Restorating the history - Transformation of the city of Jelgava, Latvia: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
=== Rationale: Why is the case study interesting? === | === Rationale: Why is the case study interesting? === | ||
*''Please summarise:- e.g. Design Innovation? Planning Exemplar? Theoretical Insights? Lessons from its failure? | *''Please summarise:- e.g. Design Innovation? Planning Exemplar? Theoretical Insights? Lessons from its failure? | ||
Jelgava is the 4th largest city in Latvia and is situated 41 km southwest of the capital of Latvia with 65,419 inhabitants (data of 2009). During its history, Jelgava has suffered from multiple wars and conquerors, as a result it had shaped its cityscape dramatically. Jelgava suffered considerably after the outbreak of World War I . During World War II, the city's historical center, industry, rail network, and public buildings were heavily damaged by the fighting, with almost 90% of the city destroyed. Besides, city was destroyed not only physically, but also mentally. City lost its initial cultural landscape, houses, parks, even the old city of Jelgava. During Soviet period, city developed as an industrial center in Latvia. Plenty of industrial buildings were build, and this urban planning action moved city away form its historical roots more and more. Now Jelgava have a specific modern cultural landscape – its’ like a mosaics – next to the historical heritage and architectural monuments are situated shopping malls and block- houses, that have been built during the Soviet period. Historical plans are the only witness, who can tell us about city’s previous shape and individuality. Now it is time to reconstruct the history, what have been lost, and to integrate it in existing city planning. City desires its primary identity, what was lost for a long time period. This Case study will tell the | Jelgava is the 4th largest city in Latvia and is situated 41 km southwest of the capital of Latvia with 65,419 inhabitants (data of 2009). During its history, Jelgava has suffered from multiple wars and conquerors, as a result it had shaped its cityscape dramatically. Jelgava suffered considerably after the outbreak of World War I . During World War II, the city's historical center, industry, rail network, and public buildings were heavily damaged by the fighting, with almost 90% of the city destroyed. Besides, city was destroyed not only physically, but also mentally. City lost its initial cultural landscape, houses, parks, even the old city of Jelgava. During Soviet period, city developed as an industrial center in Latvia. Plenty of industrial buildings were build, and this urban planning action moved city away form its historical roots more and more. Now Jelgava have a specific modern cultural landscape – its’ like a mosaics – next to the historical heritage and architectural monuments are situated shopping malls and block- houses, that have been built during the Soviet period. Historical plans are the only witness, who can tell us about city’s previous shape and individuality. Now it is time to reconstruct the history, what have been lost, and to integrate it in existing city planning. City desires its primary identity, what was lost for a long time period. This Case study will tell the Reader about Jelgava example – how Jelgava is recovering its own historical and cultural landscape.'' | ||
=== Author's perspective === | === Author's perspective === |
Revision as of 19:54, 7 June 2010
Name | Jelgava transformation project | |
Place | Jelgava | |
Country | Latvia | |
Author(s) | Ieva Kiesnere | |
Project start | enter the date of the project start | |
Completion | enter the date of completion | |
World Heritage | enter the year of listing | |
Client | Jelgava Municipality | |
Project costs | enter the costs (if known) | |
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="56.646412" lon="23.715706" zoom="13" width="400" height="300" controls="small"></googlemap> | ||
Rationale: Why is the case study interesting?
- Please summarise:- e.g. Design Innovation? Planning Exemplar? Theoretical Insights? Lessons from its failure?
Jelgava is the 4th largest city in Latvia and is situated 41 km southwest of the capital of Latvia with 65,419 inhabitants (data of 2009). During its history, Jelgava has suffered from multiple wars and conquerors, as a result it had shaped its cityscape dramatically. Jelgava suffered considerably after the outbreak of World War I . During World War II, the city's historical center, industry, rail network, and public buildings were heavily damaged by the fighting, with almost 90% of the city destroyed. Besides, city was destroyed not only physically, but also mentally. City lost its initial cultural landscape, houses, parks, even the old city of Jelgava. During Soviet period, city developed as an industrial center in Latvia. Plenty of industrial buildings were build, and this urban planning action moved city away form its historical roots more and more. Now Jelgava have a specific modern cultural landscape – its’ like a mosaics – next to the historical heritage and architectural monuments are situated shopping malls and block- houses, that have been built during the Soviet period. Historical plans are the only witness, who can tell us about city’s previous shape and individuality. Now it is time to reconstruct the history, what have been lost, and to integrate it in existing city planning. City desires its primary identity, what was lost for a long time period. This Case study will tell the Reader about Jelgava example – how Jelgava is recovering its own historical and cultural landscape.
Author's perspective
- What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please make a short note on your personal background
Cultural landscape context
- Biogeography, cultural features, overall landscape character, history and dynamics
Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses
Socio-political context
- Brief explanation of political economy, legal framework
Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes
Spatial analysis of area/project
- What are the main structural features?
- How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Analysis of idea/program/function ("Planning Objective")
- What are the main functional characteristics?
- How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Analysis of design/planning process ("Process Biography")
- How was the area/project formulated and implemented?
- Who initiated the project and why?
- Which stakeholders have been involved?
- Who made the major decisions and when?
- Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Analysis of use/users
- How is the area/project used and by whom?
- Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Future development directions
- How is the area/project evolving?
- Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes
Peer reviews or critique
- Has the area/project been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
- What were their main evaluations?
Please add references, quotes...
Successes and limitations
- What do you see as the main successes and limitations of the area/project?
Illustration: Summary table
What can be generalized from this case study?
- Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes
What research questions does it generate?
Short statement plus background notes
Image Gallery
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
- Yourimage.jpg
your image text and source
References
- Author Year: Title, publisher, edition, page, ...
- etc.
- Website Year: Link, keyword, ...
- etc.