Lincoln: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 281: Line 281:
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?  
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?  


::Plans for development of the dairy block are under consideration
Some examples of how the structure plan is reflected in the plan area today include:
 
::*Plans for development of the dairy block are under consideration (Map)
::*A new community centre has been approved
::*Planting in the township is more sensitive to local ecological values.
::*Landscaping and street tree planting contributes to enhance aesthetics.


* Are there any future goals?
* Are there any future goals?
 
::*Greater consistency in implementing the aims of the struture plan.
The Lincoln





Revision as of 22:00, 15 December 2008

Planning for expansion: the reinvention of a small town in New Zealand

Name Lincoln Structure Plan
Place Lincoln
Country New Zealand
Topic Structure Planning
Author(s) ?
Completion Wednesday 28 May 2008
Client Please enter the client
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Lincoln001Autostitch.jpg
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="-43.640516" lon="172.484407" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">

</googlemap>

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

This is the story of what shaped and influenced the development of a structure plan for a small town in New Zealand. Lincoln township is intimately linked to the history of Lincoln University. Its historical evolution illustrates many generic aspects of small rural towns in New Zealand, but it has special interest because of the way it is associated with the development of New Zealand. The Resource Management Act 1991 in conjunction with restructuring of the state sector and local and regional government has brought about significant changes in the approach to environmental management in New Zealand. The future of Lincoln will be shaped by the goals and principles of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy, which has identified Lincoln as a growth centre, based upon its potential for a ‘new knowledge economy’. This case study explores the elements, patterns and dynamics that are shaping the character of Lincoln as the community expands and moves from being a sleepy rural township to become a centre of growth and innovation. In particular, I consider the role of Lincoln University in this transition both as a landowner and as an educator actively engaged in local issues and the development of the Landscape Architecture profession in New Zealand.

Author's perspective

As a Landscape Architecture Masters student at Lincoln I approach this case study both from an academic perspective and as a member of the community. My professional background is in regional land use planning and resource management both in northern Canada and China. This has equipped me with a McHargian perspective which we are encouraged to explore further through our design studios in landscape architecture. Experience working with communities has also given me an appreciation of the opportunities and limitations of grass roots initiatives. I believe the case study method provides a systematic and disciplined approach to landscape architecture and exploring Lincoln from this perspective provides a clearer insight into the patterns that have shaped the township. As part of the LE:NOTRE Urban Landscapes Seminar this provides a useful resource for learning, collaboration and development of a more culturally aware landscape architecture profession.

Lecture Recording

Paul Wilson's presentation on 10th of December 2008

Landscape and/or urban context

Lincoln is on the Canterbury Plains which extend from Lake Ellesmere to the foothills of the Southern Alps. The Lower Plains comprise a broad plain of un-cemented outwash river gravels overlain with variable loess cover from glacial periods (1). To the north and south mountain-fed rivers extend down to the Pacific Ocean. The Waimakariri flood plain extends across the south/eastern edge of Lincoln and the land is lower. At one time the edge of Lake Ellesmere was close to the centre of the township. This is reflected in the soil types with drier soils found in the north and heavier wetter soils are found in the south. It is also apparent in the water system surrounding the township. There is a distinctive change from water races to water drainage and from springs to wells. The original vegetation would also have reflected the soil conditions. Management of water is important for draining and irrigating productive agricultural land. The region has a temperate climate and receives an annual rainfall of 600-800mm/annum with westerly winds predominating in all seasons (2). Waterways, wetlands and areas of significant remnant vegetation are important for biodiversity and act as corridors for migrating birds. Drainage races extend as far as Lake Ellesmere which is the largest lake in New Zealand and a significant haven for birds. Locally habitat is found around the Liffey Stream system and pockets of vegetation around Lincoln University campus and the Crown Research Institutes. These provide islands between native remnants.

The cultural landscape of the Plains is dominated by agriculture and small settlements. The distant views to the Alps and Port Hills appear between coniferous shelter belts that provide definition to the open landform. The historic layout of Lincoln township is evident in the orderly grid aligned with the main street. There are also a number of heritage buildings and the mature trees along the Liffey stream which help orientate the visitor. No areas or sites of cultural significance to Maori have been identified to date within Lincoln township (3), although Lake Ellesmere (Te Waihora) to the south has special cultural importance (4). At the centre of the township along Gerald Street there is a pub and several shops, community services, small commercial establishments and a poorly defined market square. Further along there is a modern café and a line of shops set back from the road facing into a car park. North of the centre there are primary and high schools, elderly residences, a golf course and cemetery. There is also a domain with several sports fields, a bowling club and tennis courts. The cottage garden style plantings and mature vegetation of some of the older sections introduce a distinctively rural European character although native planting now dominate particularly in new areas. There are several new suburban developments each with a distinctive branding. Here the lot sizes and street patterns are more irregular than the centre. There are frequent cul-de-sacs, pedestrian ways and many streets are narrower than the older avenues and lined with trees. Some of both the old and new sections have been fenced along the road frontage which detracts from the open street atmosphere.

On the road north-east towards Christchurch, former agricultural land is now dominated by lifestyle blocks which expanded during the 1990’s. Additional planting around these sites reduces the open character and blurs the distinction between urban and rural. In contrast the high rise buildings of Lincoln University emerge above mature trees to the east about one kilometre from the town centre. They are separated from residential areas by productive agricultural land and the Crown Research Institutes. Historic research records for soils in the area make the land invaluable for the region. The campus includes a range of contemporary buildings arranged around Ivey Hall (1878) which dates back to the original School of Agriculture. The campus has grown and adapted to accommodate a growing student population. In the summer the grounds are home of New Zealand cricket and there are sports fields, amenity gardens, a vineyard and an orchard. Both the University and the town centre are serviced by regular bus services to Hornby and Christchurch. There was once a rail connection to Christchurch and today there are plans to extend a cycle track along the original route.


Cultural/social/political context

Lincoln Township Settlement of Lincoln Village began in 1863 under the direction of the Canterbury Association which was set up to organise the settlement of the region (5). It served primarily as an agricultural settlement in an area renowned for its productivity and strong community spirit. As rural townships declined it maintained its vibrancy and retained essential services. In part this is attributed to the presence of the University and Crown Research Institutes, which provide stable employment and investment in the community. However, the varied demographic places demands on the townships accommodation and services. The Lincoln area is also popular for what Cadieux (2008) describes as “amenity migration to urban edge lifestyle landscapes”, which is reflected in the high number of professionals and retired people taking up residence (6). Many students now commute to Lincoln from more affordable parts of Christchurch. In response to changing rural character several projects have been initiated by the community including “An Environmental Plan for Lincoln (1974)” and “Lincoln - A vision for our future (2001)” (7), (8 & 9). The later was intended to provide an integrated approach towards a shared vision for Lincoln and ten visions were identified. The project coincided with growing National concern over urban development practices. Today the grassroots organisations such as Lincoln Enviro-Town take an active role in community development.

Lincoln University The School of Agriculture was established in 1878 reflecting the importance of agriculture for early European settlers. It was associated with Canterbury University (formerly Canterbury College) until 1896 and again between 1961 and 1990 during which it was known as Lincoln College. In 1990 it was separated from the University of Canterbury and became a full and self-governing university in its own right, with the title Lincoln University. Today it is one of eight publicly owned and operated government-funded universities that exists and operates under New Zealand statute, principally the New Zealand Education Act 1989. It is a research-led institution with an emphasis on land-based disciplines and their associated industries. Responsibility for the University's commercial trading activities is delegated to Lincoln University Holdings Ltd.

Ngāi Tahu The Māori people of the southern islands of New Zealand are known as Ngāi Tahu. Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu provides a detailed description of their history (10). Their descendants first arrived from Polynesia around 1500 years ago and began to transform the unoccupied landscape through hunting and fire. Around 1795 they first encountered and traded with Pākehā (European) sealers and whalers. In 1840 the Maori signed the Treaty of Wiatangi with the British Crown (11). Since then they were progressively marginalised. It was only in the late 20th century that efforts were made at reconciliation. These developments have led to a revival in Maori values and culture. In 1991 the Waitangi Tribunal found the tribe to be entitled to substantial redress through a process of negotiated settlements. The Crown's Settlement Offer included Economic Redress in the form of cash and mechanisms that “gave Ngāi Tahu the capacity, right and opportunity to re-establish its tribal base” (12). The Treaty Settlement Area of Lake Ellesmere (Te Waihora) is in close proximity to Lincoln. The Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Act 1996 established Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu to service the tribe's statutory rights. Their investment company trades under the name Ngāi Tahu Holdings Group and its subsidiaries include Ngāi Tahu Property Limited. The company’s main focus is property investment and development and the management of the Iwi's Right of First Refusal (RFR) to purchase Crown property assets under Part 9 of the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998. Since its inception in 1994 it has grown to become one of the largest property companies in the South Island of New Zealand.

Planning System As a colony New Zealand inherited a government and planning system similar to Britain. The flow of trade and migrants from the west helped maintain this heritage until the 1980’s when pressures from globalisation led New Zealand to deregulate and restructure its economy. Resource production and environmental management functions were separated and agricultural subsidies removed. A new institutional framework was delivered through the Environmental Act 1986, the Conservation Act 1987 and amendments to the Local Government Act 1974 in 1989. This laid a foundation for the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA91) and Local Government Act 2002 (LGA02), which provide the legislative context in which the Lincoln Structure Plan was developed. The RMA91 superseded a multitude of other statutes with a philosophy of 'sustainable management' and created a three tier hierarchical planning framework. Central Government retains an overview function while environmental monitoring and management responsibilities are devolved to elected Regional (Environment Canterbury) and District Councils (Selwyn District Council). Under RMA91 National and Regional Policy Statements are prepared and each District is required to prepare a District Plan. All documents must be consistent with RMA91 and each other. The new legislative framework presented a challenge to local government resources and conventional planning processes. The familiar zoning approach was replaced by effects based management with decisions based on 'perceived sustainability'. It took time to develop and approve the District Plans and it was difficult to attend to all community concerns, particularly in respect to the tensions over development on the urban fringe. This was apparent in the withdrawal of the Proposed Selwyn District Plan in 1998 due to the large number of submissions. The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA02) provided new direction with respect to consultation. A new 'community outcomes' provision was enacted and intented "to enable a strategic planning approach with an emphasis on greater collaboration/co-operation between central government and local government, between the public, private and voluntary/community sectors, and with Iwi"(13). LGA02 requires all local authorities to develop a Long Term Council Community Plan (LTCCP). A core element of an LTCCP is the description of “community outcomes”. In subsequent years a series of complementary policy documents have been developed to address LGA02 requirements including those related to RMA91. The National 'Urban Design Protocol' provides a "framework of national policy guidance around successful towns and cities and quality urban design"(14). At the Regional Level the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (UDS) has been developed. This sets out land use distribution, particularly the areas available for urban development, the household densities for various areas and other key components for consolidated and integrated urban development and that land which is to remain rural for resource protection and enhancement and other reasons (15). The UDS projected figures provided a basis for developing the Lincoln Structure Plan (LSP). The purpose of the LSP is to outline an urban design vision for the future development of Lincoln Township and to provide a strategic framework to guide the development process (3).

Landscape Architecture Profession Jones (2000) provides a detailed history of the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects and additional information is provided in Wilson (2005)(16)(17). The foundation of the profession in New Zealand is closely related to the University of Lincoln. Professional education in landscape architecture was first offered at Lincoln in 1969 and by 1972 there were sufficient graduates to form the institute. The majority of landscape architects practicing in New Zealand today have spent time at Lincoln University. Under the RMA91 landscape is grouped into three categories: outstanding landscapes (s 6b), amenity landscapes (s 7c & s 7d) and other landscapes. In this context landscape is seen as an "integrator, embracing other resources" (Henderson & de Lambert 1993)(18). This provided new impetus for growth of the profession. Being involved in Structure Planning is one of a broad range of tasks the landscape architecture profession is called upon to undertake in New Zealand today.

Crown Research Institutes In 1992 former public resource production functions were devolved to state owned corporations or privatised. Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) were established under the Crown Research Institutes Act 1992 as Government-owned businesses with a scientific purpose. Each institute is based around a productive sector of the economy or a grouping of natural resources. A number of these are based in Lincoln providing jobs and revenue to the community and links with the University. The CRI’s are positioned to provide technological and information based services and Lincoln has the potential to develop a 'new knowledge economy'. This was identified under the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.

History

DATE EVENT
500 Ngāi Tahu decedents arrive from Polynesian, settle and establish the Maori culture
~1795 Ngāi Tahu first contact with Pākehā (European) sealers and whalers
1840 Treaty of Waitangi signed by Maori and British Crown
1850 Christchurch Settled
1862 Settlement of Lincoln Village began
1878 Lincoln School of Agriculture established
1969 Lincoln University begins to offer professional education in landscape architecture
1972 New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects incorporated
1974 The Local Government Act 1974
1974 An Environmental Plan for Lincoln Village
1977 Town and Country Planning Act 1977
1986 Environmental Act 1986
1987 Conservation Act 1987
1989 Town and Country Planning Act 1977 amended and local government reformed
1989 New Zealand Education Act 1989
1990 Lincoln University becomes full and self-governing university
1991 Waitangi Tribunal findings on Ngāi Tahu land claim
1991 Resource Management Act 1991 (until notification of the new plan earlier District Schemes are collectively in force as the Selwyn Transitional District Plan)
1992 Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) established as Government-owned scientific businesses
1990’s Expansion of lifestyles and suburban development

Emergence of Lincoln tertiary /research cluster

1994 Inception of Ngāi Tahu Property Limited
1995 July Proposed Selwyn District Plan released by Selwyn District Council
1996 Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Act (1996)
1996 Town and Country Planning Act 1977 amended requiring local authorities to develop ten-year strategic and capital works plans
1998 Proposed Selwyn District Plan withdrawn
1998 “Lincoln Township Questionnaire” commissioned by Selwyn District Council
1998 “Lincoln Townscape Plan” proposed by Lincoln Community Committee
October 1999-March 2001 “Lincoln - a Vision for our Future”
1999/2000 Redrafting of the Selwyn District Plan
2000 Proposed District Plan
2004 Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy initiated
2005 March Urban Design Protocol launched
2007 June Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy adopted by councils
2007 June Lincoln Structure Plan and ISMP Issues and Options Report
2007 July Proposed Change No.1 to the Regional Policy Statement - notified
June 2008 Selwyn Proposed District Plan operative (with exception of parts affected by submissions, appeals or unresolved designation issues)
2008 May Lincoln Structure Plan and Integrated Stormwater Management Plan adopted
Ongoing Student Projects provide innovation

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

  • What are the main structural features?
Lincoln is situated between Christchurch City and the Scenic Reserves of the South Alps.
The University, Crown Research Institutes and other institutions are major landowners.
The University campus is somewhat detached from the main township.
High water table/flood area in east may not be suitable for development
Drainage catchment in the south has limited capacity for storm water runoff limiting development.
High voltage transmission lines
Water treatment plant with buffer and capacity considerations.
The Liffey stream intersects the township
Existing Land Use Zoning
Isolated areas of Contaminated Land
  • How has it been shaped?
Under RMA91 agricultural land between development and conservation has become highly contested.
The growth of Lincoln University and the CRI’s is attracting investment and jobs to Lincoln.
The Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy identified Lincoln as a regional growth centre based on its potential for a ‘new knowledge economy’ providing a regional framework for Structure Plan development.
The University and CRI’s recognized the financial opportunities of residential and commercial land development. They also value the independence provided by their rural setting. Some land is invaluable because of historic research trial records.
Ngāi Tahu Property Limited has the Right of First Refusal on the sale of Crown Land (including Lincoln University and CRI’s lands) under the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998.
The community was actively interested in their future
Participatory approaches developed upon the communities initiative with the expertise of Lincoln University and support of Selwyn District Council provided a foundation for structure planning process and mobilized the community.


  • Were there any critical decisions?
  • Partner Councils of the GCUDS decided a integrated approach was required to manage growth in the region.
  • The GCUDS was initiated, population growth projections were made and four options for future development patterns were presented to the public. Public preference was for a more concentrated pattern of development including a focus on well-defined urban centres. Ultimately the GCUDS partners decided to include some greenfield development to provide room for the market to adapt to the new level of intensification.
  • GCUDS Inquiry-by-design workshops identified Lincoln as a 'growth node' based on the University, CRI's and the potential for employment and a 'new economy' to develop.
  • Some tensions arose over the role of major landowner (including the University and CRI's) in the planning process.
  • Selwyn District Council decided to initiate the Lincoln Structure Planning process and engage the community including the major landowners.
  • Lincoln University and Ngāi Tahu Property Limited decided to undertake a joint venture to develop the old dairy farm site for residential development.
  • Community initiatives led by Lincoln Enviro-town decided to engage University and CRI's expertise. Landscape Architecture students were encouraged to explore innovative options for Lincolns future.
  • Selwyn District Council decided to develop the Integrated Stormwater Management Plan in parallel with the Structure Plan. Participants agreed on the importance of blue and green networks in managing stormwater, biodiversity and aesthetics in new residential areas.
  • Selwyn District Council chose to revise the GCUDS growth projections during the Structure Planning Process and lodged a submission to this effect in Change 1 proposed to the Regional Policy Statement.

Core Questions Working Group Green Structure Planning

How does funding influence the planning and use of public space?

There is a strong legislative basis for public involvement in decision making in New Zealand. This is reflected both in funding, planning, use and management of public space. The council’s role is one of service provision and public space is regarded as a community asset. Dedicating resources to Structure Planning helps build consensus and a shared sense of ownership. This is turn helps the council achieve the community outcomes it is committed to under the Local Government Act 2002. Additional funding is also provided in support of specific community initiatives such as “Environment Canterbury Environmental Enhancement Fund”. Such initiatives help reduce the burden on councils to develop and maintain open space. It also mobilizes people to value and utilise the space around them.

How are spaces within the site used, both currently and projected?

At the broad scale agricultural land currently separates residential areas of Lincoln from the University campus. Proposals for residential development and a business park on the old dairy farm site will draw these spaces together. Additional activity centres will develop and movement will no longer be restricted to the main road. A bye-pass may be required and new access points to the south of the township. Improved definition of the town centre and market square is also necessary to provide a gathering place for the community. The historic buildings could contribute to this area. Integrating green space with cycle and pedestrian movement networks also features strongly in the vision for Lincoln. Open space will also be necessary to make higher density living appealing and achieve an average density of 10.7 HH/ha. Areas for residential development will be released in stages relative to expansion to encourage an appropriate mix and density of development.

How can the historic elements / layers be integrated?

Historic elements of Lincoln fall into two main categories. (A) Pre-European elements include native vegetation which contributes to a sense of place and local ecology, this can be integrated in design through local plant signatures; Maori cultural values can provide a foundation for decision making, their role as stewards of the land is also effectively formalised in legislation. (B) Colonial historic elements are reflected in the highly modified agricultural landscape, the formal grid of the original settlement and historic buildings in the township and University Campus. Containing development within Lincoln’s urban limits will help maintain the agricultural landscape for which the Canterbury Plains is known. Historic buildings have also been preserved and could be used to better define the centre of the township. The original railway network can be re-developed into a cycle path.

How do the contributing elements of water relate to the project?

Recreation: The Liffey Stream introduces variation in the topography and layout of the township. It is also a popular place for passive recreation although there appear some tension between private gardens backing on to the water and public access. Irrigation also maintains the aesthetics of recreational turf areas. Blue and green networks feature as a means of managing storm water and maintaining aesthetics. The old dairy farm site has a relatively low drainage capacity and wetlands will be required to address storm water runoff.
Historic: the Canterbury Plains were formed by glacial river’s which is reflected in the soil conditions, native vegetation and the drainage characteristics of the area. These in turn influenced the choice of site, its expansion and the urban form that developed.
Transportation: There are several bridges linking from one side of the township to the other. These are important given that the Liffey intersects the community.
Environment: Water is a key component of Lincoln and this is reflected in the Integrated Stormwater Management Plan (ISMP), which was developed in parallel with the Structure Plan. Water provides a haven for biodiversity and helps filter pollutants from the water before it reaches the Liffey Stream. Lake Ellesmere and other local water bodies are influenced by agricultural run off and water extraction.

How does the built environment relate to the landscape around it?

The Canterbury Plains is dominated by agriculture and townships such as Lincoln. The underlying landform offers little topographic relief. Expansion of lifestyle blocks in the 1990’s introduced both additional built form into the open landscape and additional vegetation. The Structure Plan establishes boundaries to help manage growth and the traditional relationship between the built environment and the surrounding landscape. As residential density increases green space becomes more important to maintain the quality of the environment. It may be possible to leverage higher density living off green space and views to the distant mountains. The Universities has several multi-storey buildings which are an anomaly in the Plain landscape. Today they are screened somewhat by large trees. The original concept behind the “Hilgendorf Wing” design was that the landscape would flow underneath. Unfortunately the ground floor was bricked up soon after being completed to provide additional office space! Recreational areas and green space may help soften the transition between the built environment and the surrounding landscape. If people value these areas it will help contain development.

What functions should open space perform to help achieve the established goals?

Open space in Lincoln township performs several functions from managing stormwater (blue network), providing habitat (green network), an aesthetically pleasing place for recreation (social network) and linking key features (movement network). It also provides a transition between different land uses. These in turn help contribute to the community outcomes (goals for which the council is accountable).

How cultural factors (environmental perceptions, social conditions, ecological literacy, etc…) can affect the design process and its post implementation performance?

Analysis of program/function

  • What are the main functional characteristics?

The purpose of the Lincoln Structure Plan (LSP) is to outline an urban design vision for the future development of Lincoln Township and to provide a strategic framework to guide the development process. The LSP has been prepared in order to facilitate an integrated approach to achieving the sustainable management of the natural and physical resources of the Lincoln Study Area. This includes:

Development of an urban design strategy for the area;
Identification of key natural resources and community assets within and related to the area;
Establishing an integrated land use pattern that responds to the characteristics of the area;
Identification of infrastructure requirements to facilitate urban development.

(Lincoln Struture Plan 2008 (3)

  • How have they been expressed or incorporated?


Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

  • How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?

Lincoln Process Diagram.jpg

The project area was identified based on the potential for providing growth options around the existing Lincoln area and taking into account the lower plains flood area.
An urban design framework was developed outlining key assumptions, priorities, and goals of development for lincoln. This considered an integrated approach, guided by Urban Design Principles, Community Outcomes and primary development issues.
  • Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

  • How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?

The LSP creates a framework to guide development and will be used as a basis for:

Future changes to the District Plan;
Developing an infrastructure programme;
Determining the Long Term Council Community Plan.

On Wednesday 28 May 2008, the Council adopted the Lincoln Structure Plan and Integrated Stormwater Management Plan and agreed to accommodate this in the District Plan by:

amending Section 4 Growth of Townships (affecting the whole of the district);
amending the policy framework specific to Lincoln; and
adding provisions for outline development plans, new zones and staging of development.

These plan changes will be developed and notified by the end of 2008 (Details of plan changes). Once approved they will contribute to decision making on development projects in the Lincoln area.

  • Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
  • A new retail area has developed a short distance from the town centre. Parking is arranged on the road frontage which detracts from the vibrancy of the main street.
  • In 2008 new subdivisions continue to be developed at relatively low densities. It is yet to be determined how the market will respond to higher density housing and whether it can be encouraged within the existing legislative framework.
  • A supermarket has been proposed in an area zoned for a business park. There is an underlying tension between existing business owners who fear it may draw trade away from the town centre and urban designers who see an opportunity for growth and links with the University campus and CRI's. Another consideration is that a large supermarket would detract from the character of the existing town centre.
  • A supermarket location can have a major influence on the future development of the township. Similarly questions remain as to where to locate community services and ciculation routes.
  • As the population grows those people who contributed to the LSP will become the minority. Both the Community Outcomes and the Structure Plan may need to be revisited to accomodate new interests. Similarly new residents and businesses will need to be informed about the Structure Plan.
  • Questions remain as to how best to develop linkages between the Township and University. For example is it possible to reorientate the campus by developing a southern byepass and bus route along the east side of the campus or will increased traffic create a strong barrier.
  • GCUDS projections provided a basis for the draft LSP Issues and Options Report June 2007. Subesequently, SDC lodged a submission on Change 1 with respect to the UDS projections and the final Structure Plan is based on this submission. Proposed Change No.1 to the Regional Policy Statement(RPS)was notified on 28 July 2007. Its purpose is to implement the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (UDS). It may be necessary to revisit the Structure Plan following the release of decisions on Change 1 and resolution of any subsequent appeals to the Environment Court.

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Future development directions

  • How is the area/project/plan evolving?

Some examples of how the structure plan is reflected in the plan area today include:

  • Plans for development of the dairy block are under consideration (Map)
  • A new community centre has been approved
  • Planting in the township is more sensitive to local ecological values.
  • Landscaping and street tree planting contributes to enhance aesthetics.
  • Are there any future goals?
  • Greater consistency in implementing the aims of the struture plan.

The Lincoln


Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

  • Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?

The Structure Plan was subject to review by the Council prior to adoption on Wednesday 28 May 2008. Subsequent plan revisions will involve a review of the structure plan. The council is also required to revisit its community outcomes every 6 years as assess progress towards achieving them.

It may be subject professional review in future as part of environmental court hearings on resource consent applications or plan revisions. Academic review of the structure plan comes through design studios and research by the University.


  • What were their main evaluations?

Please add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

  • What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
  • successes
mobilised community
adopted a holistic approach
  • Limitations
limitations to what can be enforced e.g. density
delays in approval
subdivision standards may need to be assessed independently to ensure rural character maintained.


Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

  • Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Growth of a township is difficult to contain without clear zoning boundaries
Landscape architecture offers a holistic, synergistic approach that deals with the complexity of urban development to deliver the required level of intensification.
Changes in both economic and environmental policy affected the pattern of urban development

Which research questions does it generate?

1) What character and identity should be promoted as rural townships become part of the urban network?
2) How do you make high density living attractive in a semi rural setting?
3) How do you balance Ngāi Tahu cultural values with aspirations for economic development?
4) How do you design the interface between a University and Township?

Image Gallery

References

(1) Canterbury Regional Council. (1993). Canterbury Regional Landscape Study (Volume 1 and 2). Prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited and Lucas Associates. Christchurch, New Zealand.

(2) Bennett, E., Clayton, A., Roper-Lindsay, J., Wilson, A., Fussell, A. & Johnson, C. (1993). Natural Resources of the Canterbury Region: A Survey and Evaluation for Management.Christchurch, New Zealand: Ministry of Works and Development, Environmental Design Section.

(3) Selwyn District Council (2008). Lincoln Structure Plan. Christchurch, New Zealand: Selwyn District Council. Retrieved from: http://www.selwyn.govt.nz/planning/Lincoln/final.pdf

(4) Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. (2005). Te Waihora Joint Management Plan. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Conservation. Retrieved from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/te-waihora-joint-management-plan/

(5) Lincoln University Profile (2008, November 25th) Retrieved from the University of New Zealand Web site: http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/section69.html?

(6) Cadieux, K. V. (2008). Political ecology of exurban ‘‘lifestyle’’ landscapes at Christchurch’s contested urban fence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 7 (2008) 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.003

(7) Jackman, A. E., Mason, S. M., and Densem, G. H. (1974). An Environmental Plan for Lincoln Village – prepared for the Environment Committee of Lincoln, Landscape Consulting Services, Landscape Architecture Section, Horticulture Department, Lincoln College.

(8) Bowring, J., Montgomery, R., Rixecker, S., Kissling, C. and Steven. A. (2001). Lincoln: a vision for our future : a community-participation based envisioning project for the future Lincoln village. Volume II. Background Data. A joint Selwyn District Council and University of Lincoln Project.

(9) Bowring, J., Montgomery, R., Rixecker, S., Kissling, C. and Steven. A. 2001. Lincoln: a vision for our future : a community-participation based envisioning project for the future Lincoln village. Volume I. Report. A joint Selwyn District Council and University of Lincoln Project.

(10) Who We Are. (2008, November 25). Retrieved from Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Web site: http://www.ngaitahu.iwi.nz/About%20Ngai%20Tahu/Who%20We%20Are

(11) Ministry of Culture and Heritage. (2007, November 21). Read the Treaty. Retrieved from http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/politics/treaty/read-the-treaty/english-text

(12) Economic Security. (2008, November 25). Retrieved from Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Web site: http://www.ngaitahu.iwi.nz/About%20Ngai%20Tahu/Who%20We%20Are

(13) Local Government New Zealand. 2004. Realising the Potential of the Community Outcome Process. Prepared by McKinlay Douglas Limited. Retrieved from: http://www.lgnz.co.nz/library/publications/Realising_the_Potential.pdf

(14) Ministry of the Environment. (2005). New Zealand Urban Design Protocol. Retrieved from: http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/urban/design-protocol-mar05/urban-design-protocol-colour.pdf

(15) Urban Development Strategy. (2007). Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy and Action Plan 2007. Retrieved from: www.greaterchristchurch.org.nz/StrategyDocument/UDSActionPlan2007.pdf

(16) Jones, M (2000). History of the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects. Retrieved from: http://www.nzila.co.nz/conf_coming.asp

(17) Dr Wilson, J. (2005). Christchurch City Contextual History Overview Full. Retrieved from: http://www.ccc.govt.nz/Christchurch/Heritage/Publications/ChristchurchCityContextualHistoryOverview/ChristchurchCityContextualHistoryOverviewFull.pdf

(18) Henderson, E. & de Lambert, R. (1993). Landscape Values and Resource Management. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for the Environment.




About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories