Naturpark Südgelände: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 117: Line 117:
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Parks]]
[[Category:Parks]]
[[Category:Switzerland]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Zürich]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Working Group Open Spaces]]
[[Category:Working Group Open Spaces]]


About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Revision as of 22:12, 18 November 2008

conversion of traffic area in Berlin, Germany

Name please enter the name here
Place please enter the town/area name
Country please enter the country here
Topic please enter the topic here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)
Completion Please enter the date of completion
Client Please enter the client
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Projectimage.jpg
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="52.46273" lon="13.355856" zoom="15" width="300" height="250">

52.459331, 13.357846, naturpark südgelände </googlemap>

Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

This project has found a way to combine various demands as recreation, environemental aspects, a low budget with an attractive and simple design.

Due to its original function as a railway station, its interesting to see, how they deal with historic tracks and use them to create a new identity.

Author's perspective

  • What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?


Landscape and/or urban context

  • Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Cultural/social/political context

  • Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration: Bullet points, image, background notes

History

  • How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

Spatial analysis of area/project/plan

  • What are the main structural features?
  • How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of program/function

  • What are the main functional characteristics?
  • How have they been expressed or incorporated?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of design/planning process

  • How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
  • Were there any important consultations/collaborations?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Analysis of use/users

  • How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
  • Is the use changing? Are there any issues?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Future development directions

  • How is the area/project/plan evolving?
  • Are there any future goals?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

Peer reviews or critique

  • Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
  • What were their main evaluations?

Pleas add references, quotes...

Points of success and limitations

  • What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?

Illustration: Summary table

What can be generalized from this case study?

  • Are there any important theoretical insights?

Short statement plus background notes

Which research questions does it generate?

Short statement plus background notes

Image Gallery

References

Please add literature, documentations and weblinks


About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories