Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 21: Difference between revisions
Adina.matroz (talk | contribs) |
Adina.matroz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
-Good analysis of visual compositional aspects, heighlighting the positive (viewpoints, social aspects) with the potentials(focal points) and the negative (lack of variety in the natural elements and height of proportions) | -Good analysis of visual compositional aspects, heighlighting the positive (viewpoints, social aspects) with the potentials(focal points) and the negative (lack of variety in the natural elements and height of proportions) | ||
-Very simple and good visual projective drawings, but a short description on the type of vegetation used, and maybe an proposal on the functional use of the chosen site, with the impact it would have for the people(eg. picnic areas for the residential area, sitting areas, ecological corridors- more restricted areas for people ). The relation with the water element is a very important statement that I would have personally liked to have been speculated a bit more. | -Very simple and good visual projective drawings, but a short description on the type of vegetation used, and maybe an proposal on the functional use of the chosen site, with the impact it would have for the people(eg. picnic areas for the residential area, sitting areas, ecological corridors- more restricted areas for people ). The relation with the water element is a very important statement that I would have personally liked to have been speculated a bit more. | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 22 December 2013
Super.
Feedback case study A
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Based on wiki page
Rationale There is a lot described about the university, but it’s not clear why you choose this case and what’s the problem (maybe there isn’t, but then you should put that down). It may help if you describe more about the plantation of the case, that is missing.
Authors perspective I see that you are a former student of the university, but I miss the part where you describe your perspective, how you look at the case, what you think about it.
Context It’s good that you describe the context of the university and the plantation of the campus. This helps to get a view of the place. Is the university itself your case of the campus around the university? If it’s the last, I would describe what’s around the campus and not what’s in the campus.
Analytical drawings Your drawings seems catered, but it is easier to read if you give titles to the drawings. Drawing 1 – The picture is clear and understandable, but I don’t know what you want me to see there.. Drawing 2 - This is a very good drawing! It shows how much the plantation changed. The circles are very helpful to see this change! Drawing 3 - What do you want to say with this picture? How big the trees are? Drawing 4 – This map is very good to see the context of your case, and it is clear now what your case area is.
Projective drawings This is not present
Conclusion This is not present
Image gallery/ references -
Resume You have made a good start, but you should make clear what you want to do with this case, it does not come forward at Rationale, in your perspective or you analytical drawings.
Feedback case study C
-Good analysis of visual compositional aspects, heighlighting the positive (viewpoints, social aspects) with the potentials(focal points) and the negative (lack of variety in the natural elements and height of proportions)
-Very simple and good visual projective drawings, but a short description on the type of vegetation used, and maybe an proposal on the functional use of the chosen site, with the impact it would have for the people(eg. picnic areas for the residential area, sitting areas, ecological corridors- more restricted areas for people ). The relation with the water element is a very important statement that I would have personally liked to have been speculated a bit more.