Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 20

2014-02-01T23:47:58Z

Ssancheznapal:

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Lecture_-_Current_Aspects_of_Reconsidered_Planting_Design.jpg|''Map from Lecture: Current Aspects of Reconsidered Planting Design''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group 20 n1.JPG|slide 1
Image:Group 20 n2.JPG|slide 2
Image:Group 20 n3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''
We have chosen Case Study B to be the Group Case Study. This is the Alameda Central Park, in Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The important aspect of this park is that has many different "historical planting layers" that interact in a unique way and give the park a mixture of different planting styles.

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20|Collaborative Design Working Group 20]]'''===

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva1.JPG|Presentation Slide 1
Image:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva2.JPG|Presentation Slide 2
Image:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva3.JPG|Presentation Slide 3
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

File:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva3.JPG

2014-02-01T23:47:50Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva2.JPG

2014-02-01T23:47:27Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Assignment4-Group20-Diapositiva1.JPG

2014-02-01T23:46:18Z

Ssancheznapal:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20

2014-01-28T15:05:43Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Alameda Central Park''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Santiago de Compostela''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Spain''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Giuseppe Mieno - Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=42.877898
|lng=-8.549019
|zoom=14
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* This park is the main city park in Santiago de Compostela. It has an historical importance due to the growth and landscape style changes it had over the centuries. This style changes can be seen nowadays in the park if you have the capacity to identify landscape design styles.
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). The main idea to projecting in this park is to help the visitors identify the historical design style's changes all over the park. The visitor should be able to understand how the park grew, and how different styles (from different years) relate in the same place, and how they are sometimes mixed in a single park zone.''

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG1.jpg|Analytical Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:Giuseppe 1.jpg|Analytical Drawing - Giuseppe Mineo
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG2.jpg|Projective Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:Giuseppe 2.jpg|Projective Drawing - Giuseppe Mineo
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG3.jpg|Synthesis Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:Giuseppe 3.jpg|Synthesis Drawing - Giuseppe Mineo
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 20

2014-01-28T14:44:23Z

Ssancheznapal:

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Lecture_-_Current_Aspects_of_Reconsidered_Planting_Design.jpg|''Map from Lecture: Current Aspects of Reconsidered Planting Design''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group 20 n1.JPG|slide 1
Image:Group 20 n2.JPG|slide 2
Image:Group 20 n3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''
We have chosen Case Study B to be the Group Case Study. This is the Alameda Central Park, in Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The important aspect of this park is that has many different "historical planting layers" that interact in a unique way and give the park a mixture of different planting styles.

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20|Collaborative Design Working Group 20]]'''===

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

File:Lecture - Current Aspects of Reconsidered Planting Design.jpg

2014-01-28T14:41:42Z

Ssancheznapal:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20

2014-01-26T15:51:21Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Alameda Central Park''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Santiago de Compostela''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Spain''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=42.877898
|lng=-8.549019
|zoom=14
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* This park is the main city park in Santiago de Compostela. It has an historical importance due to the growth and landscape style changes it had over the centuries. This style changes can be seen nowadays in the park if you have the capacity to identify landscape design styles.
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). The main idea to projecting in this park is to help the visitors identify the historical design style's changes all over the park. The visitor should be able to understand how the park grew, and how different styles (from different years) relate in the same place, and how they are sometimes mixed in a single park zone.''

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG1.jpg|Analytical Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG2.jpg|Projective Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:SanchezNapal-IMG3.jpg|Synthesis Drawing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:SanchezNapal-IMG3.jpg

2014-01-26T15:49:18Z

Ssancheznapal: Design Synthesis - Sebastian Sanchez Napal

Design Synthesis - Sebastian Sanchez Napal

File:SanchezNapal-IMG2.jpg

2014-01-26T15:48:25Z

Ssancheznapal: Projective Drowing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal

Projective Drowing - Sebastian Sanchez Napal

File:SanchezNapal-IMG1.jpg

2014-01-26T15:47:25Z

Ssancheznapal: Analytical Drawing-Sebastian Sanchez Napal

Analytical Drawing-Sebastian Sanchez Napal

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20

2014-01-24T14:56:52Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Alameda Central Park''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Santiago de Compostela''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Spain''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=42.877898
|lng=-8.549019
|zoom=14
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* This park is the main city park in Santiago de Compostela. It has an historical importance due to the growth and landscape style changes it had over the centuries. This style changes can be seen nowadays in the park if you have the capacity to identify landscape design styles.
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). The main idea to projecting in this park is to help the visitors identify the historical design style's changes all over the park. The visitor should be able to understand how the park grew, and how different styles (from different years) relate in the same place, and how they are sometimes mixed in a single park zone.''

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 20

2014-01-15T13:53:31Z

Ssancheznapal:

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:moa.jpg|''your image text, short explanation''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group 20 n1.JPG|slide 1
Image:Group 20 n2.JPG|slide 2
Image:Group 20 n3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''
We have chosen Case Study B to be the Group Case Study. This is the Alameda Central Park, in Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The important aspect of this park is that has many different "historical planting layers" that interact in a unique way and give the park a mixture of different planting styles.

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20|Collaborative Design Working Group 20]]'''===

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 11

2013-12-18T18:44:21Z

Ssancheznapal: Created page with "Comments from group 20: The diversity of cases became interesting. Seeing how each of you choose a Case that has different planting planning and use is interesting when is rea..."

Comments from group 20:
The diversity of cases became interesting. Seeing how each of you choose a Case that has different planting planning and use is interesting when is realized that ecology and natural space regeneration are the key unifying aspect of the three cases.

Personally, I couldn't hear what your opinion was on the relation between how each other analysed its Case and how they are related to one each other. (Sebastian Sanchez Napal, Case A).

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 20

2013-12-18T18:38:07Z

Ssancheznapal:

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:moa.jpg|''your image text, short explanation''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group 20 n1.JPG|slide 1
Image:Group 20 n2.JPG|slide 2
Image:Group 20 n3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 20|Collaborative Design Working Group 20]]'''===

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

File:Group 20 n3.JPG

2013-12-18T18:34:48Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Group 20 n2.JPG

2013-12-18T18:33:39Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Group 20 n1.JPG

2013-12-18T18:33:06Z

Ssancheznapal: Group 20 Presentation 1

Group 20 Presentation 1

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-12-01T22:53:15Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Cerro Campanario Lookout - Interaction between City, National Park and Users'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Cerro Campanario Lookout''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''San Carlos de Bariloche''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Resized_GEDC2391.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=-41.075404
|lng=-71.476965
|zoom=12
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

This lookout allows to look at a different variety of city areas. It located on the top of "Cerro Campanario" (1050 m AMSL) that stands 200 meters above the city.
The sight is interesting in two main ways:
First, from the lookout you can see different areas of '''the city''' and you can see the surrounding '''National Park''' with its mountains, lakes and forests.
Second, the location and main aspect of any lookout should be a place designed by a Landscape Architect: Both '''WHAT''' you look and '''HOW''' you look at a scene are as important as '''WHERE''' you look at it.

* ''Why did you select it?''
I believe that seeing a part of a city at the same time that you see a natural landscape should be well planned view. How this city designs its plot planting design and how this urban plot interacts with the natural landscape, will bring a significant change in what the viewer sees, and how "beautiful" will consider the scene.
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
I believe that user's perception may be a key feature in understanding the difference and interaction between city and natural reserve.

* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''
It slightly related to my life. The Case Study is located in my hometown.

== Author's perspective ==
I am related as a Landscape Architect, because I think lookout points and National Parks are both interesting cases of study and design.
I had the chance to study the main features of this Nahuel Huapi National Park, and different city areas on my Degree Thesis Project.

Taking into consideration that natural and anthropic planting may diverse in the overall order and native species selection.
-Could any effect of anthropic planting and non-native species selection change the "natural perception" of a landscape?
-How much can a natural landscape area could be changed before it is no longer perceived as "natural"?

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
San Carlos de Bariloche is located inside the area of Nahuel Huapi National Park, though the city is not consider as part of it.
City's Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_carlos_de_bariloche
National Park Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuel_Huapi_National_Park
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== Analytical drawings ==
''Schemes and maps that explain the user's view'
* ''Plot Density vs National Park and Natural Reserves''
* ''As it is shown in the maps and schemes, there's a fine line between the two areas. The low plot density may show a more evident planting design and therefore, can appear to be different from a "natural landscape". The "Really Low Density" may appear to be harder to differentiate from both, a Natural and a Low Plot Density''
* ''(More explaining maps and schemes below)''

<gallery caption="Area Mapping " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-Plot-Density.jpg|Plot Density Map
Image:Scheme-Plot-Density.jpg|Lookout Plot Density View
Image:Map-Natural-Reserve.jpg|National Park area and Natural Reserves
Image:Scheme-Natural-Reserve.jpg|Lookout Natural Reserve View
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)
I consider that it is not likely to change in the close future, because urban developments and big landscape changes take more time than a few years. If it changes will be on very small areas and will not have a large effect on the overall scenery a visitor gets from the lookout.''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''
For the larger time lapse, I believe that there are two possible and opposed cases.

First, (as seen on Future-1 image), the plot growth may '''not consider the natural aspects of the National Park''' that surrounds the city, increase the plot density, and transform the area in a ''''divided' landscape''', with a planting design that will follow the plot shape and not take into consideration the existing natural planting. Eventually this will be seen from the lookout as a scenery that is diverse from the National Park area. Also, this divided landscape may bring ecological problems due to lack of ecological connectivity between areas.

Second, on an opposed case (as seen on Future-2 image, the plot growth could take into consideration the natural existing areas, include them on the plot development and arrange larger size plots, resulting in a '''less divided landscape''', that allows the existing natural plantings to remain without much changes. This will be seen from the lookout as a landscape that is '''continued from Natural Areas to Urbanized Areas''' (but having increased the city size and population). Also, this could maintain the existing ecological connectivity and the existing native species.

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Future-1.jpg|Possible Future N° 1
Image:Future-2.jpg|Possible Future N° 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-View.jpg|Lookout View Area Map
Image:Scheme-Lakes.jpg|Lookout Lakes View
Image:Map-Lakes.jpg|Lakes Map
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
Aerial images where taken form Google Earth and then modified by the author of this Case Study.
View photos where taken by the author of this Case Study

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-12-01T22:43:13Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Cerro Campanario Lookout - Interaction between City, National Park and Users'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Cerro Campanario Lookout''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''San Carlos de Bariloche''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Resized_GEDC2391.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=-41.075404
|lng=-71.476965
|zoom=12
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

This lookout allows to look at a different variety of city areas. It located on the top of "Cerro Campanario" (1050 m AMSL) that stands 200 meters above the city.
The sight is interesting in two main ways:
First, from the lookout you can see different areas of '''the city''' and you can see the surrounding '''National Park''' with its mountains, lakes and forests.
Second, the location and main aspect of any lookout should be a place designed by a Landscape Architect: Both '''WHAT''' you look and '''HOW''' you look at a scene are as important as '''WHERE''' you look at it.

* ''Why did you select it?''
I believe that seeing a part of a city at the same time that you see a natural landscape should be well planned view. How this city designs its plot planting design and how this urban plot interacts with the natural landscape, will bring a significant change in what the viewer sees, and how "beautiful" will consider the scene.
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
I believe that user's perception may be a key feature in understanding the difference and interaction between city and natural reserve.

* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''
It slightly related to my life. The Case Study is located in my hometown.

== Author's perspective ==
I am related as a Landscape Architect, because I think lookout points and National Parks are both interesting cases of study and design.
I had the chance to study the main features of this Nahuel Huapi National Park, and different city areas on my Degree Thesis Project.

Taking into consideration that natural and anthropic planting may diverse in the overall order and native species selection.
-Could any effect of anthropic planting and non-native species selection change the "natural perception" of a landscape?
-How much can a natural landscape area could be changed before it is no longer perceived as "natural"?

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
San Carlos de Bariloche is located inside the area of Nahuel Huapi National Park, though the city is not consider as part of it.
City's Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_carlos_de_bariloche
National Park Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuel_Huapi_National_Park
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== Analytical drawings ==
''Schemes and maps that explain the user's view'
* ''Plot Density vs National Park and Natural Reserves''
* ''As it is shown in the maps and schemes, there's a fine line between the two areas. The low plot density may show a more evident planting design and therefore, can appear to be different from a "natural landscape". The "Really Low Density" may appear to be harder to differentiate from both, a Natural and a Low Plot Density''
* ''(More explaining maps and schemes below)''

<gallery caption="Area Mapping " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-Plot-Density.jpg|Plot Density Map
Image:Scheme-Plot-Density.jpg|Lookout Plot Density View
Image:Map-Natural-Reserve.jpg|National Park area and Natural Reserves
Image:Scheme-Natural-Reserve.jpg|Lookout Natural Reserve View
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)
I consider that it is not likely to change in the close future, because urban developments and big landscape changes take more time than a few years. If it changes will be on very small areas and will not have a large effect on the overall scenery a visitor gets from the lookout.''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''
For the larger time lapse, I believe that there are two possible and opposed developments. First, (as seen on Future-1 image), the plot density growth may n'''ot consider the natural aspects of the National Park''' that surrounds the city, and transform the area in a ''''divided' landscape''', with a planting design that will follow the plot shape and not take into consideration the existing natural planting. Eventually this will be seen from the lookout as a scenery that is diverse from the National Park area

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Future-1.jpg|Possible Future N° 1
Image:Future-2.jpg|Possible Future N° 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-View.jpg|Lookout View Area Map
Image:Scheme-Lakes.jpg|Lookout Lakes View
Image:Map-Lakes.jpg|Lakes Map
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
Aerial images where taken form Google Earth and then modified by the author of this Case Study.
View photos where taken by the author of this Case Study

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Future-2.jpg

2013-12-01T22:33:20Z

Ssancheznapal: Campanario Lookout's possible future 2.

Campanario Lookout's possible future 2.

File:Future-1.jpg

2013-12-01T22:32:10Z

Ssancheznapal: Campanario Lookout's possible future 1.

Campanario Lookout's possible future 1.

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-11-19T18:55:49Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Cerro Campanario Lookout - Interaction between City, National Park and Users'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Cerro Campanario Lookout''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''San Carlos de Bariloche''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Resized_GEDC2391.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=-41.075404
|lng=-71.476965
|zoom=12
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

This lookout allows to look at a different variety of city areas. It located on the top of "Cerro Campanario" (1050 m AMSL) that stands 200 meters above the city.
The sight is interesting in two main ways:
First, from the lookout you can see different areas of '''the city''' and you can see the surrounding '''National Park''' with its mountains, lakes and forests.
Second, the location and main aspect of any lookout should be a place designed by a Landscape Architect: Both '''WHAT''' you look and '''HOW''' you look at a scene are as important as '''WHERE''' you look at it.

* ''Why did you select it?''
I believe that seeing a part of a city at the same time that you see a natural landscape should be well planned view. How this city designs its plot planting design and how this urban plot interacts with the natural landscape, will bring a significant change in what the viewer sees, and how "beautiful" will consider the scene.
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
I believe that user's perception may be a key feature in understanding the difference and interaction between city and natural reserve.

* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''
It slightly related to my life. The Case Study is located in my hometown.

== Author's perspective ==
I am related as a Landscape Architect, because I think lookout points and National Parks are both interesting cases of study and design.
I had the chance to study the main features of this Nahuel Huapi National Park, and different city areas on my Degree Thesis Project.

Taking into consideration that natural and anthropic planting may diverse in the overall order and native species selection.
-Could any effect of anthropic planting and non-native species selection change the "natural perception" of a landscape?
-How much can a natural landscape area could be changed before it is no longer perceived as "natural"?

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
San Carlos de Bariloche is located inside the area of Nahuel Huapi National Park, though the city is not consider as part of it.
City's Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_carlos_de_bariloche
National Park Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuel_Huapi_National_Park
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== Analytical drawings ==
''Schemes and maps that explain the user's view from the''
* ''Plot Density vs National Park and Natural Reserves''
* ''As it is shown in the maps and schemes, there's a fine line between the two areas. The low plot density may show a more evident planting design and therefore, can appear to be different from a "natural landscape". The "Really Low Density" may appear to be harder to differentiate from both, a Natural and a Low Plot Density''
* ''(More explaining maps and schemes below)''

<gallery caption="Area Mapping " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-Plot-Density.jpg|Plot Density Map
Image:Scheme-Plot-Density.jpg|Lookout Plot Density View
Image:Map-Natural-Reserve.jpg|National Park area and Natural Reserves
Image:Scheme-Natural-Reserve.jpg|Lookout Natural Reserve View
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-View.jpg|Lookout View Area Map
Image:Scheme-Lakes.jpg|Lookout Lakes View
Image:Map-Lakes.jpg|Lakes Map
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
Aerial images where taken form Google Earth and then modified by the author of this Case Study.
View photos where taken by the author of this Case Study

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-11-18T20:05:32Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Cerro Campanario Lookout - Interaction between City, National Park and Users'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Cerro Campanario Lookout''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''San Carlos de Bariloche''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Resized_GEDC2391.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=-41.075404
|lng=-71.476965
|zoom=12
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

This lookout allows to look at a different variety of city areas. It located on the top of "Cerro Campanario" (1050 m AMSL) that stands 200 meters above the city.
The sight is interesting in two main ways:
First, from the lookout you can see different areas of '''the city''' and you can see the surrounding '''National Park''' with its mountains, lakes and forests.
Second, the location and main aspect of any lookout should be a place designed by a Landscape Architect: Both '''WHAT''' you look and '''HOW''' you look at a scene are as important as '''WHERE''' you look at it.

* ''Why did you select it?''
I believe that seeing a part of a city at the same time that you see a natural landscape should be well planned view. How this city designs its plot planting design and how this urban plot interacts with the natural landscape, will bring a significant change in what the viewer sees, and how "beautiful" will consider the scene.
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
I believe that user's perception may be a key feature in understanding the difference and interaction between city and natural reserve.

* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''
It slightly related to my life. The Case Study is located in my birthtown.

== Author's perspective ==
I am related as a Landscape Architect, because I think lookout points and National Parks are both interesting cases of study and design.
I had the chance to study the main features of this Nahuel Huapi National Park, and different city areas on my Degree Thesis Project.

Taking into consideration that natural and anthropic planting may diverse in the overall order and native species selection.
-Could any effect of anthropic planting and non-native species selection change the "natural perception" of a landscape?
-How much can a natural landscape area could be changed before it is no longer perceived as "natural"?

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
San Carlos de Bariloche is located inside the area of Nahuel Huapi National Park, though the city is not consider as part of it.
City's Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_carlos_de_bariloche
National Park Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuel_Huapi_National_Park
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== Analytical drawings ==
''Schemes and maps that explain the user's view from the''
* ''Plot Density vs National Park and Natural Reserves''
* ''As it is shown in the maps and schemes, there's a fine line between the two areas. The low plot density may show a more evident planting design and therefore, can appear to be different from a "natural landscape". The "Really Low Density" may appear to be harder to differentiate from both, a Natural and a Low Plot Density''
* ''(More explaining maps and schemes below)''

<gallery caption="Area Mapping " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-Plot-Density.jpg|Plot Density Map
Image:Scheme-Plot-Density.jpg|Lookout Plot Density View
Image:Map-Natural-Reserve.jpg|National Park area and Natural Reserves
Image:Scheme-Natural-Reserve.jpg|Lookout Natural Reserve View
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Map-View.jpg|Lookout View Area Map
Image:Scheme-Lakes.jpg|Lookout Lakes View
Image:Map-Lakes.jpg|Lakes Map
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
Aerial images where taken form Google Earth and then modified by the author of this Case Study.
View photos where taken by the author of this Case Study

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Scheme-Plot-Density.jpg

2013-11-18T19:50:22Z

Ssancheznapal: Lookout Plot Density

Lookout Plot Density

File:Scheme-Natural-Reserve.jpg

2013-11-18T19:49:45Z

Ssancheznapal: Lookout Scheme Reserve

Lookout Scheme Reserve

File:Scheme-Lakes.jpg

2013-11-18T19:48:58Z

Ssancheznapal: Lookout Lake Scheme

Lookout Lake Scheme

File:Map-Lakes.jpg

2013-11-18T19:44:43Z

Ssancheznapal: Area Lakes

Area Lakes

File:Map-Natural-Reserve.jpg

2013-11-18T19:42:51Z

Ssancheznapal: Area's Natural Reserve

Area's Natural Reserve

File:Map-Plot-Density.jpg

2013-11-18T19:41:11Z

Ssancheznapal: Area Plot Density

Area Plot Density

File:Map-View.jpg

2013-11-18T19:32:32Z

Ssancheznapal: Overall Lookout View

Overall Lookout View

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-11-18T15:57:34Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Resized GEDC2391.jpg

2013-11-18T15:48:56Z

Ssancheznapal: North-West lookout view for Cerro Campanario, Bariloche, Argentina.

North-West lookout view for Cerro Campanario, Bariloche, Argentina.

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 20 - Case Study A

2013-11-18T15:46:17Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_20|working group 20]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Cerro Campanario Lookout''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''San Carlos de Bariloche''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=71.295556
|lng=-156.766389
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

This lookout allows to look at a different variety of city areas. It located on the top of "Cerro Campanario" (1050 m AMSL) that stands 200 meters above the city.
The sight is interesting in two main ways:
First, from the lookout you can see different areas of '''the city''' and you can see the surrounding '''National Park''' with its mountains, lakes and forests.
Second, the location and main aspect of any lookout should be a place designed by a Landscape Architect: Both '''WHAT''' you look and '''HOW''' you look at a scene are as important as '''WHERE''' you look at it.

* ''Why did you select it?''
I believe that seeing a part of a city at the same time that you see a natural landscape should be well planned view. How this city designs its plot planting design and how this urban plot interacts with the natural landscape, will bring a significant change in what the viewer sees, and how "beautiful" will consider the scene.
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''

* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''
It slightly related to my life. The Case Study is located in my birthtown.
I am also related as a Landscape Architect, because I think lookout points and National Parks are both interesting cases of study and design.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Belgrano R Train Station

2012-01-10T13:44:34Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to overview of [[Everyday_Landscapes_Seminar_Case_Study_List|Case Study List]]

'''"Belgrano R" Train Station, Buenos Aires, Argentina'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Belgrano R Train Station''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Buenos Aires''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:BelgranoR_1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="-34.567857" lon="-58.46279" zoom="16" width="300" height="250">
-34.567804, -58.462619, Belgrano R Train Station
Belgrano R Train Station
</googlemap>
|}

==Short Introduction to the Area of Study==

This case study is located in a residential area of Buenos Aires city.

On work days, a huge amount of people use the station: people who live in the neighbourhood and use the train line to go work downtown and people who live in the suburbs and work in commercial areas near the train station.

The train station and the railway, which run east-westwards, divide the urban plot and neighbourhood into two different areas: South side, mainly formed by maximum three-floor houses inhabited and North side, mainly formed by buildings up to 15 floors.

The station is only used as a circulation area and its vacant spaces’ potential are not exploited. It is also surrounded by public parks from which it has small connection with.

It is important for me because I live one block away, walk by the station every day and use the train station every other day.

== Exercise 1: Sketching the Landscape ==

'''Time frame: October 25 - November 15, 2011'''

'''''Student activities:'''''
* Creation of analytical drawings and sketches
* Presentation of results

''Please upload a selection of your drawings/sketches/mental maps and add them to the image gallery''

=== Sketches and Drawings ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 1.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 2.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 3.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 4.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Color 1.jpg|Coloured Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Color 2.jpg|Coloured Sketch
Image:Belgrano R-Sketch 2.jpg|Sketch analysis. Shows where train station users stand and the paths they use.
</gallery>

== Exercise 2: Landscape Layers ==

'''Time frame: November 15 - 29, 2011'''
*time based changes and 'landscape biography', and/or:
* topography, open spaces, built, green, traffic and water structures on different layers. *Definition of zones with coherent character
*Description of this character.

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:1-Belgrano R 1876.jpg|First historical layer: The railway and station is created.
Image:2-Belgrano R 1880-1910.jpg|Second historical layer: The neighbourhood starts to grow as a high class area.
Image:3-Belgrano R 1920-1960.jpg|Third historical layer: The growing continues with a new type consisted by a mid-class area.
Image:4-Belgrano R 1960-Present.jpg|Fourth historical layer: In the modern times the mid class area continues to grow, changing houses for buildings. The high class area continues very much the same, with minor changes.
Image:5-Belgrano R Influence.jpg|Station influence area and other nearby stations. This shows the nearby stations and the area in which the Belgrano R Train Station has influence over the general users, assuming that people will use the station is near to their house/workplace and the one they can get the easiest way.
Image:6-Belgrano R Parks.jpg|Nearby parks and its features. It considerate what people can use in the parks.
Image:7-Belgrano R Population.jpg|Neighbourhood's population density. Shows two different areas, as shown in the historical layers: The north side of the railway, formed by high buildings (10 to 20 floors high) which have many people living and therefore increasing the population density (shown as a red area). The south side formed by old big houses with large lots, which decrease the density (shown as a white area)
Image:9-Belgrano R General Zoom.jpg|First Station zoom: General disposition of the different areas that form the train station.

</gallery>

''Please publish your findings here''

== Exercise 3: Behaviour Patterns ==

'''Time frame: December 6 - 20, 2011'''
* How do people behave in this area? How do they use the space? What is important for them?
* Observation of study area, interviews with local people and mapping of use patterns.
* Preparation of short presentation

''Please publish your findings here''
<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:11-Belgrano R Pedestrian Behaviour.jpg|Pedestrian behaviour: Train station's users path, neighbourhood's paths, places of interest where people goes, places where people usually has to stop (level crossing places, bus stops, train platform, traffic light corners)
Image:10-Belgrano R Behaviour Zoom.jpg|Station zoom: Pedestrian behaviour in the station. Paths that users take to get in or out of the station.
Image:12-Belgrano R Traffic Behaviour.jpg|Traffic behaviour in the area: Main used streets. The railway level crossing streets available are the only ones that are marked, the others do not work as level crossing for cars.
</gallery>

== Exercise 4: Communication Concepts ==

'''Time frame: December 19, 2011 - January 17, 2012'''
* Based on the different landscape assessment approaches students will develop a communication concept for their area of study
* Which measures would be necessary for enhancing the awareness for the area?
* Students are free to choose their method.

-Sidewalk art gallery-
The Belgrano R Train Station behaviour analysis shows that people of the neighbourhood mainly uses the area to go from their homes, working places or other transportation systems, to the station and the way back. So, the neighbourhood’s streets are used mainly to get to the station and out of it.
Knowing this, the project looks for a way to increase awareness of the path people uses, and to make these different paths easy to identify.
To get this showed, the proposal is to create different art galleries on the sidewalks. Each path identified on the behaviour analysis will have different art styles, such as paintings, photography, sculptures, videos and graffities.
A walking-by art gallery will give people something to look at as they get to the station every day and will increase the awareness of the different paths they use and give the chance to follow another path, and so to get to see some other art styles.

Each path will have a unique design so that is easy to identify from the others: One colour each and different stands for the art with different shapes.

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:Belgrano R Train Station 1.jpg|Overall project's paths disposition.
Image:Belgrano R Train Station 2.jpg|Different paths' art stands and characteristics.
Image:Belgrano R Train Station 3.jpg|Example images.
</gallery>

''Please publish your findings here''

== Image Gallery ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Case Study]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Working Group]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Transportation Landscapes]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Belgrano R Train Station 3.jpg

2012-01-10T13:42:11Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Belgrano R Train Station 2.jpg

2012-01-10T13:41:52Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:Belgrano R Train Station 1.jpg

2012-01-10T13:40:34Z

Ssancheznapal:

Belgrano R Train Station

2011-12-10T22:31:48Z

Ssancheznapal:

---> back to overview of [[Everyday_Landscapes_Seminar_Case_Study_List|Case Study List]]

'''"Belgrano R" Train Station, Buenos Aires, Argentina'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Belgrano R Train Station''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Buenos Aires''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Argentina''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sebastian Sanchez Napal''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:BelgranoR_1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="-34.567857" lon="-58.46279" zoom="16" width="300" height="250">
-34.567804, -58.462619, Belgrano R Train Station
Belgrano R Train Station
</googlemap>
|}

==Short Introduction to the Area of Study==

This case study is located in a residential area of Buenos Aires city.

On work days, a huge amount of people use the station: people who live in the neighbourhood and use the train line to go work downtown and people who live in the suburbs and work in commercial areas near the train station.

The train station and the railway, which run east-westwards, divide the urban plot and neighbourhood into two different areas: South side, mainly formed by maximum three-floor houses inhabited and North side, mainly formed by buildings up to 15 floors.

The station is only used as a circulation area and its vacant spaces’ potential are not exploited. It is also surrounded by public parks from which it has small connection with.

It is important for me because I live one block away, walk by the station every day and use the train station every other day.

== Exercise 1: Sketching the Landscape ==

'''Time frame: October 25 - November 15, 2011'''

'''''Student activities:'''''
* Creation of analytical drawings and sketches
* Presentation of results

''Please upload a selection of your drawings/sketches/mental maps and add them to the image gallery''

=== Sketches and Drawings ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 1.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 2.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 3.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Pencil 4.jpg|Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Color 1.jpg|Coloured Sketch
Image:Belgrano R -Color 2.jpg|Coloured Sketch
Image:Belgrano R-Sketch 2.jpg|Sketch analysis. Shows where train station users stand and the paths they use.
</gallery>

== Exercise 2: Landscape Layers ==

'''Time frame: November 15 - 29, 2011'''
*time based changes and 'landscape biography', and/or:
* topography, open spaces, built, green, traffic and water structures on different layers. *Definition of zones with coherent character
*Description of this character.

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:1-Belgrano R 1876.jpg|First historical layer: The railway and station is created.
Image:2-Belgrano R 1880-1910.jpg|Second historical layer: The neighbourhood starts to grow as a high class area.
Image:3-Belgrano R 1920-1960.jpg|Third historical layer: The growing continues with a new type consisted by a mid-class area.
Image:4-Belgrano R 1960-Present.jpg|Fourth historical layer: In the modern times the mid class area continues to grow, changing houses for buildings. The high class area continues very much the same, with minor changes.
Image:5-Belgrano R Influence.jpg|Station influence area and other nearby stations. This shows the nearby stations and the area in which the Belgrano R Train Station has influence over the general users, assuming that people will use the station is near to their house/workplace and the one they can get the easiest way.
Image:6-Belgrano R Parks.jpg|Nearby parks and its features. It considerate what people can use in the parks.
Image:7-Belgrano R Population.jpg|Neighbourhood's population density. Shows two different areas, as shown in the historical layers: The north side of the railway, formed by high buildings (10 to 20 floors high) which have many people living and therefore increasing the population density (shown as a red area). The south side formed by old big houses with large lots, which decrease the density (shown as a white area)
Image:9-Belgrano R General Zoom.jpg|First Station zoom: General disposition of the different areas that form the train station.

</gallery>

''Please publish your findings here''

== Exercise 3: Behaviour Patterns ==

'''Time frame: December 6 - 20, 2011'''
* How do people behave in this area? How do they use the space? What is important for them?
* Observation of study area, interviews with local people and mapping of use patterns.
* Preparation of short presentation

''Please publish your findings here''
<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:11-Belgrano R Pedestrian Behaviour.jpg|Pedestrian behaviour: Train station's users path, neighbourhood's paths, places of interest where people goes, places where people usually has to stop (level crossing places, bus stops, train platform, traffic light corners)
Image:10-Belgrano R Behaviour Zoom.jpg|Station zoom: Pedestrian behaviour in the station. Paths that users take to get in or out of the station.
Image:12-Belgrano R Traffic Behaviour.jpg|Traffic behaviour in the area: Main used streets. The railway level crossing streets available are the only ones that are marked, the others do not work as level crossing for cars.
</gallery>

== Exercise 4: Communication Concepts ==

'''Time frame: December 19, 2011 - January 17, 2012'''
* Based on the different landscape assessment approaches students will develop a communication concept for their area of study
* Which measures would be necessary for enhancing the awareness for the area?
* Students are free to choose their method.

''Please publish your findings here''

== Image Gallery ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimagename.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Case Study]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Working Group]]
[[Category:Everyday Landscapes Transportation Landscapes]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Belgrano R Train Station

2011-12-10T21:11:12Z

Ssancheznapal:

Belgrano R Train Station

2011-12-10T21:09:27Z

Ssancheznapal:

Belgrano R Train Station

2011-12-10T21:08:47Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:12-Belgrano R Traffic Behaviour.jpg

2011-12-10T21:00:23Z

Ssancheznapal:

File:11-Belgrano R Pedestrian Behaviour.jpg

2011-12-10T20:58:01Z

Ssancheznapal:

Talk:Overpass Landscapes

2011-12-09T19:35:56Z

Ssancheznapal:

Natalia & Dragana: I like the layers that you made for the sketches, showing different information with the same drawings. I also like the way historical layers are shown and the information you've choosen to show on the other layers.

Talk:Passing Landscape in Bornova

2011-12-09T19:35:41Z

Ssancheznapal:

Isin:
The place you've choosen seems to be very crowded.
The sketches you did help explain how people move on the area.
It would be excellent if you could find out how many people pass by that "transportation knot" and where do they come from (referenced in the city layers you've made)!
-Sebastian SN (Belgrano R Train Station)

Talk:Overpass Landscapes

2011-12-09T19:34:23Z

Ssancheznapal: New page: Natalia & Dragana: I like the layers that you made for the sketches, showing different information with the same drawings. I also like the way historical layers are shown and the informati...

Talk:Underground Landscapes

2011-12-09T19:29:16Z

Ssancheznapal:

Milkana & Natalia:
I like the fact that both use your own style to show the same places but from different views and taking into consideration different aspects.- Sebastian SN (Blegrano R Station)

Talk:Passing Landscape in Bornova

2011-12-08T22:52:41Z

Ssancheznapal:

Isin:
The place you choosed seems to be very crowded.
The sketches you did help explain how people move on the area.
It would be excellent if you could find out how many people pass by that "transportation knot" and where do they come from (referenced in the city layers you've made)!
-Sebastian SN (Belgrano R Train Station)

Talk:Passing Landscape in Bornova

2011-12-08T22:50:35Z

Ssancheznapal: New page: Isin: The place you choosed seems to be very crowded. The sketches you did help explain how people move on the area. It would be excellent if you could find out how many people pass by t...