.''' This case is also a great example of social education i e. learning by doing. | ||
It is a collective effort to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the water in the river. | It is a collective effort to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the water in the river. | ||
=== Author's personal background === | === Author's personal background === | ||
Bachelors in Architecture (B.Arch) from MITS Gwalior, India with over seven years of | Bachelors in Architecture (B.Arch) with a major in Landscape from MITS Gwalior, India with over seven years of international work experience in structures, conservation and landscape. Member of Council of Architecture (COA), India and Association of Architects (AOA), India. Also worked as guest Faculty of Interior Design at Government Women Polytechnic College, Gwalior, India and NIFD, India. | ||
Studied one year of Masters of Landscape Architecture in the University of Toronto. Currently studying in first semester of IMLA (International Masters in Landscape Architecture) and working with bof architektin and IMS engineers in Hamburg, Germany. | |||
=== Process Biography Scheme === | === Process Biography Scheme === | ||
[[Image:Presentation1.jpg|Process biography example|900px]] | [[Image:Presentation1.jpg|Process biography example|900px]] | ||
| Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
=== When was public participation most intensive? === | === When was public participation most intensive? === | ||
Public participation gathered steam in 1989 with a public forum at Ontario's science centre which was attended by 500 people and resulted in the formation of '''Task Force to Bring back the Don''', a citizen advisory body to Toronto City Council. Since then it is the most active organization in this project. | Public participation gathered steam in 1989 with a public forum at Ontario's science centre which was attended by 500 people and resulted in the formation of '''Task Force to Bring back the Don''', a citizen advisory body to Toronto City Council. Since then it is the most active organization in this project. Up till now, an estimated 10,000 Toronto citizens have participated in the Task Force to Bring Back the Don restoration activities. | ||
=== Which participation tools have been applied? === | === Which participation tools have been applied? === | ||
| Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
==== On which level of participation? ==== | ==== On which level of participation? ==== | ||
Extensive research, information sessions during, Marketing campaign (bi-annual newsletters, brochures, online blogs and sites '''Co-Knowing''' | |||
Workshops, Advisory group meetings, Public meetings, Information seminars, Surveys and mapping, Site visits during, Online blogs and sites (with feedback function) '''Co-Thinking''' | |||
Eco-schools, Pilot education programs, Demonstration projects, Park stewardship programs and Experiential learning during '''Co-Operating''' and '''Co-Deciding''' | |||
=== Which stakeholders have been involved? === | === Which stakeholders have been involved? === | ||
Stakeholders involved: | Stakeholders involved: | ||
'''International Bodies:''' | |||
· '''US and Canada Government''' - GLWQA (Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement | |||
'''State Bodies:''' | '''State Bodies:''' | ||
· Federal - COA | · '''Federal''' - COA (Canada Ontario Agreement) | ||
· Provincial - Toronto city council | · '''Provincial''' - Toronto city council | ||
· Toronto and Region conservation authority (TRCA) | · '''Municipal''' - Toronto and Region conservation authority (TRCA), Don Watershed Regeneration Council (DWRC) | ||
'''Volunteer Groups:''' | '''Volunteer Groups:''' | ||
| Line 78: | Line 82: | ||
'''Professional''' | '''Professional''' | ||
· Technological consultants | · Technological consultants | ||
· Urban Planners | |||
· Environmentalists | · Environmentalists | ||
· Landscape architects | · Landscape architects | ||
| Line 87: | Line 92: | ||
Following major decisions were made: | Following major decisions were made: | ||
'''Apr 1989''' – '''Toronto city council''' formed the Task Force to Bring Back the Don | '''1959''' – '''Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)''' formed flood control and water conservation plan | ||
'''1969''' – '''Pollution Probe''' Funeral for the Don | |||
'''Apr 1989''' – '''Toronto city council''' formed the Task Force (Citizen advisory body to the Council) to Bring Back the Don | |||
'''May 1989''' – '''The Task Force''' created their first proposal | '''May 1989''' – '''The Task Force''' created their first proposal | ||
| Line 93: | Line 102: | ||
'''Aug 1991''' – '''The Task Force''' finalized their "Bring back the Don" proposal | '''Aug 1991''' – '''The Task Force''' finalized their "Bring back the Don" proposal | ||
''' | '''1994''' – '''40 Steps to Don''' Don watershed regeneration council (DWRC) | ||
'''2000''' - '''Task Force''' started Community Stewardship Program | |||
| Line 102: | Line 113: | ||
<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3"> | <gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3"> | ||
Image:CNSPhoto-WeeklyFeature Dec.jpg|Don river | Image:Swimming.JPG|Fondly remembered as "'''Bare ass beac'''h" | ||
Image:CNSPhoto-WeeklyFeature Dec.jpg|Don river degradation | |||
Image:C Users Katto AppData Local Temp npsE487.jpg|River watershed regeneration plan | Image:C Users Katto AppData Local Temp npsE487.jpg|River watershed regeneration plan | ||
Image:Pic 0035 800.jpg|Tree plantations | Image:Pic 0035 800.jpg|Tree plantations - Volunteers have planted over 25,000 trees and shrubs | ||
Image:Pic 0034 800.jpg|Removing the invasives | Image:Pic 0034 800.jpg|Removing the invasives | ||
Image:Don | Image:Don Project Large.jpg-.jpg|Don river - future projected image | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
| Line 113: | Line 125: | ||
=== References === | === References === | ||
http://www.toronto.ca/don/watershed.htm | |||
http://www.mwilson.on.ca/don.html | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 3 February 2010
by Archana
back to Project Biography List
| Name | Restoration of Don river | |
| Place | Toronto | |
| Country | Canada | |
| Author(s) | Archana Bais | |
| Completion | On going project | |
| Client | Toronto City Council | |
| Project costs | N.A. | |
| ||
Rationale: Why is this case interesting?
This case is interesting because of the following reasons:
. This case is the unique example of ability to unite and co-ordinate local and regional interests. Each community is fired by emotional attachment to its own stretch of river and inspired by the possibility for environmental renewal. Through active public participation and transcending arbitrary political boundaries, the city council is able to facilitate the transformation of local passion in to actions across entire watershed.
. Public participation is not limited to solicitation. Public is an active contributor to implementation as well. Right from boy scouts to senior citizens, varied groups of people are active participants in the process.
. This case is also a great example of social education i e. learning by doing. It is a collective effort to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the water in the river.
Author's personal background
Bachelors in Architecture (B.Arch) with a major in Landscape from MITS Gwalior, India with over seven years of international work experience in structures, conservation and landscape. Member of Council of Architecture (COA), India and Association of Architects (AOA), India. Also worked as guest Faculty of Interior Design at Government Women Polytechnic College, Gwalior, India and NIFD, India. Studied one year of Masters of Landscape Architecture in the University of Toronto. Currently studying in first semester of IMLA (International Masters in Landscape Architecture) and working with bof architektin and IMS engineers in Hamburg, Germany.
Process Biography Scheme
Who initiated the project and why?
City of Toronto initiated the project in 1989. The Don River Watershed is one of the great natural resources in the metropolitan Toronto area. The valley lands create a stretch of green space in the most urbanized area of Canada. The river is 38-km long, it flows into Toronto Bay and Lake Ontario. The entire watershed, or drainage basin, of the Don River is 360 sq km. Approximately 800,000 people live in the watershed making the Don Canada's most urban river. For 200 years, like many urban rivers, the Don has suffered the impacts of urbanization, which resulted in increased pollution, heavy flooding and turbid sediment laden waters. By the second half of 20th century wildlife population was in sharp decline and many species had disappeared, recognizing these challenges, Toronto City Council initiated this project.
When was public participation most intensive?
Public participation gathered steam in 1989 with a public forum at Ontario's science centre which was attended by 500 people and resulted in the formation of Task Force to Bring back the Don, a citizen advisory body to Toronto City Council. Since then it is the most active organization in this project. Up till now, an estimated 10,000 Toronto citizens have participated in the Task Force to Bring Back the Don restoration activities.
Which participation tools have been applied?
Extensive research, surveys and mapping, site visits, workshops, seminars, marketing campaign (bi-annual newsletters, brochures), eco-schools, pilot education programs, demonstration projects, park stewardship programs and experiential learning. Almost all tools were used at some point in the past 17 years.
On which level of participation?
Extensive research, information sessions during, Marketing campaign (bi-annual newsletters, brochures, online blogs and sites Co-Knowing
Workshops, Advisory group meetings, Public meetings, Information seminars, Surveys and mapping, Site visits during, Online blogs and sites (with feedback function) Co-Thinking
Eco-schools, Pilot education programs, Demonstration projects, Park stewardship programs and Experiential learning during Co-Operating and Co-Deciding
Which stakeholders have been involved?
Stakeholders involved:
International Bodies: · US and Canada Government - GLWQA (Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
State Bodies: · Federal - COA (Canada Ontario Agreement) · Provincial - Toronto city council · Municipal - Toronto and Region conservation authority (TRCA), Don Watershed Regeneration Council (DWRC)
Volunteer Groups: · Municipal - Municipal councilors · Representatives from various public interests groups · Residents · Different business groups
Professional · Technological consultants · Urban Planners · Environmentalists · Landscape architects
Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public?
There are many annual festivities organized from time to time to involve, inform and educate the community like Richmond Hill Mill Pond splash , Paddle the Don, bike or walk the Don, Tree planting day etc. In 1999, the Task Force celebrated its tenth anniversary with a “Bring Back the Don Day” to mark successes and invite more citizens to see the value of the river as a commons. The event, which included a guided commuter-train tour of the valley, a boat tour, and visits to many of the successfully restored sites along the Don, drew 1,200 citizens and was covered by the major media of the city.
Who made the major decisions and when?
Following major decisions were made:
1959 – Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) formed flood control and water conservation plan
1969 – Pollution Probe Funeral for the Don
Apr 1989 – Toronto city council formed the Task Force (Citizen advisory body to the Council) to Bring Back the Don
May 1989 – The Task Force created their first proposal
Aug 1991 – The Task Force finalized their "Bring back the Don" proposal
1994 – 40 Steps to Don Don watershed regeneration council (DWRC)
2000 - Task Force started Community Stewardship Program
Image Gallery
Fondly remembered as "Bare ass beach"
Don river degradation
River watershed regeneration plan
Tree plantations - Volunteers have planted over 25,000 trees and shrubs
Removing the invasives
Don river - future projected image
References
http://www.toronto.ca/don/watershed.htm
http://www.mwilson.on.ca/don.html
back to Project Biography List