Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 4: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:


''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''
''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''
Due to the fact the plot has been managed at a low maintenance ratio, a lot of the garden has succumb to overgrowth and weeds.


== Analytical drawings ==
== Analytical drawings ==

Revision as of 09:26, 8 January 2014

---> back to group page working group 4

Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site


Name Arboretum Hemelrijk - Area Spillebeek
Location Essen
Country Belgium
Authors Anna Martinez, Oliver Linder, Matthieu Mehuys
Survey.jpg

Landscape and/or urban context of your case

  • Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics
  • you can keep this short
  • Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

What are the objectives of your design?

Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process

Due to the fact the plot has been managed at a low maintenance ratio, a lot of the garden has succumb to overgrowth and weeds.

Analytical drawings

Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.

Projective drawings

Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.

Design Synthesis

Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the SWOTanalysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.

Summary of the collaborative process

Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).

Image Gallery

You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings


References

* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.

* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.

* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.



About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "", add your categories