Marjan Park in Split - Croatia

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search

>>>Back to Case Studies Overview


>>>Marian Park Forest

Marjan Park Forest add the site name
Split add the city name
Croatia add the country
Stanislava Odrljin add your name(s), optional
World Heritage if applicable,enter the year of listing

[[File:LED_PARK FOREST MARJAN_ASSIGNMENT 1_ODRLJIN_STANISLAVA_1]

Error in widget GoogleMaps: unable to write file /var/www/wikienfk5/extensions/Widgets/compiled_templates/wrt67ecee229564b1_96757634

Why is this case relevant?

  • The hill Marjan has had an interesting history of being a natural area that was devastated and re-naturalized by the citizens of Split. Because its history is so long, it is a very interesting case study in the relationship of people to nature within a town. Marjan has been a backdrop in the city’s vista from its beginnings. Prehistoric people lived in the oak forest on Marjan, as did solitary monks. For a period of time it was protected by Venetians and later exploited for timber. For many years it was a barren hill, until aristocrats decided to reforest it to serve as hunting grounds. During the socialist period, reforestation was an organized voluntary activity for groups of young people. Today, the result of this reforesting is an aged pine forest that is everyone’s favorite place to spend the weekend. Its cultural value comes from these layers of history which tell its story. Also fascinating is the future of the forest. The fact that it was re-forested almost a hundred years ago means that the trees are now very old, soon it will be time to introduce young trees and plants. The method and choices used, along with better knowledge of botany and ecology today can completely shape this space into a rich, new city commons in which the history of people intervening in nature can be continued in a positive way.

Which idea of ‘design with nature’ guides the design concept of this site?

  • In this section you talk about the design concept of your area. Is it a highly maintained site, i.e. does the design with nature require intensive maintenance? Or does the site follow a more organic interpretation of nature? Which changes are expected if maintenance is missing?

Which challenges is this landscape facing?

  • Here you discuss the types of negative impact you are observing but you can also mention new functions that could give a development opportunity

What would be your strategy for improvement?

Finally, please share some ideas of how you would initiate positive change for your heritage area

Back to top

Image Gallery

Back to top

References

  • Author Year: Title, publisher, edition, page, ...
  • etc.
  • Website Year: Link, keyword, ...
  • etc.




Back to top