Wikienfk5:Community Portal: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: --> Back to Seminar Overview ''Status: Draft 2.0 / Simon Swaffield, comments: Ellen Fetzer/Richard Stiles Sept 08'' == '''General''' == * The pur...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
--> Back to [[Case_Study_5:_356_Urban_Landscapes|Seminar Overview]]


''Status: Draft 2.0 / Simon Swaffield, comments: Ellen Fetzer/Richard Stiles Sept 08''
== '''General''' ==
* The purpose of the Le Notre Mundus case studies is for comparative teaching at advanced undergraduate or postgraduate level.
* The case studies can be focused upon an area, or a plan, or a project. The key requirement is that it should be a coherent urban or cultural landscape topic that reveals insights of potential value to educators in other countries.
* The following guidelines and checklist has been developed to guide contributors and ensure that there is some consistency of style and content. The checklist is aimed at current best practice [http://lda.ucdavis.edu/people/websites/francis/Francis%20LJ%20Methods.pdf Francis 2001].
== '''Content Checklist''' ==
=== Cover Sheet ===
* Name of case study, author[s], affiliation, contact details, date submitted
=== Rationale: Why is the case study interesting? ===
*Please summarise:- eg Design Innovation? Planning Exemplar? Theoretical Insights? Lessons from its failure? [ It doesn’t have to have been successful]
* Think about it from the view of another educator in a different country. Why should I use this case study in my teaching?
Illustrations:
Paragraph and representative image
=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?
=== Description ===
* Name; location; any relevant dates; cost if relevant; area; participants
Illustration: table format
=== Landscape context ===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics
Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses
=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes
=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?
Illustration: Table or time line
=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...
=== Successes and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main successes and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table
=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes
=== What research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes
== '''Format''' ==
=== Basic format ===
* The basic format addresses contributors who are not yet familiar with publishing directly on the LE:NOTRE homepage or on the internet in general. In this case you would submit an illustrated report in the form of a Word or a PDF file. The illustrations can either be incorporated into the text, or attached as appendices. Images, diagrams etc should be prepared as pdfs.
*A check list of sections headings is suggested below, to cover the main features of a comparative case study.
*All material should be in English
=== Powerpoint format ===
*You can enhance the basic format by adding a Powerpoint presentation. The slides should correspond to the section headings and include the core statements of your report.
*On the Powerpoint, you should aim for no more than 30 slides in total.
*Limit the text on each slide to what can easily be read by a student in a lecture, and place more detailed background notes for the teacher in the notes section.
* All material should be in English
=== LE:NOTRE Encyclopedia ===
*The new [http://www.le-notre.org/encyclopedia/encyclopedia_overview.php Encyclopaedia database] is a powerful additional resource on the LE:NOTRE web site. It will let you write structured entries and add links to web sites, images and literature references from the web site’s own databases.
*This is the recommended format for urban landscape case studies
* A tutorial for editing the encyclopedia will be published soon.
=== VITERO Seminars and Recordings ===
* VITERO stands for Virtual Team Room, this is the online meeting room of the LE:NOTRE project enabling synchronous communication on the internet.
* If your present your case study in the course of an urban landscapes online seminar, the session can be recorded and published on the LE:NOTRE website.
* Seminar recordings are important teaching resources and they will enhance your case study presentation.
* You may have a look at a recording example: [http://le-notre.org/elearning/resources/lincoln_theory Landscape Theory]
== '''Copyright''' ==
*It is vital that material in the case study is not limited by copyright and that it is legal for all members of LE NOTRE to reuse the material in their teaching.
* We recommend using a [http://creativecommons.org creative commons licence] for your contribution.

Revision as of 09:07, 28 October 2008