Future Landscapes Group 5

--> Back to overview of assignment 3

Core Questions

Attention: this is a dynamic page list, the answers written in your case studies will appear automatically here. Do not edit this second paragraph.

In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?

Comment to work of Kassel from Montevideo: The necessity of food production in a country with limited tillable land makes that a simple rice paddy, being just a cultivable territory, becomes part of the cultural identity of China and transforms itself in a possible target-landscape for the nation.

Comment to work of Tartu from Montevideo: The Independence Square in Tallinn is a typical example for an urban space with an important history and which needs to connect different parts of the city. As far as society needs a place which represents it, these squares will be part of our future landscape.

<DPL>

 category=Future Landscapes Group 5 Case Study
 mode=ordered
 include = #Core Question 1: In how far does this project reveal your concept of future landscapes?

</DPL>

What is the role of landscape architecture in this project?

Comment to work of Kassel from Montevideo: The Shenyang Architectural University Campus in China is a very good example for the study of a case that soon will be a problem for all the world. Thought in these terms, it is clear that for the concept of landscape the aesthetic component would not be so much important. A landscape architecture ought to redefine its role towards this situation.

Comment to work of Tartu from Montevideo: Just in September 2010 a group of architects won the architectural competition for the redesign of our Independence Square in Montevideo. Citizens of Montevideo are now looking at the plans. And many people say: Who did ask us what we wanted? And we ask you, if the problems with the Statue of Liberty in the Square of Tallinn did not happen because people were not consulted before the redesign. Maybe the role of a landscape architect in such a project should consider the public consultation like in the Punta Yeguas Park.

<DPL>

 category=Future Landscapes Group 5 Case Study
 mode=ordered
 include = #Core Question 2: What is the role of landscape architecture in this project?

</DPL>

Comparative Analysis

• Which major similarities and differences could you identify in those two case studies?

In our group, three cases focus on totelly different aspects.The difference between three cases are much more obvious and worth identifing.So we collect the differences and compare them from six aspects. Especially, when put the attributes of one case to another, it inspires much more.(concept map)

• 

  difference identitied by the cases study

Synthesis and Outlook

When we face the issue of the future landscape,how should explain.We think we should first identify the new changes or we call them new challenges ,then we indicate how the landscape react when face all this challenges.Finally ,we can illustrate how should future landscape be.In this way ,we make a conclusion after our three cases study(concept map).

The case studies we show do not represent exactly the future landscapes we desire, because they don′t represent all the aspects we are looking for, just as economical, nature, aesthetics, cultural, rural, and so on.We also cannot live in a park, in square nor in campus, like in the case studies presented by Wageningen group, or the ideal project from the coast of Tallinn. We should insist that each one of us selected each case, because we thought that they represent for us a very important issue to integrate in future landscape planning:

In Punta Yeguas Park: the active participation of citizens in the

In Shenyang Campus: the focus on survival issue

In the Square of Tallinn: the importance of cultural heritage

• 

  future landscape

Back to top