Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 2 - Case Study A

2014-02-27T10:00:11Z

Rinijames11: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''From a 'BROWNFIELD' to a "GREENFIELD"

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope ''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Rini James''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:rj.jpg|300px]]
|- [[Media:Example.ogg]]
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=240
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''
WHY?: This case drew my interest as it stands as a testimony to demonstrate the ability of nature to self-transform or simply adapt!

EXEMPLARY BECAUSE: This site was used as a landfill till the recent past.Leftover building waste like bricks, stones, sand, etc. from construction sites, demolition projects etc. from neighboring regions were emptied into this site which is located off the Autobahn A73 towards, Forchheim.With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site.Eventually the state stepped in and took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a 'BIOTOPE' (specifically an amphibian reserve).A couple of existing water ponds additionally strengthen the prospects of the project. I find this metamorphosis of a brownfield into a "greenfield" rather fascinating.
Further interesting is the site's topographic transformation.Over time, the terrain has self modelled itself from a flat plane to an undulated or contoured profile.This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

RELATES TO ME: I am involved in the planning of this revitalization project which I believe, is an understanding of natural dynamics more closely and an investigation into the level of human intervention required in retaining a natural space in order to create a "naturalscape", while seeking sustainable outcomes.

== Author's perspective ==
As an architect, one cannot overlook the urban context of any project. This project particularly, demands a sound understanding of the local landscape conditions and requirements along with a clear analysis of the physical aspects of the urban fabric. I hence intend to investigate the case in terms of landscape conditions and urban influences and their interdependencies.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
The site of "Project Biotope" is located in Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most prominent recognized public green space in the city is the StadtPark (City park),Forchheim. It also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Main-Danube canal and has a fertile and arable land.
This site however is not distinctly known for its vegetation type or its natural setting. However, its extrusive location; along autobahn A73 makes it inevitable to let it go unnoticed. Parts of the land are privately owned while most part yet belongs to the state. The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘''Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula''’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘''Molinia caerulea''’ and ‘''Juncus effusus''’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘''Verbascum thapsus''’ and a couple of other species are now thriving.
The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. Small ponds with little decks and small aquatic creatures like fish and toads enhance the naturalistic setting on site. The self-modulated terrain with little sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizes the experience on site. The sand dunes are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area.
Currently the entire area under discussion can be classified into three distinct parts as illustrated in the image below. The most predominant are the logistics center and the landfill that cast a gory impression along the road. This can be altered by planning the area and its usage.
[[image:So.jpg|none|500x300px|]]
''(a)New plant species thriving in the existing landscape'' ''(b)Photomontage depicting vegetation on site in summer and winter ''

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-6.jpg|Site Analysis
Image:Unbenannt-2.jpg|Change in topography
Image:Unbenannt-3.jpg|Current ownership pattern on site
Image:Unbenannt-8.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1_yr.jpg|In the next '''one year''' the two basic possibilities would be:(a) to breed colloquial amphibian species and (b) to allow people to access the area as a thoroughfare.
Image:2.jpg|In the next '''two years''', the landfill area may be addressed to and treated to make the land vegetative and shift the landfill area to a less prominent zone and provide better visual interest and aesthetics along the highway.
Image:Untitled-4.jpg|In '''Ten years''', the project can develop into an arboretum (on similar lines as the current proposal),encouraging people to learn more closely about flora and fauna around them.
Image:10.jpg|In '''Fifteen Years''',the biotope could turn out to be a reserve of some rare species of amphibians and could add similar groups of fauna into the reserve. The vegetation could be further enriched to form a dense foliage.It could serve as an information and awareness centre as well.
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
This proposal is a sustainable one and is a receptacle for conservation of both flora and fauna. The design proposal aims to make the reserve a public free zone in order to avoid maintenance concerns. Well, I personally feel one way to bring in awareness of nature among people and to sensitize them about its issues is to let them be a part of it. A "controlled" environment for the users will ensure judicious use of any natural assemblage to a certain extent. With innovative planning and design principles, this project has the potential to boost the local economy as well.

"'''''Image of Nature'''''" need not be an existing utopia.It can however be where potentials and possibilities of tomorrow lie.This particular case in its current state is a perfect image of nature in its unkempt state!It is in such situations that landscape can be recreated,revived or revitalised.I see this project as one such proposal where there land is put into an alternative yet natural use.It is an opportunity to knit a sanctuary into an existing urban fabric considering dual influences,impacts and consequences.
== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="230px" heights="230x" perrow="4">
Image:The_site_as_seen_from_the_approach_road_(A73).JPG|The site as seen from the approach road A73
Image:The_Logistics_Centre_on_the_site.JPG|The logistics centre adjoining the site (former part of the site)
Image:The_land_fill_part_of_the_site.JPG|Part of the site that is used as a landfill area
Image:Sand_dunes_that_have_formed_over_time.JPG|Sand dunes that have formed overtime undulating the terrain
Image:Water_bodies_on_site.JPG|The caravan far behind is indicative of camping activities on site.
Image:IMG_1286.JPG|The groundcover,shrubs and trees on site
Image:IMG_1291.JPG|Little sand dunes formed overtime
Image:IMG_1292.JPG|While one part of the site looks dry and comes across like an arid area,the other part is rich in green and consists of evergreen vegetation
</gallery>

== References ==
''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:50:50Z

Rinijames11: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:Aligne.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG 1239.JPG|Caravan onsite indicative camping actives
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Site as visible from Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1268.JPG|Landfill area adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1291.JPG|Sand dunes that have formed overtime
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:IMG 1291.JPG

2014-01-28T22:49:44Z

Rinijames11: uploaded a new version of "File:IMG 1291.JPG"

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:48:41Z

Rinijames11: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:Aligne.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG 1239.JPG|Caravan onsite indicative camping actives
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Site as visible from Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1268.JPG|Landfill area adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Site as visible from Autobahn A73
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:IMG 1268.JPG

2014-01-28T22:47:23Z

Rinijames11:

File:IMG 1260.JPG

2014-01-28T22:45:13Z

Rinijames11: uploaded a new version of "File:IMG 1260.JPG"

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:43:05Z

Rinijames11: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:Aligne.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG 1239.JPG|Caravan onsite indicative camping actives
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:IMG 1239.JPG

2014-01-28T22:41:24Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:38:43Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:Aligne.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Aligne.jpg

2014-01-28T22:38:04Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:24:22Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:800px-Untitled-4.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:1223.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|Synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T22:23:22Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:800px-Untitled-4.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Gen.jpg|1223.jpg : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:1223.jpg

2014-01-28T22:20:12Z

Rinijames11: uploaded a new version of "File:1223.jpg"

File:Gen.jpg

2014-01-28T22:16:02Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T21:56:36Z

Rinijames11: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
Image:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg| Transport network connecting the site
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:800px-Untitled-4.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:908289 10202520191941739 2142738320 n.jpg

2014-01-28T21:55:00Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T21:51:48Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:800px-Untitled-4.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|SWOT chart 1 : Overall Planning Strategy
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart 2 : '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 2 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the strategy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T21:45:45Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:800px-Untitled-4.jpg|Cumilative zones on site are replaced with grasslands
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:LANDFILLco.jpg|synthesis drawing 1: Planting Strategy for the landfill areas.
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:800px-Untitled-4.jpg

2014-01-28T21:43:58Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T21:02:11Z

Rinijames11: /* References */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:viz.jpg|projective drawing: Landfill replaced by grassland.
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

NOTE : This Project is undocumented.The referred sources are as acknowledged below.
The photomontages are a compilation of bits of images.

''https://maps.google.de/maps?q=St2244,+Forchheim&ie=UTF-8&ei=SGaeUpOuC8eMtAb0yoGYCA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg''

''Büro Czerwonka,Erlangen & open sources for montage image gallery''
''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T20:52:41Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:Tired.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Tired.jpg

2014-01-28T20:51:21Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T20:12:26Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T20:10:27Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="230px" heights="230px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T20:10:09Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T15:35:34Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:Wasser1.jpg|Grassland revived into wetland due to the water retention capacity of the soil in that region. This would aid growth of aquatic plants and amphibians and other aquatic life. Hence serving as a good platform for a closer association with nature and also for recreational use.
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Wasser1.jpg

2014-01-28T15:28:31Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:55:05Z

Rinijames11: /* Summary of the collaborative process */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:54:54Z

Rinijames11: /* Summary of the collaborative process */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.

In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:54:39Z

Rinijames11: /* Summary of the collaborative process */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.
In addition, it was clearly a learning experience of not only the subject but also communication, analytical abilities, time management and commitment while maintaining a stainless relationship within the group.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:51:43Z

Rinijames11: /* Summary of the collaborative process */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==

Individual analysis of the project proposal and a collective discussion thereafter led to ideas that were acceptable to all. Although, at an individual level certain ideas were felt more staunchly towards, they were implemented subtly in the strategy.
The varying backgrounds of the three authors i.e. Architecture, Agriculture and Landscape architecture gave good opportunity to understand the same case in different perspectives.
It was rather interesting to see how the focus area or interests vary influenced by one’s professional background. This collaborative process was also an opportunity to see how all the different perspectives can be put together to arrive at a satisfying solution that looks solitary.
In our project, the strategy remained simple. The site was zoned keeping in mind ‘Planting Design’ concepts while considering local and urban issues. Projectives were worked out collectively for the same.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:30:37Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.
Also, the well vegetated part of the site was kept undisturbed and only the chunk that had immense potential but deteriorated was considered (as illustrated in the drawings).

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T14:05:39Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

Design interventions on the other hand, are kept minimal to retain the innate characteristics of the site setting. Basic physical additions to establish a public connect to the site is carried out and supplementary local plant species that can be supported on site are added along with the existing.

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T13:50:17Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==

The Planting scheme and design proposal for the project are analyzed in the form of SWOT charts and also illustrations. The proposal is along the lines of a ‘Biotope’, with additional zoning to create a diverse habitat within the same setting. The site conditions prove conducive to support a Biotope that is versatile in its capacity.

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T10:41:40Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:Swot2.jpg|SWOT chart of the new '''Planting Strategy''' and planning proposed : Roadside plantation and Woodlands.
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Swot2.jpg

2014-01-28T10:36:46Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T10:00:41Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current conditions of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign. '''Concept''' : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T09:57:30Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Strater_dg1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current condition of different areas in the chosen zone and also the stratergy used to redesign.Concept : The walk through the woodlands culminate into the wetland, changing the habitat type and breaking the monotony.The reason to convert the area onto woodlands is because the surrounding patches have a dense foliage of trees. The pattern is continued to maintain uniformity and make the area rich in green.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Strater dg1.jpg

2014-01-28T09:57:13Z

Rinijames11:

File:Dg 1.jpg

2014-01-28T09:45:41Z

Rinijames11: uploaded a new version of "File:Dg 1.jpg"

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T09:34:54Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Dg_1.jpg|Synthesis drawing 4 : Representing the current condition of different areas in the chosen zone and the stratergy used to redesign.
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T09:31:43Z

Rinijames11: /* Design Synthesis */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:Dg_1.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Dg 1.jpg

2014-01-28T09:31:18Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-28T08:55:53Z

Rinijames11:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:Woodland.jpg|The existing brownfield area converted into woodlands. Public accessibility into all the proposed zones are provided to establish an interactive platform between people and nature.
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Woodland.jpg

2014-01-28T08:44:08Z

Rinijames11:

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-27T22:48:48Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-27T22:48:26Z

Rinijames11: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-24T00:09:13Z

Rinijames11: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-24T00:08:42Z

Rinijames11: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic shifts
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 2

2014-01-24T00:06:55Z

Rinijames11: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_2|working group 2]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Project Biotope''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Forchheim''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Abdullah Arafa,Evelina Knyzelyte,Rini James ''
|-
| colspan="24.JPG" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:24.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=49.69009
|lng=11.05685
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==

LOCATION : The site of "Project Biotope" is located along the autobahn A73 towards Forchheim, Germany. Apart from the many farms and fields, the most predominant public green space in the city of Forchheim is the ''StadtPark'' (City park). The city also consists of considerable amount of forest cover. Overall, Forchheim is located in in the lower terrace of the Rhine valley and has a fertile and arable land.

SITE HISTORY : This site served as a landfill for construction debris like bricks,stones,sand,etc from local and neighbouring construction and demolition sites. With excessive dumping the land was close to exploited and needed supervision and this intentness created a demand among private investors which led to encroachment and soon a logistics centre was set up in one part of the site. Eventually, the state took measures to guard a part of the site which is yet unexploited and took an initiative to conserve this area by transforming it into a '''''BIOTOPE''''' (specifically an amphibian reserve).The existing conditions in the undisturbed parts of the site are extremely conducive to transform this less prominent area into a potential 'lung space' for the region.

BIOGEOGRAPHY : The undisturbed parts of the site is rich in vegetation and the ever changing local conditions show new plant species shooting up in various parts of the site. While the most dominant species of trees on site are ‘Acer cappadocicum’ ‘Betula pendula’ ‘Pinus Strobus’ ‘Betula Pendula’ and the ground cover is predominantly ‘Molinia caerulea’ and ‘Juncus effusus’ , exactly one or two shoots of ‘Verbascum thapsus’ and a couple of other species are seen thriving.
The site terrain which was relatively flat has self-modulated with time, forming sand dunes and deep trenches dramatizing the experience on site. The sandunes, are believed to be a result of dispersal of sand by wind from the landfill part of the site.Existing water bodies are also home to some aquatic creatures like fish and toads.

DYNAMICS : The site is sometimes used by private owners for camping or rented out for campers. The area encroached to be used as landfill has minimized in size after the proposal to revitalize the area. This acreage is not an identified piece of land but it is prominently located and possesses innate abilities to transform itself into a dignified landscape.

OVERALL : Favourable existing site conditions (soil/vegetation) and the site setting shows optimism in the project proposal. This could establish a cultural connect which is currently non existent in the site vicinity.

<gallery caption=" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
Image:Unbenannt-1A-Wiederhergestellt.jpg|Illustration 1 :Site Vicinity
Image:Unbenannt-1.jpg |Illustration 2 : View of different parts of the site
Image:Untitled-AAA.jpg|Illustration 3 : Site Details
</gallery>

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

- To '''revive and revitalize''' the the site area and give it a '''new identity'''.

- To '''analyse''' the scope of the site and project proposal while keeping in mind the '''usage pattern''' and possibilities.

- Understanding the '''urban context''' and its influence on the project at a ''micro and macro level'' and vice-versa.

- Explore various '''typologies of 'Biotopes'''' in the existing site condition and create a mixed habitat.

- To explore new plant species along with the already existing foliage on site.

- To establish a '''cultural context''' and create a '''landmark''' in the region.

- To use the site as an '''interactive domain''' to connect nature and people.

- To create an '''educative and recreational landscape''' while keeping '''interventions minimal'''.

- To add a '''green corridor''' along the Autobahn and strengthen the character of the site and region overall.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="250px" heights="250px" perrow="4">

Image:Unbenannt-1B.jpg|Natural landscape in the region and visual axis into the site
Image:1Areal.jpg|Existing pedestrian access into the site
Image:Areal1.jpg|Classification of different physical conditions existing on site
Image:1Topo.jpg|Topographic analysis
Image:Vegeta.jpg| Prevalent vegetation
Image:Site cond.jpg| Climate and Physical influences
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
Image:strategy.jpg| Zoning indicating planting strategy
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
Image:IMG_1243.JPG|Logistics centre adjoining the site
Image:IMG_1260.JPG|Image showing traffic and visibility aspects on Autobahn A73
Image:IMG_1284.JPG|Ares on site with good vegetation.The image is also indicative of change in physical differences in terms of topography,ground cover,foliage,etc.This creates a dual landscape effect coupled in the same acreage.
Image:IMG_1295.JPG|Sharp topographic changes
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories