Dianaculescu at 11:14, 11 December 2013

2013-12-11T11:14:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 11 December 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:

	>would be good to hear more of relationship with culture and nature on the site		>would be good to hear more of relationship with culture and nature on the site

			'''>clear connection to seminal theme'''

Dianaculescu: Created page with "'''''feedback for the group presentation on December 4th''''' good group work, the live presentation showed that the team members have been actively collaborating during this..."

2013-12-11T11:07:50Z

Created page with "'''''feedback for the group presentation on December 4th''''' good group work, the live presentation showed that the team members have been actively collaborating during this..."

New page

'''''feedback for the group presentation on December 4th'''''

good group work, the live presentation showed that the team members have been actively collaborating during this assignment, knowing and understanding each other cases and being able to offer a cross analysis over all four case studies

'''''feedback for the wiki presentations'''''

at the wiki pages level, the situation seems somewhat different

'''Case Study A: Hyeyoon Choi'''

>detailed & interesting case study

>good level of information

>good use of photographs to illustrate the site

>analytical drawings do not communicate visually the written analysis

>projective drawings communicate idea effectively, but they don't offer phasing hints

>well written

>well presented in group discussion

'''>clear connection to seminal subject: “natural stream restoration”'''

'''Case Study B: Jeroen Geudens'''

>good case study

>analytical and projective drawings need more explanation (for example in the protective drawings there are no phasing info - which changes will be done on short term and what is envisages on 10-15 years?)

>the case has no references

>would be good to hear more of relationship with culture and nature on the site

'''Case Study C: Maria Duque'''

>very interesting case - clear rationale

>biogeography and cultural features need better description of their relevance to the project

>no analytical or projective drawings which surprising since these elements have been introduced in the live presentation

>nice image gallery

'''>its connection to planting design is not clear'''

'''Case Study D: Ladan Badiei'''

>no image or map

>no author's perspective

>no projective or analytical drawings which is also surprising since some elements were introduced in the live presentation

'''>it is an architectural case and, therefore, its connection with the seminar title is not clear; since there is not enough information to rely on, a clear relation with the seminar theme can’t be establish; it will be very interesting to find out more about this case and how the author makes the connection with the seminar theme'''

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 6 - Revision history

Dianaculescu at 11:14, 11 December 2013

Dianaculescu: Created page with "'''''feedback for the group presentation on December 4th''''' good group work, the live presentation showed that the team members have been actively collaborating during this..."