Budapest-Józsefváros

Regeneration Program in Budapest - Józsefváros

Renewal of retarded urban district with the involvement of the residents

Name	Magdolna Quarter Program of larger Regeneration Program in Budapest - Józsefváros
Place	Budapest - Józsefváros
Country	Hungary
Topic	Complicity and participatory in regeneration of poor areas of the city
Author(s)	Agnieszka Górniak
Completion	Please enter the date of completion
Client	Please enter the client
Project costs	the total budget of pilot phase 3.1 m
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="47.490761" lon="19.066429" type="satellite" zoom="13" width="300" height="250"> 47.492343, 19.079994 Budapest-Józsefváros, Mátyás tér </googlemap>

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

The Magdolna Quarter Program (Budapest – Józsefváros) is the first trial in Hungary to implement renewal of multiple retarded urban district with the involvement of the residents including integrated social, cultural and technical measures. It is a significant new initiative in the annals of urban planning in Budapest because it takes under consideration all three fields of urbanity – society, economy and environment and especially because it includes the intensive social involvement in the process of urban development of this area. The implementation of the spatial planning aims is difficult in the Magdolna Quarter because of extreme in the scale of the city social and economical problems there and the achievement of the urban landscape assumptions calls for complex, integrated acting in several fields in the same time.

In the frame of this program have been realized two public spots that deserve a special attention. The projects of ‘the building renewal by involvement of the tenants’ and ‘the renowal of Mátyás square’ are a good practice of social inclusion in all the phases of urban development process, since the moment of planning until the realization of the particular projects. Here the fact of involvement of the local society in design of the public areas is not merely the urban landscape issue but has also the educational, economical, crime prevention and social awareness building aspects.

The most interesting in those projects is the complexity of urban planning and the way of involving the problematic and socially disable community in urban landscape development and designing of the public spaces. The Magdolna Quarter Program express the interactions between urban landscape and society and help to understand the variety of needs of target groups when designing public spaces.

Author's perspective

There are many similar towns, especially located in East Europe, that struggle with problems of stagnate development of the poorest areas. This is of particular importance in case of these deteriorating cities or city quarters, which are depended on incomes of local society and entrepreneurs, and which slowly became the social and economical ‘bankrupts’ being unable to make itself a step ahead. The Budapest case is an interesting example of regenerating of city quarter by simultaneous development of its economy, spatial structure and social involvement.

I had an occasion to observe the development of Magdolna Quarter Program and the implementation of one of the public spaces there by participating in EU - financed project 'GreenKeys- Urban Green as a Key for Sustainable Cities', in which the Matyas Square have been a sample area of new Urban Green Strategy.

The aims and contents of the Program

The most important of this program is to introduce new model of urban rehabilitation scheme in Hungary where the local society of the area is actively involved in all the elements of the program. It should be kind of catalyst for public initiatives and motivate both local authorities and society to self improvement of the quality of live in problematic districts.

The Magdolna Quarter Program based on 3 general aims:

social – to improve the standard of living by ensuring appropriate living conditions, involvement of current residents, strengthening the local community cohesion and retaining the social diversity.

economical – to improve the earning production and self-reliance of the area, development of the local labour market and reduction of unemployment.

environmental – to enlarge the public and green areas both by size and quality, creating sustainable living environment by successive renovation of old buildings and retaining of architectural values of the new ones.

Contest of the program:

Program #1 – Building renewal by involvement of the tenants.

Program #2 – Greenkeys project – Renowal of the Mátyás square.

Program #3 – Mátyás Square Community House ‘Glove Factory’.

Program #4 – Education Program.

Program #5 – Crime prevention program.

Program #6 – Employment, entrepreneus program.

Program #7 – Community development program.

Landscape and/or urban context

The general purpose of the Magdolna Quarter Program is to introduce an urban rehabilitation scheme in Hungary where all program elements are built upon the active involvement of those living in the quarter. It should act as a catalyst for the public initiatives and thereby create a unique shaped and attractive part of the city with creating new public and cultural spots and renewal of existing ones.

Besides the social and economical improvements the Program aims at enlargement of public and green areas both by size and quality, creating sustainable living environment by continuous renewal of buildings in small steps, by retaining the architectural values and building new houses.

Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Cultural/social/political context

• Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

In the Magdolna Quarter the families in disadvantageous position are living in a concentrated pattern with over-representation of Romany families. The unemployment rate is equally the highest there all over Budapest and the proportion of economically active population is the lowest. The blocking in terms of education is also the highest: proportion of people without primary school qualification is high and the number of those having university grade is low. As regard to the economic potential and employment position of the quarter this is one of the weakest areas in the city. The number of criminal acts is high in spite of the improving public security. Another serious problem is a use of and trading with drugs as well as the prostitution having considerable historical heritage even if it has practically ceased to exist in public areas. The local community provides a more acceptant medium for the people disabled due to their physical or mental state or disqualified due to their ethic relations as well as for the Hungarian and non-Hungarian immigrants. The ratio of small area flats without any comfort is high in the outdated composition and extraordinarily bad state flat stock. Due to the permanent worsening of physical state and downward moving social spiral the quarter of the city being of the quarter of poor people is steadily detaching from the rest of the district. There is still a thin middle class group in the quarter that did not want or was unable to move from this part of the city and could be more easily mobilized than the people of the poorest families. The key task of this program is to retain and to strengthen this thin group as possible.

Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes

History

• How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

• What are the main structural features?
• How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity

Who was involved in the participation process?

The Magdolna Quarter Program is a part of larger Regeneration Program in Budapest – Józsefváros. The key words of this program is cooperation and participation, so it contains many players in each phase of its realization. In the frame of this program have been already renovated Mátyás square that involved many diversified participants.

Players in different parts of project implementation:

1. Initiation of the program: - Municipality of Budapest - Local Government of Józsefváros

2. The preparatory of the project (planning, analyzing, designing) - Geographical Research Institute of Hungarian Academy of Science GRI HAS - Rév8 - Urban Renewal and Development of Józsefváros PLC - Budapest Corvinus University - Local society: inhabitants of the quarter – mostly of Local Government owned rental houses (42% of total house ownerships of the district), the Erdélyi Elementary and Secondary School ( teachers and the pupils), local NGO’s, students of the Budapest Corvinus University

3. Financial participation: City of Budapest, Local Government of Józsefváros, EU institutes in a frame of INTERREG III B program, project GreenKeys- Urban Green as a Key for Sustainable Cities.

4. Maintenance of realized project: Local Government with participation of local society.

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

There have been applied several methods of public participation in different part of the regeneration program. The complicity of local society in all aspects and all phases of program implementation have been taken as priority for whole the program. In the case study of Magdolna Quarter Program is analyzed mainly the its part of participative renewal of building and public spaces in the first phase of programs run. Below it is describe the schedule of renewal of Mátyás Square – the biggest open public in Magdolna Quarter. For all the building and open space removal have been used similar method of public involvement. The preparation and the implementation phases of the pilot project have been achieved from 2005 until March 2008, including the public discussions on demands and expectations of local residents. However the involvement of residents have been more successful in implementation that in preparatory part. It took long time to build the awareness of real needs and possibilities of improvement and catalyst initiatives.

Planning and design phase:

The activities between organizers and local society began in October 2005. It have been launched by distributing colorful leaflets and organizing the first “kick-off” meeting for the residents. Two further meetings with the public were held a few months later in February and March 2006. All of them had been announced in the local newspaper. Besides these a survey was carried out in the period of the end of 2005 and the beginning of 2006. The results of the survey have been analyzed by one of the Institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. One of the most important information from both the public consultations and the survey was that 80% of the affected public would happily participate in the implementation as well as in the maintenance phase. In March 2006 have been invited to the program the Corvinus University to cooperate in with District in the planning and implementation of the project. Based on the comments and demands of the local inhabitants, three different concepts were developed that were presented at the next meeting of professionals and the public participants later in March. Planning was carried out in evidence–students came around, carried out research on the role and history of Mátyás square, made interviews with local inhabitants. At the end, based on the comments received in March, one final plan was developed and presented to the public in May. The presentation was organized in the framework of an open-air gathering, demo and communication materials were widely applied. The inhabitants could also vote for the materials that would be built in the square.

Implementation:

The implementation activity was divided into two parts. The first stage started in December 2006 with designing so-called sitting-hills for the square as an alternative to benches. Pupils of one of the schools of Magdolna Quarter, local NGO’s and students of the Corvinus University were participated in this design and later in realizing in spring 2007. By the mid of April 2007, the new structures (pathways, main green spot, etc.) were also established. The second phase was the establishing a new playground and fences, new public lighting and security service. New plants were placed on the square by residents, politicians and NGO’s during two days of voluntary work in autumn 2007.

Maintenance. The Rév8 and GRI HAS - organizations responsible for implementation of the project -would like to extend the public participation methods to the maintenance activities as well. Several local meetings have been already organized in connection with the role of potential stakeholders in the maintenance period. It is in progress to delegate the different tasks for the local institutes and communities.

In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?

The local society have been involved in all the phases of implementation of the project, so the requests from locals have been all the time considered as the priority. Firstly, the survey have been carried out and detail analyzed. From the survey came the message that the majority of responders wish to participate in both implementation and maintenance part of the project. So based on this request they have been invited to designing workshops with local professionals. The final version of the design have been consulted during a few public open meetings and finally the inhabitants have been also voting on building materials that were going to be used in the square. In the realization phase of the project the residents in different age have been participating and voluntary planting the plants or installing the equipments with professionals. Of course not everybody from locals have been satisfied with created solutions but the conclusions have been made based on democratic voting and public consultations. However, happned there some acts of vandalism regardless of the accordance to local public requirements.

Analysis of program/function

• What are the main functional characteristics?
• How have they been expressed or incorporated?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

• How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
• Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

• How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
• Is the use changing? Are there any issues?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Future development directions

• How is the area/project/plan evolving?
• Are there any future goals?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

• Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
• What were their main evaluations?

Pleas add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

• What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?

Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

• Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Which research questions does it generate?

Short statement plus background notes

Image Gallery

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

• Yourimage.jpg

  your image text

References

Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

---

About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories