Case Study Wageningen - Revision history

Avacoco: /* Image Gallery */

2010-11-21T18:49:14Z

Image Gallery

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 21 November 2010
Line 149:		Line 149:
	Image:Eva-4.jpg\|Eva-4.jpg		Image:Eva-4.jpg\|Eva-4.jpg
	Image:Eva-5.jpg\|Eva-5.jpg		Image:Eva-5.jpg\|Eva-5.jpg
			Image:dutchintro-urban-history-NL1.jpg\|Climate analysis
			Image:dutchintro-urban-history-NL.jpg\|Function placement

	</gallery>		</gallery>

Avacoco: /* Cultural/social/political context */

2010-11-21T15:03:59Z

Cultural/social/political context

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 21 November 2010
Line 62:		Line 62:

	* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:		* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:
	'''referee model''', in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.		'''referee model''', in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.
	'''interaction model''', in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.		'''interaction model''', in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.
	With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.		With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.

Avacoco: /* Cultural/social/political context */

2010-11-21T15:03:30Z

Cultural/social/political context

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 21 November 2010
Line 62:		Line 62:

	* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:		* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:
	• '''referee model''', in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.		'''referee model''', in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.
	• '''interaction model''', in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.		'''interaction model''', in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.
	With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.		With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.

Avacoco at 15:02, 21 November 2010

2010-11-21T15:02:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 21 November 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| '''Completion''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''2000 start building, 2005 end building''		\| '''Completion''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''2000 start building, 2005 end building''
	\|-		\|-
	\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| [[Image:~~projectimage~~.~~jpg~~\|300px]]		\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| [[Image:Fig.1_Map.jpg‎\|300px]]
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\|style="background:Lavender"\|		\| \|\|style="background:Lavender"\|

Avacoco at 14:57, 21 November 2010

2010-11-21T14:57:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 21 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	{\| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"		{\| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Name''' \|\|style="background:Lavender"\| ''~~name of project~~''		\| '''Name''' \|\|style="background:Lavender"\| ''EVA Lanxmeer''
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Location''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''~~location~~''		\| '''Location''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''Culemborg''
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Country''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''~~country~~''		\| '''Country''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''Netherlands''
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Office''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''~~office or planner/designer~~''		\| '''Office''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''A dynamic interdisciplinary process ''
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Client''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''~~please enter the client here~~''		\| '''Client''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''E.V.A. foundation''
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Completion''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''~~Please enter the date of completion~~''		\| '''Completion''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|''2000 start building, 2005 end building''
	\|-		\|-
	\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| [[Image:projectimage.jpg\|300px]]		\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| [[Image:projectimage.jpg\|300px]]
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| \|\|style="background:Lavender"\|		\| \|\|style="background:Lavender"\|
	\|-		\|-
	\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="~~-23~~.~~581609~~" lon="~~-46~~.~~590271~~" type="satellite" zoom="9" width="300" height="250">		\| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"\| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="52.09" lon="5.349" type="satellite" zoom="9" width="300" height="250">
	</googlemap>		</googlemap>
	\|}		\|}

Avacoco: /* Analysis of design/planning process */

2010-11-21T14:39:58Z

Analysis of design/planning process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 21 November 2010
Line 121:		Line 121:

	* '''''Were there any important consultations/collaborations?''' ''		* '''''Were there any important consultations/collaborations?''' ''

			* The most important in this process are public consultations, by which the public could have input on the project. By publishing what was going to happen they give people information, also the people of the rest of the city. They also consulted the interest groups on their opinion and used participation to involve the these groups in the making of the plans. This improved the public involvement, transparency of the project, understanding and also the efficiency of the project. That is what we would like to see more in the future.

	=== Analysis of use/users ===		=== Analysis of use/users ===

Avacoco: /* Analysis of design/planning process */

2010-11-21T14:39:33Z

Analysis of design/planning process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 21 November 2010
Line 110:		Line 110:
	=== Analysis of design/planning process ===		=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
	* '''''How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?'''''		* '''''How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?'''''

			'''Formulation of the plan'''

			* In the beginning Eva lanxmeer was just a concept made by scientists. In 1994 they started the Eva Foundation as an ecological center for Education, Information and Advice. The people in this foundation where from a lot of different disciplines, like architecture, landscape architecture, agriculture, healthcare, energy and art. They wanted sustainable planning by combining technology and innovation with environment and behavior. They wanted to realize an example project for an ecological and sustainable way of urbanization.

			'''Implementation of the plan'''

			* Not long after the Eva foundation existed more and more future inhabitants got into this network. They started as a group of people who had no power, but got the project into realization by working their way up toward realization. You could call it Bottom-up approach. That means that the project has not implemented from the top (government). After some while when they saw the importance of sustainability, the Culemborg municipality got involved with the project. The urbanization plan was made by organizing workshops, ateliers en master classes. In this process interdisciplinary people, future inhabitants and the municipality where active.


	* '''''Were there any important consultations/collaborations?''' ''		* '''''Were there any important consultations/collaborations?''' ''

Avacoco: /* Cultural/social/political context */

2010-11-21T14:38:02Z

Cultural/social/political context

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 21 November 2010
Line 62:		Line 62:

	* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:		* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:
	• referee model, in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.		• '''referee model''', in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.
	• interaction model, in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.		• '''interaction model''', in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.
	With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.		With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.

Avacoco: /* Cultural/social/political context */

2010-11-21T14:37:14Z

Cultural/social/political context

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 21 November 2010
Line 53:		Line 53:
	*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework		*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

	'''Culture and politics'''		'''''Culture and politics'''''

	Nowadays people in Netherlands are fighting for spaces. What to do with it? Should we build houses, make nature or place companies? The Netherland is quite small, so we try to think about the choices before changing the landscape and it’s functions. At the moment are people getting more aware of nature and environment. People want space for recreation in a beautiful landscape that is formed by culture and nature. They would like to be more sustainable, but don’t know how to change their habits. The government is trying to influence these habits by stimulating several kinds of projects. Like separation of waste and recycling, or green energy projects.		* Nowadays people in Netherlands are fighting for spaces. What to do with it? Should we build houses, make nature or place companies? The Netherland is quite small, so we try to think about the choices before changing the landscape and it’s functions. At the moment are people getting more aware of nature and environment. People want space for recreation in a beautiful landscape that is formed by culture and nature. They would like to be more sustainable, but don’t know how to change their habits. The government is trying to influence these habits by stimulating several kinds of projects. Like separation of waste and recycling, or green energy projects.

	The Eva lanxmeer project was stimulated to develope in certain ways. They got money from the German Ministry for Education, Science, Technology and Research because they chose Eva Lanxmeer as an European demonstration project. The Dutch Ministry for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment provided subsidies and the project also got some stimulation funds for Architecture.		* The Eva lanxmeer project was stimulated to develope in certain ways. They got money from the German Ministry for Education, Science, Technology and Research because they chose Eva Lanxmeer as an European demonstration project. The Dutch Ministry for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment provided subsidies and the project also got some stimulation funds for Architecture.

	It is also because people are getting more aware of nature, food production, energy systems and water problems, that there is a mark for this kind of sustainable housing projects. It is a good example to inspiration on the citizen’s initiatives.		* It is also because people are getting more aware of nature, food production, energy systems and water problems, that there is a mark for this kind of sustainable housing projects. It is a good example to inspiration on the citizen’s initiatives.

	In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:		* In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:
	• referee model, in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.		• referee model, in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.
	• interaction model, in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.		• interaction model, in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.
	With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.		With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.

Avacoco: /* Cultural/social/political context */

2010-11-21T14:36:06Z

Cultural/social/political context

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 21 November 2010
Line 53:		Line 53:
	*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework		*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

	~~Illustration~~:		'''Culture and politics'''
	~~Bullet~~ points, ~~image, background notes~~
			Nowadays people in Netherlands are fighting for spaces. What to do with it? Should we build houses, make nature or place companies? The Netherland is quite small, so we try to think about the choices before changing the landscape and it’s functions. At the moment are people getting more aware of nature and environment. People want space for recreation in a beautiful landscape that is formed by culture and nature. They would like to be more sustainable, but don’t know how to change their habits. The government is trying to influence these habits by stimulating several kinds of projects. Like separation of waste and recycling, or green energy projects.

			The Eva lanxmeer project was stimulated to develope in certain ways. They got money from the German Ministry for Education, Science, Technology and Research because they chose Eva Lanxmeer as an European demonstration project. The Dutch Ministry for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment provided subsidies and the project also got some stimulation funds for Architecture.

			It is also because people are getting more aware of nature, food production, energy systems and water problems, that there is a mark for this kind of sustainable housing projects. It is a good example to inspiration on the citizen’s initiatives.

			In Netherlands there are generally spoken 2 models of decision making:
			• referee model, in which one person or group decides a matter when there is a conflict, this model places the problem at the opposing individuals and interest groups.
			• interaction model, in which all “partners” in the process have to agree with the decision, in this model the decision makers are the cause the problems.
			With the Eva lanxmeer project the second model for decision making was used. All partners had to declare their willingness at certain points. This participation model is growing in Netherlands, A thing of which we think that should be developed and improved in the future.

	=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===		=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===