Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 2: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study.
Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study.
            It is nice to see historical pictures
            you have nice and clear represented sketches

Revision as of 20:47, 12 December 2013

Group 9 feedback to group 2: Presentation:You had technical problems during the presentation on 4th of Dec.

Case study A: Positive feedback: -considering urban context of the case is good aproach -making difference between landscape in summer/winter answers to the questions raised, and the image is very suggestive Constructive criticism: would have wished to see near to the Landscape and/or urban context of your case a sketch with the ponds. -sketch is neat and descriptive, however small text explaining shortly what the sketch contains would do even better -2nd prospective drawing is quite unclear, yet the intention and the vision is very clear.

Case study B:Pls upgrade your projective drawings.

Case study C:Very well documented and structured case study.

            It is nice to see historical pictures
            you have nice and clear represented sketches