Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study. | Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study. | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 12 December 2013
Group 9 feedback to group 2: Presentation:You had technical problems during the presentation on 4th of Dec.
Case study A: Positive feedback: -considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in summer/winter answers to the questions raised, and the image is very suggestive Constructive criticism: would have wished to see near to the Landscape and/or urban context of your case a sketch with the ponds. -sketch is neat and descriptive, however small text explaining shortly what the sketch contains would do even better -2nd prospective drawing is quite unclear, yet the intention and the vision is very clear.
Case study B:Pls upgrade your projective drawings.
Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study.