Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 50: Line 50:




<gallery caption=" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Line 58: Line 58:
== What are the objectives of your design? ==
== What are the objectives of your design? ==


- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.
- To '''revive and revitalize''' the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.


- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.
- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.
Line 79: Line 79:
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''


<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">


Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Line 87: Line 87:
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences  
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences  
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 92: Line 93:
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''


<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Aligne.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish  an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>
</gallery>


== Design Synthesis ==
== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''


<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
 
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis  drawing 3
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis  drawing 4
 
</gallery>
 
<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
Image:Biotope conceptual planting design.jpg|Biotope conceptual planting design: Biotope conceptual planting design
Image:Proposed plant species Page 1.jpg|Proposed plant species Page 1
Image:Proposed plant species Page 2.jpg|PProposed plant species Page 2
</gallery>Proposed plant species Page 2


== Summary of the collaborative process ==
== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''
 
Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively  for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.


== Image Gallery ==
== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''


<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
Image:IMG 1239.JPG|Caravan onsite indicative camping actives
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Site as visible from Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1268.JPG|Landfill area adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1291.JPG|Sand dunes that have formed overtime
</gallery>
</gallery>


== References ==
== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''  
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''  


''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''
NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.
''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''


''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''
''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''





Latest revision as of 20:29, 18 February 2014

---> back to group page working group 2

Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site


Name Project Biotope
Location Forchheim
Country Germany
Authors Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James
24.JPG

Landscape and/or urban context of your case

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the StadtPark (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.


SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a BIOTOPE (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.


BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving. The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.


DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.


OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.


What are the objectives of your design?

- To revive and revitalize the site area and give it a new identity.

- To analyse the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the usage pattern and possibilities.

- Understanding the urban context and its influence on the project at a micro and macro level and vice-versa.

- Explore various typologies of 'Biotopes' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a cultural context and create a landmark in the region.

- To use the site as an interactive domain to connect nature and people.

- To create an educative and recreational landscape while keeping interventions minimal.

- To add a green corridor along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

Analytical drawings

Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.

Projective drawings

Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.

Design Synthesis

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing. Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).


Proposed plant species Page 2

Summary of the collaborative process

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy. The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives. It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary. In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same. In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

Image Gallery

You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings

References

* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below. The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg

Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery



About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "", add your categories