GWL Terrain in Amsterdam: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:


=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===
  [[
    community:_ housing is aimed at a social mix of families, singles and the elderly contributing to the varied types on offer in the complex. The creation of a strong community is fostered not just within for the residents of the development; the retail, public and community aspects of the design also ensure that the surrounding community is not shut out.
[units:_600 residential units (300 social rented +150 subsidized sale + 150 market price sale)]
    space:_the main idea of the space in project was to provide much-needed housing but in a way where its environmental impacts were minimized and green space within the development -a rarity in inner Amsterdam –maximized
    parking system:_the development is car-free in its interior _the only parking spaces available were created on the edge of the complex (110 parking spaces for residents and 25 for visitors located on the southern periphery of the site)(110 people had to sell their car because they weren’t able to get a parking space! :-) _located less than 3 km from central Amsterdam very well connected to surrounding bus, tram and train.


]]


=== Author's personal background ===
=== Author's personal background ===

Revision as of 12:10, 19 January 2010

back to Project Biography List

Name add project name
Place add project location
Country add country
Author(s) add your name (optional)
Completion Please enter the date of completion
Client Please enter the client
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Projectimage.jpg



Author's personal background

Please make a short note on your professional background

Process Biography Scheme

Please add the scheme of your project's process biography here, below you see an example. Please replace this file with your own.

Process biography example

Who initiated the project and why?

When was public participation most intensive?

Which participation tools have been applied?

On which level of participation?

Which stakeholders have been involved?

Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public?

Who made the major decisions and when?

Back to top

Image Gallery

Back to top

References


back to Project Biography List