Talk:Evaluation Seminar International Perspectives Planting Design

CASE A: Gerdab (Gerdab-e Ben, the Ben lagoon) گرداب بِن by Majid Amani Beni

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) : The author pressented an interesting case study that I hadn't any knowledge before. I enjoyed learning about this site. The case was well documented from the cultural point of view but lacks in information about climate and plant species that are relevant for me to fully understand the site characteristics. The analytic drawings demonstrate author's approch in a macro fashion. This could be a good way to undertand the site context but I think he should be more interested in detailed view on the site, too. He didn't upload any projective drawings but from analyzing the analytic drawings I can say that the author want to have a continous tree line and better realtion between the site and soroundings. In my opinion I would try to show more the unicity of the place by treating the site as an oasis in the context of lack of green areas. The lagoon have the potentiol to be highlated because of the plants that are there that seems to be in contrast with soroundings, and this asspects can be morevaluable then integrate the site more fluently with the soroundings. This way it can become a interesting site from tourism point o view and al andmark for the region. I encorouge the author to keep documenting about this place because it's an interesting one and should be given more attention from the community.

CASE B: Park Angiolina by Leon Plahuta

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) : The author did a complete and very well documentation about his chosen case study. Park Angiolina is world know for its flower borders. I enjoyed reading about whole site and learning important fact about its culture and landscape. The documentation he made made a very clear idea about the site and its context. I enjoyed that the author raised some questions and issues about law when it comes to protected areas and how green saces are degrating in time or how can we conserve the site. This questions can lead to an intersting discussion and raise awerness on this important issue. Even though the author admits his subjectivity on the case he present very relevant information on the site. The analytic drawings are very well done with clear information that puts firmly the site in the urban context and showing the good and bad parts that can imediatly lead to proposals. After this good documentation and analyzing of the site the proposals came naturally. Ilike the author's perspective on non aggresive interventions that do not change the site characteristics but improve its value through punctual functional proposals that can are developing the area of the park.

CASE C: MFO-Park by Carolina Esteves Flores

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) :