Future Landscapes Group 3: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
</DPL>
</DPL>


[[Image:|center|frame]]== Comparative Analysis ==
== Comparative Analysis ==
*Which major similarities and differences could you identify in those two case studies?
=== Which major similarities and differences could you identify in those two case studies? ===
Image: Highline.jpg
[[Image: Highline.jpg|700px]]
''Please write your thoughts here''


== Synthesis and Outlook ==
== Synthesis and Outlook ==
=== Images ===
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">


Image:Highline.jpg
'''Nürtingen'''
 
'''Project  Differences'''
 
There are differences between Buffalo Bayou and Highline project, that have to do mainly with the nature of both cities while Highline was an area in the city, Buffalo Bayou was a natural area but it was neglected.But there are important similarities, such as the both projects restructure the use of areas for the people.
The idea of just pedestrian areas is not new but in both cases they are used at the maximum, promoting the use of areas exclusively for people.
 
'''Cases study'''
 
Both of the case studies show how an area can be re-used for better, the implementation of the selected projects shows how an abandoned area is possible, there is a difference of scale and a different landscape in both projects,in the case of Bayou, the most idea is that of a nature area that was already there can be used in the benefit of the population, in the case of Highline is the city which opens allows to a project like that be successful.
 
'''Future Landscape'''
 
These different projects are examples of how in the future landscapes in cities can evolve.This project is a good example for how to create multi-purpose, useful places with interdisciplinary work.
 
<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:Buffalo1-1.jpg
Image:Buffalo2-2.jpg
Image:Buffalo3-3.jpg
Image:Buffalo4-4.jpg
Image:Concept_Highline.jpg|Concept Map about Highline
</gallery>
 
== Presentation ==
 
You can find the presentation slides by the Clemson 3 - Nürtingen 1 Group '''[http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/94/Assignment_3_-_Additional_Data/Presentation_Slides_Assignment_3/2_Clemson_IMLA.pdf here]'''.


[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]
[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]


[[Category:Assignment Future Landscapes]]
[[Category:Assignment Future Landscapes]]

Latest revision as of 14:06, 1 December 2010

--> Back to overview of assignment 3


Case Studies

Case Study Clemson 3

Case Study Nürtingen 1

Core Questions

Attention: this is a dynamic page list, the answers written in your case studies will appear automatically here. Do not edit this second paragraph.

In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?

<DPL>

 category=Future Landscapes Group 3 Case Study
 mode=ordered
 include = #Core Question 1: In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?

</DPL>

What is the role of landscape architecture in this project?

<DPL>

 category=Future Landscapes Group 3 Case Study
 mode=ordered
 include = #Core Question 2: What is the role of landscape architecture in this project?

</DPL>

Comparative Analysis

Which major similarities and differences could you identify in those two case studies?

Highline.jpg

Synthesis and Outlook

Nürtingen

Project Differences

There are differences between Buffalo Bayou and Highline project, that have to do mainly with the nature of both cities while Highline was an area in the city, Buffalo Bayou was a natural area but it was neglected.But there are important similarities, such as the both projects restructure the use of areas for the people. The idea of just pedestrian areas is not new but in both cases they are used at the maximum, promoting the use of areas exclusively for people.

Cases study

Both of the case studies show how an area can be re-used for better, the implementation of the selected projects shows how an abandoned area is possible, there is a difference of scale and a different landscape in both projects,in the case of Bayou, the most idea is that of a nature area that was already there can be used in the benefit of the population, in the case of Highline is the city which opens allows to a project like that be successful.

Future Landscape

These different projects are examples of how in the future landscapes in cities can evolve.This project is a good example for how to create multi-purpose, useful places with interdisciplinary work.

Presentation

You can find the presentation slides by the Clemson 3 - Nürtingen 1 Group here.

Back to top