Working Group Green Structure Planning - Revision history

WikiSysop: /* Answers of the Case Studies */

2013-08-03T14:45:57Z

Answers of the Case Studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 3 August 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	(MARKUS)		(MARKUS)
	==== Answers of the Case Studies ====		==== Answers of the Case Studies ====
	<~~DPL~~>		<DynamicPageList>
	category=Working Group Green Structure Planning		category=Working Group Green Structure Planning
	mode=ordered		mode=ordered
	include = #How does funding influence the planning and use of public space?		include = #How does funding influence the planning and use of public space?
	</~~DPL~~>		</DynamicPageList>

	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
	(Markus)		(Markus)

WikiSysop: /* Case Studies of this working group */

2013-08-03T14:45:40Z

Case Studies of this working group

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 3 August 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]		[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]

	<~~DPL~~>		<DynamicPageList>
	category=Working Group Green Structure Planning		category=Working Group Green Structure Planning
	mode=ordered		mode=ordered
	include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?		include = #Rationale: Why is this case study interesting?
	</~~DPL~~>		</DynamicPageList>
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

	== Core Questions of this Working Group ==		== Core Questions of this Working Group ==

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:42:17Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 24 February 2009
Line 76:		Line 76:
	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while editing listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while editing listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be ~~realized~~. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods in order to reach this goal are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the ~~way~~ of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square) and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be determined. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims of the case studies lie mainly in connecting areas. This is not astonishing when looking at the main theme of the group. Methods in order to reach this goal are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in something of the kind of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]

	=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===		=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:34:21Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 24 February 2009
Line 47:		Line 47:
	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while adding or improving the listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while adding or improving the listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t ~~realized~~ at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. In this stage it could be realized that when private land has to be purchased first, governmental funding is necessary ~~mostly~~.		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t completed at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. In this stage it could be realized that when private land has to be purchased first in order to reach the planning aims, governmental funding is mostly necessary.

	These similarities between funding and land-use were provided afterwards in a graphical view. ~~Simlar~~ approaches concerning funding like governmental funding or public involvement were added and grouped together. Out of this superior influences as noticed in the different case studies like planning or funding were shown.]		These similarities between funding and land-use were provided afterwards in a graphical view. Similar approaches concerning funding like governmental funding or public involvement were added and grouped together. Out of this superior influences as noticed in the different case studies like planning or funding were shown.]

	=== How are spaces within the site used both currently and projected? ===		=== How are spaces within the site used both currently and projected? ===

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:30:05Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 24 February 2009
Line 74:		Line 74:
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while ~~the participants added or improved~~ listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while editing listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods in order to reach this goal are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods in order to reach this goal are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:29:26Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 24 February 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the ~~participants added or improved~~ listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while adding or improving the listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t realized at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. In this stage it could be realized that when private land has to be purchased first, governmental funding is necessary mostly.		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t realized at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. In this stage it could be realized that when private land has to be purchased first, governmental funding is necessary mostly.

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:20:44Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 24 February 2009
Line 76:		Line 76:
	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods ~~which were used~~ are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods in order to reach this goal are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]

	=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===		=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:19:07Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 24 February 2009
Line 60:		Line 60:

	==== Synthesis ====		==== Synthesis ====
			(Markus)

	[[Image:PETER_Green_Structure_Planning_20012009_Folie_(41).JPG\|thumb\|none\|800px]]		[[Image:PETER_Green_Structure_Planning_20012009_Folie_(41).JPG\|thumb\|none\|800px]]
Line 75:		Line 76:
	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.

	In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods which were used are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water]		In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods which were used are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water. This main land use is never altered. Other land uses mostly adapt to it in the planning sequence of the case studies.]

	=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===		=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:16:58Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 24 February 2009
Line 73:		Line 73:
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data. In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also ~~shows~~ in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods which were used are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools).]		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about the currently and projected space use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. The theme determined the allocation of the table. While the rows contain data about former, existing and projected land-use, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.

			In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The different ways of land-use were depicted in the form of images. The chronology, sequence and various ways of implementation of the planning aims were also shown in a graphical way. In this phase the appearance of a main land use in all case studies came into light. This main feature was highlighted (with a red square)and therefore its different ways through planning and realization phases could be realized. Furthermore it could be realized, that the aims lie mainly in connecting areas. Methods which were used are either preservation (shown with two hands holding a plant) or maintaining (shown with gardening tools). As an outcome of the case studies the huge influence of a main land use in the way of a mainspring in planning and projecting could be determined. Especially when it is a natural element like water]

	=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===		=== How can the historic elements / layers be integrated? ===

Markus Peter: /* Synthesis */

2009-02-24T19:11:07Z

Synthesis

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 24 February 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

	['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data. In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t realized at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. These similarities between funding and land-use were provided afterwards in a graphical view. Simlar approaches concerning funding like governmental funding or public involvement were added and grouped together. Out of this superior influences as noticed in the different case studies like planning or funding were shown.]		['''Approach:''' In the first step relevant information about funding and land use were carried together out of the case studies and inserted into a table. While the rows contain data about funding itself, the columns reveal the different case studies. Missing information were exchanged by e-mail, while the participants added or improved listed data.

			In a next step the information in the table were compressed into the more relevant issues and simplified. The first row in this next table contains a graphical view about the money spent in the different case studies. As some of the case studies aren`t realized at the moment, these informations are missing there. Furthermore similarities between the case studies were sought and highlighted. In this stage it could be realized that when private land has to be purchased first, governmental funding is necessary mostly.

			These similarities between funding and land-use were provided afterwards in a graphical view. Simlar approaches concerning funding like governmental funding or public involvement were added and grouped together. Out of this superior influences as noticed in the different case studies like planning or funding were shown.]

	=== How are spaces within the site used both currently and projected? ===		=== How are spaces within the site used both currently and projected? ===