Uggledal - Revision history

130.238.114.111: /* In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? */

2008-12-15T08:50:36Z

In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 15 December 2008
Line 71:		Line 71:

	==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====		==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====
			The focus of the participation for the planner was to preserve what was special and valuable within the area, retaining the characteristics which make the place and which have special meaning to the inhabitants and future inhabitants. However as the future residents were unknown it was the projection of the present locals which were considered, women and school groups. They envisaged that the new “incomers” would be as themselves, young families with ecological ambitions. The reality was is that the projection was wrong and it is more wealthy middle age couples attracted to the aesthetics of the area who have moved in. There was also a “watering down” of ecological ambitions in favour of more aesthetic elements.

	=== Analysis of program/function ===		=== Analysis of program/function ===

130.238.114.111: /* How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? */

2008-12-15T08:39:16Z

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 15 December 2008
Line 67:		Line 67:
	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
	A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.		A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

	~~It was viewed that the input from local men was not needed as their knowledge is rather well known and condidered within planning practice~~

	At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.		At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.

130.238.114.111: /* Who was involved in the participation process? */

2008-12-15T08:38:57Z

Who was involved in the participation process?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 15 December 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:
	==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====		==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
	For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by womens groups and school groups already residing in the area.		For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by womens groups and school groups already residing in the area.

			It was viewed that the input from local men was not needed as their knowledge is rather well known and condidered within planning practice

	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

130.238.114.111: /* How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? */

2008-12-15T08:38:21Z

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 15 December 2008
Line 65:		Line 65:
	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
	A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.		A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

			It was viewed that the input from local men was not needed as their knowledge is rather well known and condidered within planning practice

	At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.		At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.

130.238.114.111: /* How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? */

2008-12-15T08:37:58Z

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 15 December 2008
Line 65:		Line 65:
	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
	A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.		A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

	~~It was viewed that the input from local men was not needed as their knowledge is rather well known and condidered within planning practice~~

	At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.		At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.

130.238.114.111: /* How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? */

2008-12-15T08:37:39Z

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 15 December 2008
Line 65:		Line 65:
	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
	A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.		A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

			It was viewed that the input from local men was not needed as their knowledge is rather well known and condidered within planning practice

	At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.		At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.

130.238.114.111: /* How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? */

2008-12-15T08:23:47Z

How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 15 December 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:

	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
			A parallel competition was instigated between four architect practices, where proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups who were instrumental in the final design, these includes; a women’s group which formed during the programming stage of the project and worked right through the consultation stage; a school group who has lessons on planning in general and the specific project, which provided a base from which to formulate proposals wit the planner The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.
			At the early stages issues of traffic problems, construction of housing on locally valued area and adjacent horse use were addressed and easily addressed.

	==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====		==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

130.238.114.111: /* Who was involved in the participation process? */

2008-12-15T08:15:41Z

Who was involved in the participation process?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 15 December 2008
Line 61:		Line 61:
	=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===		=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
	==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====		==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
	For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by ~~women~~ and ~~children~~ already residing ~~in the area.~~		For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by womens groups and school groups already residing in the area.

	Four proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups and were instrumental in the final design. The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

Abutler: /* Who was involved in the participation process? */

2008-12-08T14:20:15Z

Who was involved in the participation process?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 8 December 2008
Line 63:		Line 63:
	For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by women and children already residing in the area.		For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by women and children already residing in the area.

	Four ~~proposed~~ for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups and were instrumental in the final design. The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.		Four proposals for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups and were instrumental in the final design. The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

Abutler: /* Who was involved in the participation process? */

2008-12-08T14:19:55Z

Who was involved in the participation process?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 8 December 2008
Line 61:		Line 61:
	=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===		=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
	==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====		==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
			For the development of Uggledal the preservation of the areas “green qualities” was considered of significant value, along with ecological integration and sustainable development practices. Early in the process consultation between municipal authorities and residents and actors to provide an exchange of knowledge and views, leading to a deeper understanding of the site and its issues. Future residents were represented by among others; current residents, planners, and the property developer, The green issues were represented by local residents’ groups, architects and other experts. Future requirements and locations which were too valuable to be built on where identified by women and children already residing in the area.

			Four proposed for the area where drawn up which were considered by three citizen groups and were instrumental in the final design. The citizen groups were made up of anybody who was interested in the process but not necessarily interested in living in the area.

	==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====		==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
	==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====		==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====