Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-02-06T14:29:40Z

Minolpirol:

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Gleisdreieck''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Christian Polzin''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2011/12''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City-State of Berlin''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Uebersicht_gleisdreieck.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg|none|frame|Process biography]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

=== Author's thoughts on this project / Possible improvement of this process example ===

Despite the fact of close involvement of the public peculiar during the preparatory stage and the planning phase, as you can see in the process biography scheme above, it's evident that the tools of participation are cooling down reaching the implementation phase. Of course there are some meetings with representitives of the residents and important responsible persons during that phase, but the level of participatory is less than cooperation on a level playing field.
Residents can influence the decision-making on smaller parts of the park like design and equipment of the playgrounds near the residents houses or decisions concerning the allotments, but the "big" decisions are already made by the local administration and the landscape architects without the possibilty for the residents to veto.

One important goal of this competition with this intensive public participation is the creation of an local identity. Residents should get aware and also develope kind of sense of responsibilty for this area that was noman's land over decades.

So one big question raises: How can this goal be successfully achieved, when the public isn't involved in big and important decisions?

In this case I think the local administration should have create some more participation tools during the planning phase and more close involvement in big decisions that would just prevent some general opinion not to be really involved. It's also an aspect of sustainability to create a local identity and it should have been the park from and for the residents.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Participation1.jpg|Walks on the area
Image:Participation2.jpg|Information stand
Image:Participation3.jpg|Children with ballon. It says "Let's go to Gleisdreieck Park"
Image:Participation4.jpg|Participation via internet: Online-Dialogue
Image:Participation5.jpg|Workshop (ideas)
Image:Participation6.jpg|Children-Participation
Image:Participation7.jpg|Exhibition of the plans (Step 1)
Image:Participation8.jpg|Workshop (planning)
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===
- Information about the competition on Park Gleisdreieck (german)
--> [http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/aktuell/wettbewerbe/ergebnisse/2006/gleisdreieck/index.shtml]

- Archive: Results of the public participation (german)
--> [http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/aktuell/wettbewerbe/ergebnisse/2006/gleisdreieck/zebralog/discoursemachine.php_view=viewcompiler&id_view=27.html]

- Further information about the status of the new park (german)
--> [http://www.gruen-berlin.de/parks-gaerten/gleisdreieck-park/uebersicht/?L=]

- Blog from local resident club about Gleisdreick Park (german)
--> [http://gleisdreieck-blog.de/]
----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-13T09:21:20Z

Minolpirol: /* References */

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Gleisdreieck''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Christian Polzin''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2011/12''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City-State of Berlin''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Uebersicht_gleisdreieck.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Participation1.jpg|Walks on the area
Image:Participation2.jpg|Information stand
Image:Participation3.jpg|Children with ballon. It says "Let's go to Gleisdreieck Park"
Image:Participation4.jpg|Participation via internet: Online-Dialogue
Image:Participation5.jpg|Workshop (ideas)
Image:Participation6.jpg|Children-Participation
Image:Participation7.jpg|Exhibition of the plans (Step 1)
Image:Participation8.jpg|Workshop (planning)
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===
- Information about the competition on Park Gleisdreieck (german)
--> [http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/aktuell/wettbewerbe/ergebnisse/2006/gleisdreieck/index.shtml]

- Archive: Results of the public participation (german)
--> [http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/aktuell/wettbewerbe/ergebnisse/2006/gleisdreieck/zebralog/discoursemachine.php_view=viewcompiler&id_view=27.html]

- Further information about the status of the new park (german)
--> [http://www.gruen-berlin.de/parks-gaerten/gleisdreieck-park/uebersicht/?L=]

- Blog from local resident club about Gleisdreick Park (german)
--> [http://gleisdreieck-blog.de/]
----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T16:50:41Z

Minolpirol: /* Image Gallery */

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Gleisdreieck''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Christian Polzin''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2011/12''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City-State of Berlin''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Uebersicht_gleisdreieck.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Participation1.jpg|Walks on the area
Image:Participation2.jpg|Information stand
Image:Participation3.jpg|Children with ballon. It says "Let's go to Gleisdreieck Park"
Image:Participation4.jpg|Participation via internet: Online-Dialogue
Image:Participation5.jpg|Workshop (ideas)
Image:Participation6.jpg|Children-Participation
Image:Participation7.jpg|Exhibition of the plans (Step 1)
Image:Participation8.jpg|Workshop (planning)
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T16:49:51Z

Minolpirol: /* Image Gallery */

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Gleisdreieck''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Christian Polzin''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2011/12''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City-State of Berlin''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Uebersicht_gleisdreieck.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Participation1.jpg|Walks on the area
Image:Participation2.jpg|Information stand
Image:Participation3.jpg|Children with ballon. It says "Let's go to Gleisdreieck Park"
Image:Participation4.jpg|Participation via internet: Online-Dialogue
Image:Participation5.jpg|Workshop (ideas)
Image:Participation6.jpg|Children-Participation
Image:Participation7.jpg|Exhibition of the plans (Step 1)
Image:Participation8.jpg|Discussion with landscape-architects and residents
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

File:Participation8.jpg

2010-01-10T16:48:25Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation7.jpg

2010-01-10T16:47:11Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation6.jpg

2010-01-10T16:45:37Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation5.jpg

2010-01-10T16:44:16Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation4.jpg

2010-01-10T16:42:54Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation3.jpg

2010-01-10T16:41:07Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation2.jpg

2010-01-10T16:40:00Z

Minolpirol:

File:Participation1.jpg

2010-01-10T16:38:02Z

Minolpirol:

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T16:22:58Z

Minolpirol:

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''Gleisdreieck''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Christian Polzin''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''currently under construction, planned to be finished 2011/12''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City-State of Berlin''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Uebersicht_gleisdreieck.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

File:Uebersicht gleisdreieck.jpg

2010-01-10T16:16:33Z

Minolpirol:

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T15:55:30Z

Minolpirol: /* Who made the major decisions and when? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

In this case it’s difficult to determine who made the major decisions because there was and still is quite a close collaboration with all people involved that is influencing the decisions.
But considering the fact that the city-state of Berlin initiated the public participation and the local residents can’t decide on their own, it’s assumably the state-city of Berlin that make most of the major decisions.

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T15:41:18Z

Minolpirol: /* Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

There were two weekends in Oct./Nov. 2005 with workshops, walks and information-stands that were quite striking in connection with the campaign “Let’s go to Gleisdreick Park”. That wasn’t really a festivity, but many people were interested and it was like a folk festival.

The final presentation of the plans and the announcement of the winner of the competition took place on a festivity.

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T15:22:00Z

Minolpirol: /* Which stakeholders have been involved? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

The public participation was generally addressed to all residents living in an area accessible on foot in 15 Min around the “Gleisdreieck” that does also include shopkeepers and those, who may not live there but will use the park in the future like employees/workers.

Everybody else who was interested could take part in the workshops etc.

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:54:34Z

Minolpirol: /* Which participation tools have been applied? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- campaign "''Let's go Gleisdreieck Park''" (flyers, balloons, give-aways)

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:50:07Z

Minolpirol: /* Which participation tools have been applied? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

- survey (first tested in “focus groups” to determine problems) sent in representive quantity to local residents

- exploration walks as opportunity to get to know the area

- information stands in the city providing flyers to attract and invite people for the exploration walks and workshops

- workshops (ideas+planning)

- online-dialogue with information and messageboard

- exhibition of the plans from the participating landscape architects

- meeting every two weeks during the implementation with representatives of the local initiatives and the main responsible persons.

==== On which level of participation? ====

Some of the applied tools were informative some co-operative (see above the Process Biography Scheme)

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:44:04Z

Minolpirol: /* When was public participation most intensive? */

''by Christian''

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"|''add project name''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add project location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add your name (optional)''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ===

The area “Gleisdreieck”, altogether about 42ha large, is the last inner-city green space area to develop in Berlin downtown. The competition on the area “Gleisdreieck” was arranged as an experiment and prototype to apply both a high challenging, innovative design and the agreement with the interested public through the close involvement.

=== Author's personal background ===
Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture in 2008 at Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin.
Since Oct. 2009 studying International Master of Landscape Architecture at Nürtingen-Geislingen University.

=== Process Biography Scheme ===

[[Image:Process_biography.jpg]]

=== Who initiated the project and why? ===

The area, located in Berlin downtown, in the south of Potsdamer Place, was railway property over hundred of years until the 80s and became fallow then. After the reunification of East and West Germany, it was considered to use the area for the german state horticultural show, but then it was used as the central logistic place (until 2004) for the construction of the buildings on Potsdamer Place, the biggest construction site in Europe at that time.

After finishing the construction work on Potsdamer Place the area was a place that through the years of inaccessibility became perceived by the population as a no man's land, rank growthed open field or fallow.

The city-state of Berlin (Senate Department for City Development) initiated the open international competition (in 2 steps) to create a park from the history of the place, where the
historical references should be taken up and incorporated into a new utilization concept as well as to amand the social structures in this area.

=== When was public participation most intensive? ===

During the preparatory stage public participation was most intensive to define all the requirements and wishes from the stakeholders/residents for the new park. The main results from the surveys, online-dialogue, workshops etc. were adopted in the international tender.

Second important part was the planning workshop where residents, participating landscape architects and representatives of the city discussed the results of the first plans for revising them for the second step in this competition.

During the implementation phase there’s a meeting every two weeks with representatives of the residents and everybody important involved in building the new park. The residents have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning smaller parts of the park like playgrounds or allotments.

=== Which participation tools have been applied? ===

==== On which level of participation? ====

=== Which stakeholders have been involved? ===

=== Have there been any festivities in order to involve the public? ===

=== Who made the major decisions and when? ===

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

[[#toc|'''Back to top''']]

=== References ===

----

back to [http://draco.hfwu.de/~wikienfk5/index.php/Project_Biographies_Seminar_Public_Participation_09 Project Biography List]

----
[[Category:Project Biography]]
[[Category:Project Biography Working Group]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Berlin]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 1]]
[[Category:Participation Tool 2]]

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:42:29Z

Minolpirol: /* Who initiated the project and why? */

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:34:47Z

Minolpirol: /* Process Biography Scheme */

File:Process biography.jpg

2010-01-10T14:31:53Z

Minolpirol:

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:28:09Z

Minolpirol: /* Author's personal background */

Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Germany

2010-01-10T14:27:04Z

Minolpirol: /* Rationale: Why is this case interesting? */

Project Biographies Seminar Public Participation 09

2009-12-03T19:21:43Z

Minolpirol:

Dear students, please add your name and the title of your project biography to this list. You will then be given a template for completing your documentation.

* [[Project Biography Template]]

----

'''List of Participants' Themes:'''
* Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle) Berlin, Christian
* Your title, your name
* etc...

Project Biographies Seminar Public Participation 09

2009-12-03T19:21:08Z

Minolpirol:

Dear students, please add your name and the title of your project biography to this list. You will then be given a template for completing your documentation.

* [[Project Biography Template]]

----

'''List of Participants' Themes:'''
* Gleisdreieck (Railway Triangle), Berlin (Christian)
* Your title, your name
* etc...

Project Biographies Seminar Public Participation 09

2009-12-03T19:20:51Z

Minolpirol:

Dear students, please add your name and the title of your project biography to this list. You will then be given a template for completing your documentation.

* [[Project Biography Template]]

----

'''List of Participants' Themes:'''
* Gleisdreick (Railway Triangle), Berlin (Christian)
* Your title, your name
* etc...

Literature and Resources Participation

2009-11-03T12:33:19Z

Minolpirol: /* European Landscape Convention */

''THIS SITE IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION!!!''

== Lecture Documents ==
* 20th October 2009: [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=466 Rational Planning and the Communicative Turn]
''An introduction to the evolution of participatory planning by Prof. Diedrich Bruns''

* 27th October 2009: [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=521 Planning according to the European Landscape Convention]
''An Overview by Prof. Diedrich Bruns''

These documents are only available for '''seminar participants'''.

== Topic Map Public Participation ==
[[Image:Topicmap participation.jpeg|thumb|900px|topic map on public participation|none]]

== Planning Theory and Methodology ==

=== First Generation ===

*'''Ian McHarg:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Planning_Theory_and_Methodology/07_06_McHarg_-_Design_with_Nature.pdf Design with Nature] (daniel)

=== Second Generation ===

*'''Sherry R. Arnstein:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/Decision_Making/Arnstein_A_Ladder_of_Citizen_Participation.pdf A Ladder of Citizen Participation]

*'''Patsy Healey:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=506 Planning through debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory]

*'''Patsy Healey:''' [http://www.geography.dur.ac.uk/information/staff/personal/graham/pdf_files/40.pdf Relational concepts of space and place - Issues for planning theory and practice] (umut)

*'''Patsy Healey:''' [http://www.ru.nl/aspx/download.aspx?File=/contents/pages/356205/sem-healeynewinstiutionalism.doc The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning]

*'''Patsy Healey et al.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=507 Making Strategic Spatial Plans - Innovation in Europe]

*'''Horst W. J. Rittel & Melvin M. Webber:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=513 Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning]

=== Third Generation ===

*'''William J. Fear:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=503 Programme Evaluation Theory: The Next Step Toward a Synthesis of Logic Models and Organisational Theory]

*'''Glenn D. Israel:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=510 Using Logic Models for Program Development]

*'''Walter Schönwandt:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=514 Grundriss einer Planungstheorie der "dritten Generation" (GERMAN)]

*'''Walter Schönwandt:''' [http://books.google.de/books?id=FaM-fEqnaaEC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=third+generation+spatial+planning&source=bl&ots=WrNvu_VwBA&sig=HmsZwe80CoLQExu0SInH5GaNdlM&hl=de&ei=hffnSq3kE5eomgPY2cWoCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=third%20generation%20spatial%20planning&f=false Planning in Crisis?] (team hanover - Peter Müller, Ralf Steffen)

=== not yet defined ===

*'''Alan Altshuler:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=497 The Goals of Comprehensive Planning]

*'''David Braybrooke & Charles E. Lindblom:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=499 Zur Strategie der unkoordinierten kleinen Schritte (Original: Disjointed Incrementalism) (GERMAN)]

*'''Susan Fainstein:''' [http://www.columbia.edu/~jwp70/etexts/Can%20We%20Make%20CitiesWeWant.pdf Can We Make Cities We Want] (Umut)

*'''Susan Fainstein:''' [http://www.oamk.fi/luova/hankkeita/entracop/copack/docs/introduction/theories/literature/Feinstein.pdf New Directions in Planning Theory]

*'''Susan Fainstein:''' [http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/people/faculty/fainstein/text/Planning%20Theory%20and%20the%20City%20final.pdf Planning Theory and the City]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=502 A decision-centered view of Environmental Planning]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=498 Planungstheorie oder Theorie des Planens? (GERMAN)]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=501 What is Planning Theory?]

*'''Andreas Faludi et al.:''' [http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:22383/eth-22383-41.pdf#page=4 Introducing Evidence-based planning]

*'''Bent Flyvbjerg:''' [http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/PhronPlan7.1PUBL.pdf Phronetic Planning Research - Theoretical and Methodological Reflections]

*'''Bent Flyvbjerg:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=504 Rationality and Power]

*'''Bent Flyvbjerg:''' [http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/DarksideofplanningPUBL.pdf The Dark Side of Planning (Commentary)] (Kirsten)

*'''John Friedmann:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=505 Two Centuries of Planning Theory: An Overview]

*'''John Friedmann:''' [http://www.planung-neu-denken.de/dokumente/friedmann%20i%7C2007.pdf Planning in the Public Domain: Twenty Years On]

*'''John Friedmann:''' [http://atusocialplanning.ir/PDF/Friedman.pdf Globalization and the emerging culture of planning]

*'''Charles E. Lindblom:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=511 The Science of "Muddling-through"]

*'''Sandra Rosenbloom:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=512 Research Questions on Normative Theories of Planning]

*'''Klaus Selle:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=515 Kooperativ handeln. Versuch, die laufenden Veränderungen auf den Begriff zu bringen (GERMAN)]

*'''Klaus Selle:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=516 Was ist bloß mit der Planung los? (GERMAN)]SusanneRaabe

*'''Klaus Selle:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=517 Phasen oder Stufen? Fortgesetzte Anmerkungen zum Wandel des Planungsverständnisses (GERMAN)]

*'''Klaus Selle:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=518 Blick zurück nach vorn. Versuch über Wandel, Konstanz und Neubeginn (GERMAN)]

*'''Klaus Selle:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=519 Planung lehren? Überlegungen (GERMAN)]

*'''Carl Steinitz:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=520 A Framework for Theory Applicable to the Education of Landscape Architects (and other Environmental Design Professionals)]

== Motivation of Planners ==

=== European Landscape Convention ===

*'''The Council of Europe:''' [http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm The European Landscape Convention]

*'''The Committee of Ministers:''' [http://www.landscapecharacter.org.uk/files/pdfs/ELC-Guidelines-For-Implementation.pdf Recommendations for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, February 2008]

*'''Maguelonne Déjeant-Pons:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Motivation_of_Planners/THE_EUROPEAN_LANDSCAPE_CONVENTION_DEJEANTPONSMaguelonne.pdf The European Landscape Convention]

*'''Maguelonne Déjeant-Pons:''' [http://www.swkk.de/hermes/research/Buchbeitraege/HERMES-Band_3/HERMES_vol3_22Dejeant-Pons.pdf The implementation of the European Landscape Convention]

*'''Michael Jones:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=558 The European Landscape Convention and the Question of Public Participation]

*'''Paul Selman:''' [http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss2/communityessay.selman.pdf What do we mean by sustainable landscape?](Christian)

=== European Water Framework Directive ===

*'''The Council of Europe:''' [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/info/intro_en.htm Introduction to the new EU Water Framework Directive]

*'''The European Commission:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=524 Common Implementation Strategy for the WFD (2000/60/EC) - Public Participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive]

*'''EC:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Motivation_of_Planners/WFD_GUIDANCE_ON_PUBLIC_PARTICIPATION_Active_involvement_Consultation_and_Public_access_to_information.pdf Guidance on Public Participation in relation to the WFD - Active involvement, Consultation, and Public access to information]

*'''EC:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Motivation_of_Planners/WFD_Annex_I_Public_Participation_Techniques.pdf Public Participation Techniques (Annex I)]

=== Territorial Agenda of the European Union ===

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/refereed21.pdf The European Spatial Development Perspective - Shaping the Agenda]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/faludioncohesion.pdf The Third Cohesion Report and the European Spatial Development Perspective]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/dl/1179_631_Web%20Chapter%20Territorial%20Cohesion.pdf The European Model of Society]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/dl/1397_730_Web%20Chapter.pdf European Spatial Research and Planning]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://www.aesop2007napoli.it/full_paper/track2/track2_155.pdf Making Sense of the "Territorial Agenda of the European Union"]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://aesop2005.scix.net/data/papers/att/228.fullTextPrint.pdf Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society]

== Decision Making ==

*'''Amitai Etzioni:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=500 Mixed-scanning: A "Third" Approach to Decision-making]

*'''Susan Fainstein:''' [http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/people/faculty/fainstein/text/Competitiveness,%20Cohesion%20Governance%20IJURR%20final.pdf Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance - Their Implications for Social Justice]

*'''Andreas Faludi:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=502 A decision-centered view of Environmental Planning]

*'''Bent Flyvbjerg:''' [http://vbn.aau.dk/ws/fbspretrieve/2003479/wps3781.pdf Policy and Planning for Large Infrastructure Projects - Problems, Causes, Cures]

*'''Kathleen E. Halvorsen:''' [http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her132/halvorsen.pdf Critical Next Steps in Research on Public Meetings and Environmental Decision Making]

*'''Patsy Healey:''' [http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/en/content/download/975/5957/file Creativity and Urban Governance]

*'''Bert Enserink et al.:''' [http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art24/ Cultural Factors as Co-Determinants of Participation in River Basin Management]

*'''Dr. Sharon Hophmayer-Tokich: '''[http://www.utwente.nl/cstm/reports/Downloads/PP_and_the_WFD.pdf Public Participation under the EU Water Framework Directive – processes and possible outcomes]

*'''Jerzy Jendrosky''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=535 UN ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters - Towards more effective Public Involvement in Monitoring Compliance and Enforcement in Europe]

*'''Jens Newig & Oliver Fritsch:''' [http://www.governat.eu/files/files/dp15_gn8newig_fritsch_epg.pdf Environmental Governance: Participatory, Multi-level – and Effective?] (Barbara)

*''' UN Economic and Social Council:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=533 Progress in the Implementation of the ECE Guidelines on Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making]

*'''Thomas Webler & Seth Tuler:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=549 Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making - Combined Results from 10 Case Studies]

*'''Thomas Webler et al.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=534 Public participation in decision making - A three-step procedure]

== Methods and Tools ==

*'''Noel Boaden et all.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=538 Planning and Participation in Practice: A Study of Public Participation in Structure Planning]

*'''Luuk Boelens:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=539 Beyond the Plan - Towards a New Kind of Planning] (Virpi)

*'''Caron Chess & Branden B. Johnson:''' [http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her132/chessjohnson.pdf Organizational Learning about Public Participation - “Tiggers” and “Eeyores”]

*'''Paul Cloke & Patrick Hanrahan:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=540 Policy and Implementation in Rural Planning]

*'''John M. Cohen & Norman T. Uphoff:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=541 Participation’s Place in Rural Development - Seeking Clarity through Specificity]

*'''Katharine Coit:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=542 Participation, social movements and social change]

*'''Susan Fainstein:''' [http://www.columbia.edu/~jwp70/etexts/FAINSTEIN_Planning%20and%20the%20Just%20City-for%20Columbia%20conf_2006.pdf Planning and the Just City] (Victoria)

*'''Marisa B. Guaraldo M. Rezende:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=543 Decentralised Popular Planning - A Strategy for Change]

*'''HarmoniCOP - Harmonising COllaborative Planning:''' [http://www.harmonicop.uni-osnabrueck.de/_files/_down/HarmoniCOPinception.pdf Public Participation and the European Water Framework Directive - Inception report]

*'''HarmoniCOP - Harmonising COllaborative Planning:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Motivation_of_Planners/HarmoniCOP_Social_Learning_in_River_Basin_Management.pdf Social Learning in River Basin Management]

*'''Corina Höppner et all.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=544 Assessing psycho-social effects of participatory landscape planning] (Markus)

*'''Corina Höppner et all.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=545 Assessing psycho-social effects of participatory landscape planning (Abstract)]

*'''Mária Kozová & Pavlína Misíková:''' [http://www.iale.sk/download/study.mat/land.planning.pdf Landscape Planning as a strong forward looking tool for integrated spatial management]

*'''Jens Newig et al.:''' [http://www.usf.uos.de/~jnewig/Newig_Pahl-Wostl_Sigel_2005%20preprint.pdf The Role of Public Participation in Managing Uncertainty in the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive]

*'''Michael Pacione:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=546 Public participation in neighbourhood change]

*'''Judith Petts:''' [http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her132/petts.pdf Managing Public Engagement to Optimize Learning: Reflections from Urban River Restoration]

*'''Jeremy Rowan-Robinson and Roger Durman:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=547 Planning policy and planning agreements]

*'''Robert Mark Silverman:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=548 Sandwiched between Patronage and Bureaucracy: The Plight of Citizen Participation in Community-based Housing Organisations in the US]

*'''Thomas Webler & Seth Tuler:''' [http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her82/82weblertuler.pdf Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process from People in the Field]

*'''Thomas Webler et al.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=550 What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public]

*'''Thomas Webler et al.:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=551 Public Participation in Impact Assessment - A Social Learning Perspective] (Archana Bais)

*'''WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme:''' [http://www.icpdr.org/icpdr/static/dw2003_2/dw0203p09.htm Water Framework Directive and public participation]

*'''WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme:''' [http://moodle.hfwu.de/moodle/file.php/27/_Motivation_of_Planners/WWF_Danube_Carpathian_Programm_PUBLIC_PARTICIPATION_NGOs_AND_THE_WFD_IN_CENTRAL_AND_EASTERN_EUROPE.pdf PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, NGOs AND THE WFD IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE]