Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 23

From Wikienfk5
Revision as of 19:58, 8 January 2014 by Andreea Webb (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feedback from Group 8

Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the group activity was a productive one. The concept map is fairly detailed and overall the group presentation was good as well. However the situation is different on the individual case studies.

Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania

>good case study

>more information on the existing problems could have been added

>case is not complete

Case Study B - Eko o ni Baje Garden, Lagos

>good choice for the case study

>interesting case being already designed for the people but not used

>you did a great job presenting the space

>would be really curious what the solution for this problem is

>your case is not completed

Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina

>good choice for the case study

>the evaluation and the solution are a little too superficial

>there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description

>the proposal could have been a little more detailed

>in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work