Urban Redevelopment Eisring Süd in Vienna, Austria: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Barbara Birli''
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Barbara Birli''
|-
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently nder construction, planned to be finished 2012''
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2012''
|-
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''

Revision as of 20:36, 4 January 2010

back to Project Biography List

Name Eisring Sued, Vienna
Place Vienna, 10th District
Country Austria
Author(s) Barbara Birli
Completion currently under construction, planned to be finished 2012
Client Please enter the client
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
New project image.jpg


Rationale: Why is this case interesting?

This case is an example for a project that should have had better public participation. Although cititzens were involved in the project and formed interest groups no public particiation took place in the actual planning phase, which kept the actual participation level to a minimum. So although one may say that the public was formally involved the actual input was kept low.

The project is about to be built - neighbours have formed groups to fight against the project, it is about to come into a hot phase...

Author's personal background

I am an educated landscape architect and mediator for civil rights in Austria, with a special education for mediation in planning (mediation for groups of more than 2 persons) Currently I work at Vienna University of Technology and for ECLAS

Process Biography Scheme

This scheme showes how ideal public participation might have looked like

Eisring sued scheme1.jpg

Who initiated the project and why?

When was public participation most intensive?

Which participation tools have been applied?

On which level of participation?

Which stakeholders have been involved?

Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public?

Who made the major decisions and when?

Back to top

Image Gallery

Back to top

References


back to Project Biography List