Working Group Recreation, Tourism and Landscape Development: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
-> Back to [[Working Groups Rural Landscapes]]
== Case Studies of this working group ==
== Case Studies of this working group ==
  Attention: These are 2 dynamic page lists, do not edit this paragraph as it is created automatically.  
  Attention: These are 2 dynamic page lists, do not edit this paragraph as it is created automatically.  

Revision as of 08:37, 31 May 2009

-> Back to Working Groups Rural Landscapes

Case Studies of this working group

Attention: These are 2 dynamic page lists, do not edit this paragraph as it is created automatically. 
Text added to the first two chapters of your case study pages will automatically appear here.

Rationales:Why are these case studies interesting?

<DPL>

 category=WG Recreation, Tourism and Landscape Development
 mode=ordered
 include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?

</DPL>

The Landscape Context

<DPL>

 category=WG Recreation, Tourism and Landscape Development
 mode=ordered
 include = #Landscape and/or urban context

</DPL> Back to top

Cross-Cutting Questions of this Working Group

Please list the cross-cutting questions identified during group discussion.

Synthesis of core questions

The synthesis will evolve at the end of the seminar

Minutes of this Working Group

27 May 2009

Every group presented its case study and what they intend to do.

1. Golija - Studenica, Serbia. Development of eco tourism in Biosphere Reserve; sustainable eco tourism; link nature, culture and community.

2. Kemeri National Park, Latvia. Landscape development; management in tourism; participation of people; wetlands, dunes, meadows are landscape elements; unique landscape and diversity.

3.Salvati Rosia Montana, Romania. Mining area; geology and architecture are treasures; mining area will destroy all the heritage, settlements, cultural monuments; rural landscape should be protected; search for other ways of development of the area that wouldn` t deteriote the environment.

4.The land of Buzau, Romania. Geopark; protected area; the idea is to work on strategies of harmonious development of the area(infrastructure, tourism, nature protection).

5. Hebron, Palestine. Ecotourism and cultural landscape conservation.

Then participants put cards with the core themes they would like to cope with in their case studies. The core themes are clustered in groups: CONSERVATION (of cultural landscape), MANAGEMENT (related to tourism, infrastructure, etc.), PARTICIPATION (of local communities). Back to top