Working Group Nature Conservation - Revision history

WikiSysop: /* Answers of the Case Studies */

2013-08-03T14:41:28Z

Answers of the Case Studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 3 August 2013
Line 202:		Line 202:
	==== Answers of the Case Studies ====		==== Answers of the Case Studies ====
	Barbara		Barbara
	<~~DPL~~>		<DynamicPageList>
	category=Working Group Nature Conservation		category=Working Group Nature Conservation
	mode=ordered		mode=ordered
	include = #What is the role of water?		include = #What is the role of water?
	</~~DPL~~>		</DynamicPageList>

	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
	Barbara		Barbara

WikiSysop: /* Answers of the Case Studies */

2013-08-03T14:40:58Z

Answers of the Case Studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 3 August 2013
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Emel		Emel

	<~~DPL~~>		<DynamicPageList>
	category=Working Group Nature Conservation		category=Working Group Nature Conservation
	mode=ordered		mode=ordered
	include = #What is the role of user groups?		include = #What is the role of user groups?
	</~~DPL~~>		</DynamicPageList>

	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

Dali at 17:00, 28 January 2009

2009-01-28T17:00:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 28 January 2009
Line 194:		Line 194:


	[[Image:Urban_vs.natural_table.jpg\|left\|thumb]] [[Image:Graphic.jpg\|center\|thumb]]		[[Image:Urban_vs.natural_table.jpg\|left\|thumb\|Graphic:Mirjana Jovanovic]] [[Image:Graphic.jpg\|center\|thumb\|Graphic:Jovana Kovacevic and Nada Jadzic]]

	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

Dali at 20:39, 26 January 2009

2009-01-26T20:39:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 26 January 2009
Line 185:		Line 185:

	Human is the one that changes the natural environment, by creating conditions that are suitable for humans, but not necessarily for the rest of the nature. Sometimes creating these conditions include conservation, limitation of use, revitalization, renaturalisation....		Human is the one that changes the natural environment, by creating conditions that are suitable for humans, but not necessarily for the rest of the nature. Sometimes creating these conditions include conservation, limitation of use, revitalization, renaturalisation....
	Reversing the process of nature degradation it also mutual note for all case studies. This way of preservation, by looking back in time and trying to revive the nature as it was before degradation, or leaving it the way it is, or making the new nature, are mechanisms of a conscience ~~beeing~~ that is aware of its surroundings and is trying to mate urban and natural.		Reversing the process of nature degradation it also mutual note for all case studies. This way of preservation, by looking back in time and trying to revive the nature as it was before degradation, or leaving it the way it is, or making the new nature, are mechanisms of a conscience being that is aware of its surroundings and is trying to mate urban and natural.

	Natural and urban, working together, must both be allowed to express them as a major determinant of urban and regional form. It is up to architects, landscape architects, engineers, biologists and most importantly legal authorities to show the right way. Legal authorities have the most significal importance, that is shown is all case studies: protection in the case of the Great War Island, government support in Viikki and Hangzhou , exploitation in Lake Mogan and High Island, renaturalisation in River Liseing.		Natural and urban, working together, must both be allowed to express them as a major determinant of urban and regional form. It is up to architects, landscape architects, engineers, biologists and most importantly legal authorities to show the right way. Legal authorities have the most significal importance, that is shown is all case studies: protection in the case of the Great War Island, government support in Viikki and Hangzhou , exploitation in Lake Mogan and High Island, renaturalisation in River Liseing and Parque de Educação Ambiental Professor Mello Barreto.

	~~We’~~ we applied SWOT analysis to show this urban-natural interaction. In the most of the case studies city is weakness and threat to nature, but also the opportunity for nature to survive; on the other hand, nature in urban structure is strength, but a very fragile creation that without human support cannot survive in this urban-natural habitat.		We'we applied SWOT analysis to show this urban-natural interaction. In the most of the case studies city is the weakness and the threat to nature, but also the opportunity for nature to survive; on the other hand, nature in urban structure is the strength, but a very fragile creation that without human support cannot survive in this urban-natural habitat.
			Graphic shows the position of every case study on the scale degradation-recuperation.

Guqinyi: /* Synthesis */

2009-01-25T05:44:57Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 25 January 2009
Line 104:		Line 104:
	</DPL>		</DPL>
	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
	~~'''~~Chinyi~~'''~~ and (Daliborka and Jovana)		Chinyi and Daliborka and Jovana

	From Chinyi		From Chinyi

Dali at 15:08, 24 January 2009

2009-01-24T15:08:50Z

@@ Line 181: / Line 181: @@
 |}
 From Daliborka and Jovana
 [[Image:Urban_vs.natural_table.jpg|left|thumb]]   [[Image:Graphic.jpg|center|thumb]]

Emelbaylan: /* Synthesis */

2009-01-22T18:12:48Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 22 January 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:
	[[Image:USERGROUP2.jpg]]		[[Image:USERGROUP2.jpg]]

	[[Image:~~USERGROUP1~~.jpg]]		[[Image:user group and roles analysis copy.jpg]]

	=== What is the role of the city? ===		=== What is the role of the city? ===

Vertainenv: /* Synthesis */

2009-01-22T13:35:24Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 22 January 2009
Line 90:		Line 90:


	[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY.~~jpg~~\|thumb\|none\|400px]]		[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY.JPG\|thumb\|none\|400px]]
			[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY_2.JPG\|thumb\|none\|400px]]

	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

Vertainenv: /* Synthesis */

2009-01-22T13:17:27Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 22 January 2009
Line 77:		Line 77:
	- Is the city affecting to the status of the nature area? Is the area protected or is there some uncertainty with the status and the future of the nature area?		- Is the city affecting to the status of the nature area? Is the area protected or is there some uncertainty with the status and the future of the nature area?

	There were a lot of similarities with the location of the case study areas: most of them were under strong influence of built environment and human in the city structure. Usually there were still quite good ecological connections left to the ~~other~~ surrounding nature areas. In many cases the ecological connection was water related: a river or a lake environment.		There were a lot of similarities with the location of the case study areas: most of them were under strong influence of built environment and human in the city structure. Usually there were still quite good ecological connections left to the surrounding nature areas. In many cases the ecological connection was water related: a river or a lake environment.

	The closeness of the city was affecting to all of the case study areas: in most of the cases there exists for example recreational use, littering and pollution, which are affecting to the nature and landscape values of the area. There was no high pressure of housing to spread to the nature areas: the reason for that may be that the case study areas were usually not that favourable land for building.		The closeness of the city was affecting to all of the case study areas: in most of the cases there exists for example recreational use, littering and pollution, which are affecting to the nature and landscape values of the area. There was no high pressure of housing to spread to the nature areas (urban sprawl): the reason for that may be that the case study areas were usually not that favourable land for building.

	The values of the nature areas were mostly recognised and the status of the area were usually somehow protected. In many cases national legislation and/or town planning is protecting the nature areas, but there might still be problems with inadequate supervision or lack of control or irresponsible use of the area. The recreational or economical use of the area is in many cases too strong and that causes disadvantages for organisms of nature.		The values of the nature areas were mostly recognised and the status of the area were usually somehow protected. In many cases national legislation and/or town planning is protecting the nature areas, but there might still be problems with inadequate supervision or lack of control or irresponsible use of the area. The recreational or economical use of the area is in many cases too strong and that causes disadvantages for organisms of nature.

	In most of the cases it seems that the process of protecting and recognising nature area is still on its way and the authorities are still trying to find better balance between the ~~protection~~ and the use. Tools to prevent harms for nature caused by human are in many cases inadequate. As a conclusion one important method to save the nature area with values could probably be the combination of at least regionally recognised status by ~~city~~ plan and the appreciation of the area gained by informing people – the city has the most important role in that work (if the area is administered by the city, and in most of these case studies it probably is so). That combination would provide continuous, strong status of the area and responsible use of the area.		If we compaire the location and the status of the area, it is noticeable that there is a connection between them: If the nature area is located in the urban area, its nature and recreation values are usually appreciated and the area is noticed also in the Master plan of the city. The only clear exception is High Island, which status still seems to be unstable.

			In most of the cases it seems that the process of protecting and recognising nature area is still on its way and the authorities are still trying to find better balance between the nature conservation and the use. Tools to prevent harms for nature caused by human are in many cases inadequate. As a conclusion one important method to save the nature area with values could probably be the combination of at least regionally recognised status by the Master plan and the appreciation of the area gained by informing people, both inhabitants of the neighborhood and visitors of the nature area. The city has the most important role in that work (if the area is administered by the city, and in most of these case studies it probably is so). That combination would provide continuous, strong status of the area and responsible use of the area.

			The difficulty in this synthesis was, that there were not always exact information available of the case study area: it would have been useful to know about the administration of the area and also if the area is marked in the Master pland and if so, what is the marking. So this synthesis is based partly on assumpiton and may have some erroneus interpretations.

Emelbaylan: /* Synthesis */

2009-01-20T16:02:31Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 20 January 2009
Line 53:		Line 53:
	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]
			User Groups in Each Case Area

			[[Image:USERGROUP2.jpg]]

	[[Image:USERGROUP1.jpg]]		[[Image:USERGROUP1.jpg]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 22 January 2009
Line 90:		Line 90:


	[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY.~~jpg~~\|thumb\|none\|400px]]		[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY.JPG\|thumb\|none\|400px]]
			[[Image:THE_ROLE_OF_THE_CITY_2.JPG\|thumb\|none\|400px]]

	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]