Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 23: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andreea Webb (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the | Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the group activity was a productive one. | ||
The concept map is fairly detailed and the | The concept map is fairly detailed and overall the group presentation was good as well. | ||
'''Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania''' | '''Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania''' | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 8 January 2014
Feedback from Group 8
Your group seems to have had a good relationship based on communication, as a result the group activity was a productive one. The concept map is fairly detailed and overall the group presentation was good as well.
Case Study A - Union Square, Iasi, Romania
Case Study B - Eko o ni Baje Garden, Lagos
Case Study C - Hudson Road Recovery, Argentina