|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| 27.05.2009(first meeting with the special groups)-Group2
| |
|
| |
|
| Step:1
| |
|
| |
| 1.Thelma Hisayasu and Paulo Pellegrino
| |
| Agriculture in Sao-Paulo Urban Fringe
| |
| South of San-Paulo:
| |
| - Flooding area
| |
| -Biosphere Reserve Area-city is in this area
| |
|
| |
| How agriculture is important for the city
| |
| -It is traditional(part of the green belt)
| |
| -Agriculture sites in forets also
| |
| -Creating integration in the city
| |
|
| |
| 2.Isin Barut
| |
| Green Links for Wilhelmsburg
| |
|
| |
| -Wilhelmsburg is a district of Hamburg
| |
| -Europes biggest river island
| |
| -Inhabitants from different nationalities
| |
| -Creating green links for developping the statüe of the island
| |
| -Design and planning together
| |
|
| |
| 3.Aycim Baskaya
| |
| Istanbul as a Metropolitan City
| |
| -Biggest city of Turkey
| |
| -Urban growing, land fills and urban fringe
| |
| 1990-unfunctional urban fringe areas(nowadays they are surronding with residentals
| |
| -Problems:Non functional peri-urban, urban areas, lanscape changes
| |
|
| |
| 4.Emel Baylan
| |
| Van City and Lake
| |
| -Geographic location of Van-iranian boarder
| |
| -Lake Van-biggest lake of Turkey
| |
| -Rural area in different aspects(life qualities,areas etc)
| |
| -What can lansdcape planning do in contributing rural development
| |
| Increase the quality of life styles
| |
| -Lake lansdcapes effects of the Urban area
| |
|
| |
| Step-2) Clustering themes(2-4)
| |
|
| |
| -Agriculture in the urban fringe
| |
| -Agriculture as a green infrastructure element
| |
| -Green infrastructure
| |
| -Aesthetic quality
| |
| -Quality of life in rur-urban areas
| |
| -Flexibility of life styles
| |
| -Environmental quality
| |
| -Creating green links for wholeness
| |
| -Greenbelt, agriculture as a part of it
| |
| -Where rural starts
| |
| -Rur-urban
| |
| -Monitoring land-use change
| |
| -Integration in an urban area
| |
| -Dynamics flows between urban and peri-urban areas
| |
|
| |
| Step-3) Discussion of themes
| |
| -Small introduction from participants about their offered core-themes
| |
| -connections of the themes
| |
| -Finding questions of the connected themes
| |
|
| |
| 1.How may landscape architecture contribute to integration of different age groups,ethnics etc in urban fringe?
| |
| -integration in an urban area
| |
| -quality of life in rur-urban areas
| |
| -flexiblity of life styles
| |
|
| |
| 2.How can the transformation process be connected with the landscape sub-typologies?
| |
|
| |
| 3.How may landscape planning contribute to quality improvement?
| |
|
| |
| 4.The maintenance and development of agricultural land-use in urban fringes can be a strategy of a greenbelt?
| |