Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 2: Difference between revisions
Helenapatra (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Group 9 feedback to group 2: Presentation: Case study A: Positive feedback: -considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in sum...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Group 9 feedback to group 2: | Group 9 feedback to group 2: | ||
Presentation: | Presentation:You had technical problems during the presentation on 4th of Dec. | ||
Case study A: | Case study A: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
-considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in summer/winter answers to the questions raised, and the image is very suggestive | -considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in summer/winter answers to the questions raised, and the image is very suggestive | ||
Constructive criticism: would have wished to see near to the Landscape and/or urban context of your case a sketch with the ponds. -sketch is neat and descriptive, however small text explaining shortly what the sketch contains would do even better -2nd prospective drawing is quite unclear, yet the intention and the vision is very clear. | Constructive criticism: would have wished to see near to the Landscape and/or urban context of your case a sketch with the ponds. -sketch is neat and descriptive, however small text explaining shortly what the sketch contains would do even better -2nd prospective drawing is quite unclear, yet the intention and the vision is very clear. | ||
Case study B: | |||
Case study B:Pls upgrade your projective drawings. | |||
Case study C: | Case study C: | ||
It is nice to see historical pictures | |||
You have described your case study very good and exact | |||
you have nice and clear represented sketches | |||
Very well documented and structured case study. | |||
Latest revision as of 10:00, 13 December 2013
Group 9 feedback to group 2: Presentation:You had technical problems during the presentation on 4th of Dec.
Case study A: Positive feedback: -considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in summer/winter answers to the questions raised, and the image is very suggestive Constructive criticism: would have wished to see near to the Landscape and/or urban context of your case a sketch with the ponds. -sketch is neat and descriptive, however small text explaining shortly what the sketch contains would do even better -2nd prospective drawing is quite unclear, yet the intention and the vision is very clear.
Case study B:Pls upgrade your projective drawings.
Case study C: It is nice to see historical pictures
You have described your case study very good and exact
you have nice and clear represented sketches
Very well documented and structured case study.