Lorzenuferweg in Cham, Switzerland - Revision history

Vorkristin: /* Which participation tools have been applied? */

2010-01-29T15:40:01Z

Which participation tools have been applied?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 29 January 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:

	=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===		=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===
	~~Parish Councils,~~
	~~Visits to the locality,~~
	~~Orientation Evenings,~~
	~~Public exhibitions with the opportunity to comment~~

	=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===		=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

2010-01-29T15:39:15Z

Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 29 January 2010
Line 45:		Line 45:

	=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===		=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===
	~~So far, not yet.~~

	=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===		=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

2010-01-29T15:39:02Z

Which stakeholders have been involved?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 29 January 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:

	=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===		=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===
	~~Involving mainly the cantonal agencies, landscape architects, engineers, Forestry, Water Engineers.~~

	=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===		=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

2010-01-29T15:38:49Z

When was public participation most intensive?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 29 January 2010
Line 35:		Line 35:

	=== When was public participation most intensive? ===		=== When was public participation most intensive? ===
	~~Public participation has been particularly intense at the beginning of the project.~~
	~~But even during the various stages, the public very often is involved.~~
	~~It is of great importance for tue publik to identify with this project.~~

	=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===		=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

2010-01-29T15:38:37Z

Author's personal background

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 29 January 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	=== Author's personal background ===		=== Author's personal background ===
	~~Bachelor of in Landscape Architecture in 2009 at Fh Wiesbaden, Fb Geisenheim Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.~~

	=== Process Biography Scheme ===		=== Process Biography Scheme ===

2010-01-29T15:38:26Z

Rationale: Why is this case interesting?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 29 January 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===		=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===
	Because the project affects an urban space and characteristic landscape as well as different ecosystems, the most important challenge is to respond to these issues and protect the delicate resevoir area where rare plants and the Kingfisher nests are. The project " Lorzenuferweg" is created according to the set conditions, the topography, vegetation, and the delta of torrent Lorze.
	~~The trail is planned primarily in terms of soft tourism, man should not significantly affect the nature.~~
	~~The 3.5 km long "Lorzenuferweg" will be part of tue Cham community‘s recreation and networking concept.~~
	~~Various platforms, seats and pulpits serve the people as a resting and insight into the surrounding, protected nature.~~

	=== Author's personal background ===		=== Author's personal background ===

2010-01-29T15:33:17Z

Who made the major decisions and when?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 29 January 2010
Line 57:		Line 57:

	=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===		=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===
	~~The cantonal and municipal offices and the Department of landscape architects and engineers make the important decisions.~~
	~~This happened during the period 2008-2010.~~
	[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]		[[#toc\|'''Back to top''']]

2010-01-29T15:32:45Z

Who initiated the project and why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 29 January 2010
Line 38:		Line 38:

	=== Who initiated the project and why? ===		=== Who initiated the project and why? ===
	~~Who? Cham community~~

	~~Why? So far, the area was not available, there were no structures.~~
	~~To protect the area it is necessary to set out a specific routing.~~
	~~Another goal is to connect Lake Zug with Hagedorn close to the banks of the Lorze for pedestrians.~~

	=== When was public participation most intensive? ===		=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

2010-01-29T15:32:06Z

Process Biography Scheme

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 29 January 2010
Line 36:		Line 36:

	''Please add the scheme of your project's process biography here, below you see an example. Please replace this file with your own.''		''Please add the scheme of your project's process biography here, below you see an example. Please replace this file with your own.''
	~~[[Image:Scheme Lorzenufer1.jpg]]~~

	=== Who initiated the project and why? ===		=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

2010-01-17T18:31:53Z

Process Biography Scheme

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 17 January 2010
Line 36:		Line 36:

	''Please add the scheme of your project's process biography here, below you see an example. Please replace this file with your own.''		''Please add the scheme of your project's process biography here, below you see an example. Please replace this file with your own.''
	[[Image:Scheme ~~Lorzenufer~~.jpg]]		[[Image:Scheme Lorzenufer1.jpg]]

	=== Who initiated the project and why? ===		=== Who initiated the project and why? ===