Petuelpark: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 120: Line 120:
  -citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
  -citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
  -children
  -children
  -people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark
  -people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung
  Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark


and professionals:
and professionals:

Revision as of 22:39, 14 December 2008

An artistic and cultural project in Munich, Germany

Name Petuelpark
Place Munich
Country Germany
Topic please enter the topic here
Author(s) Martina Tuda
Completion Please enter the date of completion
Client Please enter the client
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Projectimage.jpg
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.175244" lon="11.580791" type="satellite" zoom="13" width="300" height="250">

</googlemap>

Short description

The Petuelpark is a newly-made park with gardening and artistic elements situated above the Petueltunnel. Both, the park and the tunnel, connect the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing.


official homepage of Munich: [1]

homepage Jühling und Bertram Landschaftsarchitekten: [2]

additional links: [3]

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

First of all, the Petuelpark is directly in Munich. So the population density is high in comparison to free space. Because of that fact, it's indispensible to make "new" space - for example above tunnels - accesible for public purposes. Beyond, in large cities there is often a leak of green space where people can recreate. So it's interesting to see how to handle such problems?

In this case, the concept is made for all generations. Therefore, there are different thematic areas in order to fullfill as much as possible the requirements of a wide ranged person group.

An art concept was developed contemporaneously with the urban landscape design. Now, 13 artworks are intalled all-around the park area.

Author's perspective

  • What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?

interdisciplinary planning -> more possibilities, open up new vistas, connection of social, economic and design aspects

planning "on different spacial levels" -> creation of "new" open space

planning "in breaches" -> handling of a grown-up city

Landscape and/or urban context

The Petuelpark above the Petueltunnel (longest tunnel in Munich) is located in the North of Munich between the district Schwabing and Milbertshofen. The Petuelring is a part of the "Mittlerer Ring" which is an important main road with about 120.000 vehicles per day.

The park extend from the crossroad Knorrstrasse/Belgradstrasse to the Leopoldstrasse. It's about 650 m length and at least 60 m width. Close-by, there are underground and tramway stops. Besides, the Olympiapark, the BMW-Museum and -Skyscraper and the "Münchner Freiheit" are some places of interest in the near of the Petuelpark. In the North of Munich, the park supplement the "green net" composed of Olympiapark, Luitpoldpark and Englischer Garten.

These city part is dense populated and there is a mixture between generations and nationalities.

Historical, at 1963 there was still a tunnel named Petueltunnel, which was an underground crossing of the tramway. This tunnel was put out of service at 1992 and was deconstructed because of the new one. The name Petuel is related to the family Petuel that renders credit to Munich.

Cultural/social/political context

  • Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes

History

  • How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

completion (Petueltunnel): July 2002

summer 2002: preparatory work (retaining walls, rough subgrade work, substrates)

autumn 2002: subnatural lining Nymphenburg-Biedersteiner-Kanal, start gardening and landscape work (north-side)

2003: gardening and landscape work, trees, plants, bridges, playgrounds, path, planting and lawn areas, furniture

opening: 27.06.2004

2005: Buildings ready (café with restaurant garden, Fontänenplatz, Sozialpavillon with Generationengarten)

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

  • What are the main structural features?
  • How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Core questions working group open spaces

How does the design of an open space contribute to a run down neighbourhood?

test, test, test

How are open spaces linked to the adjacent areas?

(e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, river)

How are open spaces used?

(e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does an open space fulfil)

Which elements make an open space successful and attractive?

How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public?

Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity

Who was involved in the participation process?

There were non-professionals as well as professionals involved in the planning process.

Non-professionals:

-citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
-children
-people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung  
 Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark

and professionals:

Baureferat und Planungsreferat München, which are responsible for all manners concerning the planning and construction 
 process
Ingenieurbüro Dr. Blasy + Mader, which is an engineering company
Landschaftsarchitekurbüro Jühling + Bertram, which is a company for landscape architecture
13 international artists under the leadership of Stefan Huber

took part in the participation process.

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?

Analysis of program/function

  • What are the main functional characteristics?
  • How have they been expressed or incorporated?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

  • How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
  • Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

  • How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
  • Is the use changing? Are there any issues?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Future development directions

  • How is the area/project/plan evolving?
  • Are there any future goals?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

  • Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
  • What were their main evaluations?

Pleas add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

  • What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?

Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

  • Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Which research questions does it generate?

Short statement plus background notes

Image Gallery

References

Please add literature, documentations and weblinks


About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories