Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 23: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
>there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description | >there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description | ||
>the proposal could have been a little more | >the proposal could have been a little more detailed | ||
>in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work | >in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work | ||
Revision as of 19:49, 8 January 2014
Feedback from Group 8
Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the group activity was a productive one. The concept map is fairly detailed and overall the group presentation was good as well.
Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania
Case Study B - Eko o ni Baje Garden, Lagos
Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina
>good choice for the case study
>the evaluation and the solution are a little too superficial
>there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description
>the proposal could have been a little more detailed
>in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work