Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 25

From Wikienfk5
Revision as of 19:08, 11 December 2013 by Nishtha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Nishtha''': I see major similarities in the second and third case. They both have a focus on water and they are both forgotten places which could be manipulated to become v...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nishtha: I see major similarities in the second and third case. They both have a focus on water and they are both forgotten places which could be manipulated to become very good landscapes. Even your projective approaches are very similar in the sense that you both try to use minimal intervention and using the existing plant system as a base for further development. As for case 1, very typical for a lot landscape sites in developing Asian countries to not have proper access and amenities but of course the natural untouched landscape is always an advantage that cannot be easily found in the rest of the world! The access base would be a great development for this site. Good work everybody!