Rosia Montana: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Rosia Montana, Transsylvania, Romania by Oana Baloi  
'''Rosia Montana, Transsylvania, Romania''' by ''Oana Baloi''
 
--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]  
--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]  


Line 33: Line 34:
=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===   
=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===   


This case presents the economical issues that affect nature, lanscape and people. It is a sugestion of other way of developing in in comunity interes.
This case presents the economical issues that affect nature, lanscape and people. It is a sugestion of other way of rural development in a comunity of "gloden interes".


There are real eveniments that happend. It is a good example of "do not". Even if surface minier exploatation is an very oboious danger, unfortunately the economical interes coveres the environmental impact.
There are real events that happend. It is a good example of "do not". Even if surface minier exploatation is an very obvious danger, unfortunately the economical interes coveres the environmental impact.


=== Author's perspective ===
=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please answer from your '''personal''' perspective.
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please answer from your '''personal''' perspective.
As a mountain rural landscape, Rosia Montana has many opportunities for curtural tourism. I now a song that sed: "we are borne with nothing, we die with a lot of love, everything else is just borrowed". When you borrow something you take care of it and use it properly. I now we can use Rosia Montana landscapes to promote natural beautiness, and also to promote domanins of creativity as land art for example.


=== Landscape and/or urban context===
=== Landscape and/or urban context===
Line 84: Line 87:
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Cross-cutting questions ===
==== Why is participation important? ====
==== In which ways does tourism effect on the local identity? ====
==== Which are the mutual influences for protected areas and cultural landscapes and tourism and how can they coexist? ====
==== What are the tasks of the management? ====


=== Future development directions ===
=== Future development directions ===
Line 125: Line 140:


----
----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Designated and Protected Landscapes]]
[[Category: Designated and Protected Landscapes]]

Latest revision as of 17:21, 15 February 2010

Rosia Montana, Transsylvania, Romania by Oana Baloi

--> Back to Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List


Name Rosia Montana
Location Rosia Montana - Transilvania
Country Romania
Topic please enter the topic here
Office office or planner/designer
Client please enter the client here
Completion Please enter the date of completion
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Case study author(s) Oana Baloi
Projectimage.jpg
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="46.333654" lon="23.389893" zoom="9" width="300" height="250">

</googlemap>

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

This case presents the economical issues that affect nature, lanscape and people. It is a sugestion of other way of rural development in a comunity of "gloden interes".

There are real events that happend. It is a good example of "do not". Even if surface minier exploatation is an very obvious danger, unfortunately the economical interes coveres the environmental impact.

Author's perspective

  • What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please answer from your personal perspective.

As a mountain rural landscape, Rosia Montana has many opportunities for curtural tourism. I now a song that sed: "we are borne with nothing, we die with a lot of love, everything else is just borrowed". When you borrow something you take care of it and use it properly. I now we can use Rosia Montana landscapes to promote natural beautiness, and also to promote domanins of creativity as land art for example.

Landscape and/or urban context

  • Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

The village of Rosia Montana contains hundreds of households, a historical centre with beautiful architecture, various administrative and social-cultural buildings, memorial houses, a mining museum with a unique collection of ancient artifacts, an archaeological reservation and many geological wonders and the incredible deep roots of our history. Many local activities activities started to stagnate in 2002, when Gabriel Resources changed the land use plans and turned Rosia Montana into an industrial area; exclusively reserved for the mine proposal. They put in danger 5 mountains�a unic national patrimony�, 10 churches, 9 cemeterys,�958 households = 2150 people Rosia Montana trough all his natural riches has a big capability of developing, putting in value all the lanscapes, traditions and the inheritances got from ancient times.

Servus Oana - Salutari din partea bucurestenilor. Iti uram multa bafta cu proiectul tau.

Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Cultural/social/political context

  • Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes

History

  • How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

  • What are the main structural features?
  • How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of program/function

  • What are the main functional characteristics?
  • How have they been expressed or incorporated?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

  • How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
  • Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

  • How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
  • Is the use changing? Are there any issues?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes


Cross-cutting questions

Why is participation important?

In which ways does tourism effect on the local identity?

Which are the mutual influences for protected areas and cultural landscapes and tourism and how can they coexist?

What are the tasks of the management?

Future development directions

  • How is the area/project/plan evolving?
  • Are there any future goals?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

  • Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
  • What were their main evaluations?

Pleas add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

  • What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?

Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

  • Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Which research questions does it generate?

Short statement plus background notes

Image Gallery

References

Please add literature, documentations and weblinks


About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "", add your categories