Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 5

CASE A: Gerdab (Gerdab-e Ben, the Ben lagoon) گرداب بِن by Majid Amani Beni

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) : The author pressented an interesting case study that I hadn't any knowledge before. I enjoyed learning about this site. The case was well documented from the cultural point of view but lacks in information about climate and plant species that are relevant for me to fully understand the site characteristics. The analytic drawings demonstrate author's approch in a macro fashion. This could be a good way to undertand the site context but I think he should be more interested in detailed view on the site, too. He didn't upload any projective drawings but from analyzing the analytic drawings I can say that the author want to have a continous tree line and better realtion between the site and soroundings. In my opinion I would try to show more the unicity of the place by treating the site as an oasis in the context of lack of green areas. The lagoon have the potentiol to be highlated because of the plants that are there that seems to be in contrast with soroundings, and this asspects can be more valuable then integrate the site more fluently with the soroundings. This way it can become a interesting site from tourism point o view and a landmark for the region. I encorouge the author to keep documenting about this place because it's an interesting one and should be given more attention from the community.

Rebecca: Analytical drawing 4 is the most helpful diagram, which visually explains the problems of the site. It brought up a few questions in my head such as: is there a mix of species of the trees? It seems that the lagoon is mostly for human recreation, perhaps you could suggest also lower level planting, which might also provide new more enclosed spaces for people to relax in? As Radu mentioned, seeing the site as an 'oasis,' is something you could really run with. You were saying one negative point was that there is no green space between the city and the lagoon. It is a really great idea to connect the city to the lagoon via a green route. I believe this would be a good way to encourage people to go to the lagoon, and also, to walk or ride a bike there. However! How easy would it be to do this in the climate? What is the climate?! I saw in one of your pictures near by some irrigated planting site, presumably agricultural food produce. If a planting design would need irrigation, this is another problem you should bring up. It would be interesting to know what animals insects you might find there? I noticed that the edge of the lagoon is a concrete edge, which is not ecologically great; it is better to have sloping slightly vegetated banks. If there is any trailing native plant species, this is a easy/cheap way to connect the water to the land for nature. As Radu says there is no information about the climate, or the plants that can deal with it, so that would be a good next step to add.

CASE B: Park Angiolina by Leon Plahuta

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) : The author did a complete and very good documentation about his chosen case study. Park Angiolina is world known for its flower borders. I enjoyed reading about whole site and learning important facts about its culture and landscape. The documentation he's done, made a very clear idea about the site and its context. I enjoyed that the author raised some questions and issues about law when it comes to protected areas and how green spaces are degrating in time or how can we conserve the site. This questions can lead to an intersting discussion and raise awerness on this important issues. Even though the author admits his subjectivity on the case he present very relevant information on the site. The analytic drawings are very well done with clear information that puts firmly the site in the urban context and showing the good and bad parts that can imediatly lead to proposals. After this good documentation and analyzing of the site the proposals came naturally. I like the author's perspective on non aggresive interventions that do not change the site characteristics but improve its value through punctual functional proposals that are developing the area of the park.

CASE C: MFO-Park by Carolina Esteves Flores

Radu - absent for the pressentation,(feedback based on wiki page) : The author presented an interesting case that is meant to show good practices in using an old industrial area and transforming it in a useble, recreational park through planting design. The architects that designed the site used climbers to cover the metal bars from the site. This gave a distinctiv look that quickly became a landmark of the city. The documentation is well done, making clear about the context and the plants that are used. One of the most important fact about this case is that they used a high variability of plant species so the changing of the seansons can realy change the perspectives on the site through the changing colors of the flowers and foliage. The author highlights the iportance of using season changing in your advantage through planting design. The analytic drawings make a clear idea about the context of the site and shows the author's main issue on using plants that give distinct feelings in different seasons. The projective drawings are demonstrating the positive example of "bringing to life old industrial non functional areas", through planting design. The human intervention should only start the natural way of vegetation invading not usable space and creating a very unique site.