Working Group History and Conservation: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
* How is the historical background of the heritage site presented to the public?   
* How is the historical background of the heritage site presented to the public?   


Notes:
'''Notes:'''


* The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate these questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th.  
* The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate these questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th.  

Revision as of 16:52, 10 December 2008

Case Studies of this working group

The list includes all case studies categorised in this group and the respective answers to the first question "Rationale:Why is this case study interesting?"

Attention: this is a dynamic page list, do not edit this paragraph!

<DPL>

 category=Working Group History and Conservation
 mode=ordered
 include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

</DPL>

Core Questions of this Working Group

  • How are the heritage sites linked to the adjacent urban landscape (e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, transportation facilities)?
  • How are the heritage sites used (e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does the listed object fullfill nowadays)? [Denise]
  • Which elements make the heritage site successful and attractive? [Yujun]
  • How is the historical background of the heritage site presented to the public?

Notes:

  • The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate these questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th.
  • People who did not attend the session on 3rd of December may have additional proposals for core questions or join a responsible person to one of the core questions above. Feel free to add questions as proposals to the list above and discuss it via e-mail or using the discussion page.
  • Please integrate the questions soon and try to deliver some draft answers before December 15th - otherwise it will become difficult to create a synthesis report for December 17th.

Minutes this Working Group

First Group Meeting 3rd of December 08

  • Screenshots: Collecting core themes and clustering
  • Moderation: Heike
  • Notes: Denise
Core aspects (unclustered)
Joint questions (blue)