Working Group Open Spaces: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Heike.kaiser (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
to all | '''Notes:''' | ||
* The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate all questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th. | |||
* People who did not attend the session on 3rd of December may have additional proposals for core questions or join a responsible person to one of the core questions above. Feel free to add questions as proposals to the list above and discuss it via e-mail or using the discussion page. | |||
* Please integrate the questions soon and try to deliver some draft answers before December 15th - otherwise it will become difficult to create a synthesis report for December 19th. | |||
== Minutes this Working Group == | == Minutes this Working Group == |
Revision as of 07:30, 5 December 2008
Case Studies of this working group
The list includes all case studies categorised in this group and the respective answers to the first question "Rationale:Why is this case study interesting?"
Attention: this is a dynamic page list, do not edit this paragraph!
<DPL>
category=Working Group Open Spaces mode=ordered include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?
</DPL>
Core Questions of this Working Group
Please list the core questions identified.
- How can the design of an open space contribute to a run down neighbourhood? [Sofia]
- How are open spaces linked to the adjacent area (e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, river)? [
- How are open spaces used (e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does an open space fullfil)?
- Which elements make an open space successful and attractive? [Eunan] [Yujun]
- How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? [Salome]
Notes:
- The names behind the questions identify those people that take up a kind of editor's responsibility for the questions. All group members are asked to integrate all questions into their case study report. The respective question editors will then compile the different answers and report back to the group plenary on December 19th.
- People who did not attend the session on 3rd of December may have additional proposals for core questions or join a responsible person to one of the core questions above. Feel free to add questions as proposals to the list above and discuss it via e-mail or using the discussion page.
- Please integrate the questions soon and try to deliver some draft answers before December 15th - otherwise it will become difficult to create a synthesis report for December 19th.