Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 4: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==


* Our 2.5 hectares site is bounded by an old oak lane and small canals. This site is part of a bigger 107 hectares landscape arboretum with many rare species from all over the world. The idea of colleting many rear trees and shrubs was less important than the design and appearance of the English landscape inspired park. Many landscape architects such as Russell Page helped to realize this idea.
* The Eastern border of our 2.5 hectare big site consists of an old oak lane and narrow water channels in the West. This site is part of a bigger 107 hectares landscape garden / arboretum featuring many rare trees and shrubs from all over the world. The idea of collecting many rear trees and shrubs because of their botanical interest was less important than the design and the general appearance of the English landscape inspired park. Many landscape architects such as Russell Page helped to realize this idea.


* Short history of the site:
* Short history of the site
During the Middle Ages there was a lot of deforestation in Belgium and the rest of Western Europe. After a while wood became scarce and it could no longer be used as firewood. So there was a need of a new substitute. Since the beginning of the 13th Century people began to use peat as a heating. The manual harvesting of peat created micro-landscapes that can still be found on our site. The transport of peat was done by small boats on small canals. The ‘Spillebeek’ is a remainder of this canals. At the end of the 17th Century the area ran out of peat. So the land needed a new function. Agriculture and forestry was the most profitable at that time. So the landscape changed and consisted mainly out of forest and grassland. In 1798: After the French Revolution The French Republic sold the property. This made an end to a 7 Century long Abbey Farm. The property became an estate that changed from owners over the centuries. These estates became self-sufficient and isolated from its environment. During these times farms and other buildings were built with materials from the site. The bricks were made in stone ovens from clay that was found on site. This again enforced the micro-landscapes. The house that is on the site was close to the stone ovens. It was here that the foreman of the stone ovens lived. The house was renovated in the 1990’. Since 1961 the 107 hectares site became property of the family ‘De Belder’ who changed it into a landscape arboretum as we know it in its full glory today.
During the Middle Ages there was a lot of deforestation throughout Belgium and western Europe. After a while wood became scarce and it could no longer be used as firewood. Suddenly there was a need for a new energy substitute. So around the beginning of the 13th Century people began to use peat as a substitute. The manual harvesting of peat created micro-landscapes that can still be found on our site. The transport of peat was done by small boats on narrow channels. Within the ‘Spillebeek area’  one can still find these channels. At the end of the 17th Century the area ran out of peat. So the land needed a new function. Agriculture and forestry were the most profitable at that time. So the landscape changed once again and consisted mainly of forest and grassland. In 1798: After the French Revolution the property was sold off by The French Republic. Thus meant the end to a 7 Century long Abbey Farm. The property became an estate that changed owners a number of times over the centuries. The estates became self-sufficient and isolated from the surrounding environment. During these times farms and other buildings were built with materials from the site. The bricks were made in stone ovens from clay that was found on site. This again increased variety of micro-landscapes that can be found on estate. The house that is on the site was close to the stone ovens. It was here that the foreman of the stone ovens lived. The house was renovated in the 1990’. In 1961 the 107 hectares site has been property of the family ‘De Belder’, who changed it into a landscape arboretum as we know it in its full glory today.
 
* The site is low in maintenance because the renovated house has no current usage. The grass is extensively maintained and mown only 6 times a year. On site we find various sorts of trees and shrubs planted (Quercus, Populus, Picea, Ilex, Betula) or spontaneously (Fraxinus, Alnus, and Rubus). The woody parts are overgrown with plants that came spontaneously (Fraxinus, Alnus, and Rubus or seedlings of Betula, Populus, and Ilex).
* The site is low maintained, because the renovated house has no current usage. The grass is extensively mown (only about 4 times a year).  
On our site there are various sorts of trees and shrubs planted:
  - Quercus robur, Q. petraea
  - Various Populus sorts mainly Populus x canadensis
  - Picea orientalis
  - Ilex aquifolium
  - Betula pendula)  
or spontaneously:
  - Fraxinus excelsior
  - Alnus glutinosa
  - Rubus fruticosa
The woody parts are overgrown with plants that came spontaneously (Fraxinus, Alnus, and Rubus) or by seedlings (of Betula, Populus, and Ilex).


* This is a very dynamic and high potential site with many different and interesting landscape typologies.
* This is a very dynamic and high potential site with many different and interesting landscape typologies.
Line 52: Line 63:


<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Survey sketch Matthieu Mehuys 2014.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:Survey sketch Matthieu Mehuys 2014.jpg|survey
Image:Survey sketch (legend) Matthieu Mehuys 2014.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:Survey sketch (legend) Matthieu Mehuys 2014.jpg|legend survey
Image:Survey topo.jpg|current topographical situation|analytical drawing 3
Image:Survey topo.jpg|current topographical situation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
Image:Habitat.jpg|different habitats
Image:Sun shade.jpg|Sunny and shady spots
Image:Colage.jpg|analysis photos
Image:Sights_Anna_2014.jpg| interesting sights
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 62: Line 76:


<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:Projektive sketch.jpg|Suggestion wild vs. tame 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Planting_concept_MM.jpg|Suggestion open landscape 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:Des_1.jpg|Suggestion short spiritual retreat 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
Image:LEGEND_ANNA.jpg|Legend for the retreat 4
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 72: Line 86:


<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Plan grp4.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis  drawing 2
Image:Sketch_mirror_pond.jpg|mirror pond (Russell Page)
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis  drawing 3
Image:Plants-2.jpg|Peat bead plants
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis  drawing 4
Image:Plants-1.jpg|Grasses
Image:Plants-3.jpg| Plants for Bio-engineering
Image:Sketches_anna2.jpg| Bio-engineering drawing
Image:swot_4.jpg| SWOT analysis
</gallery>
</gallery>


== Summary of the collaborative process ==
== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''
*Anna: on my experience the collaborative design was very useful and helpful, mainly the different approaches came of with a nice and mature design. Also the process includes a feedback between us, what means an improvement of our skills. The most difficult for me was to explain my thoughts without the background of the landscape history, and reflect my ideas on the planting design from another vision different of the engineering. Even so, I used the bio-engineering because is the most close to landscape design. Individually the principal potential was to know about de concept mapping. And the aspect of group work more interestings are the landscape history background and the knowlegde of native species around.


== Image Gallery ==
== Image Gallery ==
Line 85: Line 104:


<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:Design_George_De_Belder_1965_2.jpg|Design John Bergmans 1966
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:IMG_3429.JPG|clumb of Picea orientalis
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:IMG 3433.JPG|multi-stem Fraxinus excelsior
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
Image:IMG 3437.JPG|old renovated house
Image:IMG 3441.JPG|micro-landscape
Image:IMG 3442.JPG|edge
Image:IMG 3447.JPG|wind buffer
Image:IMG 3448.JPG|summer dry pond
Image:IMG 3452.JPG|small canal: 'spillebeek'
Image:IMG 3455.JPG|oak lane
</gallery>
</gallery>


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 09:06, 30 January 2014

---> back to group page working group 4

Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site


Name Arboretum Hemelrijk - Area Spillebeek
Location Essen
Country Belgium
Authors Anna Martinez, Oliver Linder, Matthieu Mehuys
Main picture.jpg

Landscape and/or urban context of your case

  • The Eastern border of our 2.5 hectare big site consists of an old oak lane and narrow water channels in the West. This site is part of a bigger 107 hectares landscape garden / arboretum featuring many rare trees and shrubs from all over the world. The idea of collecting many rear trees and shrubs because of their botanical interest was less important than the design and the general appearance of the English landscape inspired park. Many landscape architects such as Russell Page helped to realize this idea.
  • Short history of the site

During the Middle Ages there was a lot of deforestation throughout Belgium and western Europe. After a while wood became scarce and it could no longer be used as firewood. Suddenly there was a need for a new energy substitute. So around the beginning of the 13th Century people began to use peat as a substitute. The manual harvesting of peat created micro-landscapes that can still be found on our site. The transport of peat was done by small boats on narrow channels. Within the ‘Spillebeek area’ one can still find these channels. At the end of the 17th Century the area ran out of peat. So the land needed a new function. Agriculture and forestry were the most profitable at that time. So the landscape changed once again and consisted mainly of forest and grassland. In 1798: After the French Revolution the property was sold off by The French Republic. Thus meant the end to a 7 Century long Abbey Farm. The property became an estate that changed owners a number of times over the centuries. The estates became self-sufficient and isolated from the surrounding environment. During these times farms and other buildings were built with materials from the site. The bricks were made in stone ovens from clay that was found on site. This again increased variety of micro-landscapes that can be found on estate. The house that is on the site was close to the stone ovens. It was here that the foreman of the stone ovens lived. The house was renovated in the 1990’. In 1961 the 107 hectares site has been property of the family ‘De Belder’, who changed it into a landscape arboretum as we know it in its full glory today.

  • The site is low maintained, because the renovated house has no current usage. The grass is extensively mown (only about 4 times a year).

On our site there are various sorts of trees and shrubs planted:

  - Quercus robur, Q. petraea 
  - Various Populus sorts mainly Populus x canadensis 
  - Picea orientalis
  - Ilex aquifolium
  - Betula pendula) 

or spontaneously:

  - Fraxinus excelsior
  - Alnus glutinosa
  - Rubus fruticosa

The woody parts are overgrown with plants that came spontaneously (Fraxinus, Alnus, and Rubus) or by seedlings (of Betula, Populus, and Ilex).

  • This is a very dynamic and high potential site with many different and interesting landscape typologies.

What are the objectives of your design?

Due to the fact the plot has been managed at a low maintenance ratio, a lot of the garden has succumb to overgrowth and weeds. As the park is not only botanically interesting, but also the way it has been laid out, we see the restoration of the landscape park as the main objective. The first step woud be to do a survey of what was orignally planned and planted and to compare that with what trees and shrubs are still there and growing. A further step towards the restoration, would be to put together a maintenance plan, that would include things like pruning of the trees and shrubs, the removal of invasive and unwanted species and defining grassland maintenance from woodland and wetland maintenance. Since the park is so vastand we have so little time, we have decided on choosing a smaller representative patch within the perimeter. This patch of land has a high density of the various different structural elements, that can be found within the Hemelrijk landscape park. The ideas and principles that we develop for the Spillebeek patch, can then be applied to the rest of the park.

Analytical drawings

Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.

Projective drawings

Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.

Design Synthesis

Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the SWOTanalysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.

Summary of the collaborative process

Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).

  • Anna: on my experience the collaborative design was very useful and helpful, mainly the different approaches came of with a nice and mature design. Also the process includes a feedback between us, what means an improvement of our skills. The most difficult for me was to explain my thoughts without the background of the landscape history, and reflect my ideas on the planting design from another vision different of the engineering. Even so, I used the bio-engineering because is the most close to landscape design. Individually the principal potential was to know about de concept mapping. And the aspect of group work more interestings are the landscape history background and the knowlegde of native species around.

Image Gallery

You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings

References

* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.

* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.

* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.



About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "", add your categories