Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 23: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) |
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina''' | '''Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina''' | ||
>good choice for the case study | |||
>the evaluation and the solution are a little too superficial | |||
>there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description | |||
>the projective could have been a little more detail | |||
>in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work | |||
Revision as of 19:47, 8 January 2014
Feedback from Group 8
Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the group activity was a productive one. The concept map is fairly detailed and overall the group presentation was good as well.
Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania
Case Study B - Eko o ni Baje Garden, Lagos
Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina
>good choice for the case study >the evaluation and the solution are a little too superficial >there's an imbalance between the drawings and the description >the projective could have been a little more detail >in conclusion it is a good case but needed a little bit more work