Food in the Neigbourhood of Madrid: Difference between revisions

From Wikienfk5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:


=== Author's personal background ===
=== Author's personal background ===
''Please make a short note on your professional background''
Students of Architecture in (ETSAM Politechnic University of Madrid)and in (University of studies of Cagliari).
Students of Architecture in (ETSAM Politechnic University of Madrid)and in (University of studies of Cagliari).
Students in first and second year of Master
Students in first and second year of Master
Line 68: Line 67:
Image:huerto2.jpg|
Image:huerto2.jpg|
Image:comunidad.jpg|
Image:comunidad.jpg|
Image:huerto.jpg|
Image:parlamadrid copia.jpg|
</gallery>
<gallery caption=" " widths="720px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
Image:equipamientos size.jpg|
Image:equipamientos size.jpg|
Image:parlamadrid copia.jpg|
</gallery>
Image:Planoparlabonito.jpg|
<gallery caption=" " widths="720px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
Image:20070902115317-huerto.jpg|
Image:equipamientos size.jpg|
Image:huerto.jpg|
Image:plano idea.jpg|
Image:plano idea.jpg|
Image:V5.jpg|
</gallery>
Image:V6.jpg|


</gallery>


[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]
[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

Latest revision as of 15:19, 5 May 2010

back to Project Biography List

Name Food in the Neigbourhood
Place Parla, Madrid
Country Spain
Author(s) Virginia Gutierrez Pascual, Michele Coppola, Maria Buey Gonzalez
Completion Please enter the date of completion
Client City Council of Parla
Project costs Please enter the costs (if known)
Parlacopia.jpg


Rationale: Why is this case interesting?

Nowadays the urbanism in Spain and specially in the city of Madrid is not in its best moment beacuse of the speculation. For this reason is easy to find examples of bad practices of urbanism. For example is often to see disgragated neighbourhoods in wich people need to take the car for almost every movement; there is not functional mix ifnot there are parts of the city for residential uses other for industry of bussines and finally the services sector congregates in big malls. For that reason the aim of our project is to make a neighbourhood where you can find almost all you need. The speciall point is the posibility of grow your own food with the design of gardens integrated with the residential buildings.

Author's personal background

Students of Architecture in (ETSAM Politechnic University of Madrid)and in (University of studies of Cagliari). Students in first and second year of Master Practic work in the Alberto Morell studio.

Process Biography Scheme

Mapa conceptual cronologico-copy.jpg

Who initiated the project and why?

The idea of promoting this kind of project was a common interest between the ecological groups and the public administration in order to fix this critical situation of the environment.

When was public participation most intensive?

With the first presentation of the project to the public, people was very sceptic about it because they find very hard to believe in the potential of the project; especially in the fact of cultivate their own food, because it was a very uncommon idea and people diden't trust it. Then after some meetings with people, where we had the opportunity to explain properly and in a cloeser way our idea, people starts to understand and believe in the possibilities of the project; since that moment people starts asking their questions and finding answers to their doubts. Next step was when people starts showing us the new ideas for improove the project, and it was the most important amazing moment because it was a really participatory work.

Which participation tools have been applied?

At first the main tool has been an exibition in a congress building with the main images and the ideas of our projecet that we thought could be the most interesting and rappresentative for the people. We have designed a rappresentative symbol of our work with wich we designed pins, t-shirts and posters that we hanged up around all the city. The idea was to pick the attention of the people, and to make them closer to the project. After this first step, we go into a more serious comunication when we started the colloquy and all that things. We showed more concret informations and points wich could be interesting for their lifes. We prepared summaries, videos, and digital informations as virtual tours of the future neigborhood.

Which stakeholders have been involved?

First at all the citizens and future tenants; also of course the city council and all the burocratic organism. Also the ecological groups and the promoters.

Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public?

In July the project has been presented to the public in a show in a congress building, where we showed the main ideas and symbol to describe our project to the people. It has gave us also the opportunity to develope our marketing.

Who made the major decisions and when?

The most influent figures where in one hand the city council because our project had to be in according with the legislation and the ordination. In other hand the promotor had a lot of influence because of the high cost of some points of our project. We had to redisigned that points in order to reduce costs. We also paid attention to the ecological exigences because that it was one of the main intentions of our project.

Image Gallery


Back to top

References


back to Project Biography List