Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:50:49Z

Martina Sekutor:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Galgenberg Park''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Nürtingen''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Matthias Klauser, Angelo Angileri, Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Galgenberg.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg in Nürtingen is the largest public green space in the city. Unfortunately it is not frequently used although it is close to the center and there are no comparable spaces in the city. It is special, because it has a steep slope and you have a nice view on top, but from the hidden entrance you can not see the inside the park.

The park was created more than 100 years ago as an English landscape garden. In the lower part next to the Bundesstraße it has mainly meadows and an old tree stock. Some areas with bushes and trees are under nature protection, which can be a future problem, because they slowly spread each year due to low maintenance. The density of trees and shrubs are increasing in the higher zones in the west. Most paths towards are very steep or provide steps.

There is a football field, a playground, a skate park and a indoor swimming pool on the lower part. In the middle of the 20th century there was a building established for pouring out drinks from the spring in the park. Unfortunately highly enriched uranium was found in the water and so the building and the spring are shut.

The Pavilion, which was donated by Robert Reiner, whose family emigrated to the USA, is in the middle ground and in the highest spot there is the so called "Schillerhöhe", on which you can see all over Nürtingen. There you are at the edge of cultural important acres and orchards.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:49:23Z

Martina Sekutor:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Galgenberg Park''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Nürtingen''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Matthias Klauser, Angelo Angileri, Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg in Nürtingen is the largest public green space in the city. Unfortunately it is not frequently used although it is close to the center and there are no comparable spaces in the city. It is special, because it has a steep slope and you have a nice view on top, but from the hidden entrance you can not see the inside the park.

The park was created more than 100 years ago as an English landscape garden. In the lower part next to the Bundesstraße it has mainly meadows and an old tree stock. Some areas with bushes and trees are under nature protection, which can be a future problem, because they slowly spread each year due to low maintenance. The density of trees and shrubs are increasing in the higher zones in the west. Most paths towards are very steep or provide steps.

There is a football field, a playground, a skate park and a indoor swimming pool on the lower part. In the middle of the 20th century there was a building established for pouring out drinks from the spring in the park. Unfortunately highly enriched uranium was found in the water and so the building and the spring are shut.

The Pavilion, which was donated by Robert Reiner, whose family emigrated to the USA, is in the middle ground and in the highest spot there is the so called "Schillerhöhe", on which you can see all over Nürtingen. There you are at the edge of cultural important acres and orchards.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:48:09Z

Martina Sekutor:

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Galgenberg Park''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg in Nürtingen is the largest public green space in the city. Unfortunately it is not frequently used although it is close to the center and there are no comparable spaces in the city. It is special, because it has a steep slope and you have a nice view on top, but from the hidden entrance you can not see the inside the park.

The park was created more than 100 years ago as an English landscape garden. In the lower part next to the Bundesstraße it has mainly meadows and an old tree stock. Some areas with bushes and trees are under nature protection, which can be a future problem, because they slowly spread each year due to low maintenance. The density of trees and shrubs are increasing in the higher zones in the west. Most paths towards are very steep or provide steps.

There is a football field, a playground, a skate park and a indoor swimming pool on the lower part. In the middle of the 20th century there was a building established for pouring out drinks from the spring in the park. Unfortunately highly enriched uranium was found in the water and so the building and the spring are shut.

The Pavilion, which was donated by Robert Reiner, whose family emigrated to the USA, is in the middle ground and in the highest spot there is the so called "Schillerhöhe", on which you can see all over Nürtingen. There you are at the edge of cultural important acres and orchards.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:46:26Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg in Nürtingen is the largest public green space in the city. Unfortunately it is not frequently used although it is close to the center and there are no comparable spaces in the city. It is special, because it has a steep slope and you have a nice view on top, but from the hidden entrance you can not see the inside the park.

The park was created more than 100 years ago as an English landscape garden. In the lower part next to the Bundesstraße it has mainly meadows and an old tree stock. Some areas with bushes and trees are under nature protection, which can be a future problem, because they slowly spread each year due to low maintenance. The density of trees and shrubs are increasing in the higher zones in the west. Most paths towards are very steep or provide steps.

There is a football field, a playground, a skate park and a indoor swimming pool on the lower part. In the middle of the 20th century there was a building established for pouring out drinks from the spring in the park. Unfortunately highly enriched uranium was found in the water and so the building and the spring are shut.

The Pavilion, which was donated by Robert Reiner, whose family emigrated to the USA, is in the middle ground and in the highest spot there is the so called "Schillerhöhe", on which you can see all over Nürtingen. There you are at the edge of cultural important acres and orchards.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:45:33Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg in Nürtingen is the largest public green space in the city. Unfortunately it is not frequently used although it is close to the center and there are no comparable spaces in the city. It is special, because it has a steep slope and you have a nice view on top, but from the hidden entrance you can not see the inside the park.

Context The park was created more than 100 years ago as an english landscape garden. In the lower part next to the Bundesstraße it has mainly meadows and an old tree stock. Some areas with bushes and trees are under nature protection, which can be a future problem, because they slowly spread each year due to low maintenance.The density of trees and shrubs are increasing in the higher zones in the west. Most paths towards are very steep or provide steps.
Facilities There is a football field, a playground, a skate park and a indoor swimming pool on the lower part. In the middle of the 20th century there was a building established for pouring out drinks from the spring in the park. Unfortunately highly enriched uranium was found in the water and so the building and the spring are shut.
The Pavilion, which was donated by Robert Reiner, whose family emigrated to the USA, is in the middle ground and in the highest spot there is the so called "Schillerhöhe", on which you can see all over Nürtingen. There you are at the edge of cultural important acres and orchards.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:44:14Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

The Galgenberg Park in Nürtingen is the largest green area in the city. It's not frequently used even though it is close to the center and there are not many alternative large green open spaces. One special aspect is, that it has a strong slope and old stock of trees.

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:42:16Z

Martina Sekutor: /* What are the objectives of your design? */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''''Galgenberg Nürtingen - Baden-Württemberg - Germany'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=48.63010
|lng=9.326788
|zoom=15
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* you can keep this short
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

== What are the objectives of your design? ==

''Please give a short written argumentation (not more than 150 words). It is ok if you have different or even contradicting objectives within your group. Just make it explicit at the beginning of your process ''

This area seems nice and strange at the same time, nice because it is the largest green area in the city and it is very close to the center, and strange because an area like that is not very used by people, so the challenge is to create and modify something inside it to attract people.

Inside the area there are lots of interesting activities (swimming pool, soccer field, the Pavilion and so on), and also a wonderful view from the top, so we should merge all the activities and add new ones, for example we could place inside a new building that has the same functionality as the older building (because it was an important building)so that in spring people can enjoy spending time in the park. Also, thematic paths could be added to connect the contents and activities that could end with a nice view.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing.''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes), of course with an emphasis on planting design/vegetation aspects. Every group member needs to contribute at least one drawing representing his/her individual ideas.''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Design Synthesis ==
''Please analyse the individual approaches presented so far and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses (you may use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis SWOT]analysis model). Try to create a synthesis and represent it with a plan and some sketches. You can still use drawings/sketches.''

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|synthesis drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|synthesis drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|synthesis drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|synthesis drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary of the collaborative process ==
''Please reflect on your collaborative design process. Which potentials have you encountered? What was most difficult? What does collaborative design mean for you? (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Collaborative Design]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:31:36Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Planting design in Israel.jpg|''Planting design in Israel, Nature interpretation and landscape perception by Heike Kaiser, dipl.ing.msc.
This concept map describes the design and development project of the historic building and garden in Yafo, Israel through it's history, specific characteristics and conditions, demanding challenges and final design goals''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study D|Case Study D]] ===
=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group_16_1.jpg|slide 1
Image:Group_16_2.jpg|slide 2
Image:Group_16_3.jpg|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16|Collaborative Design Working Group 16]]'''===

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 16

2014-01-05T18:28:57Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_International_Perspectives_Planting_Design_2013|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Lecture Concept Map ==
*''The list with the group distribution shows you which lecture your group is supposed to document in the concept map format.''
*''Please add your collaborative concept map here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Planting design in Israel.jpg|''Planting design in Israel, Nature interpretation and landscape perception by Heike Kaiser, dipl.ing.msc.
This concept map describes the characteristics, conditions, design and development of the historic building and garden in Yafo, Israel project''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Images of Nature in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, October 30'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, December 3'''

''An 'image of nature' can be any planting design or vegetation structure. It might be on a local scale in your direct vicinity or be a part of a wider landscape structure. Each group member finds an individual page here that links to a template. You can use this template for documenting your case.''

=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study A|Case Study A]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study B|Case Study B]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C|Case Study C]] ===
=== [[Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study D|Case Study D]] ===
=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Group_16_1.jpg|slide 1
Image:Group_16_2.jpg|slide 2
Image:Group_16_3.jpg|slide 3
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Collaborative Planting Design ==

*'''Assigned: Wednesday, December 4'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 21'''

==='''[[Collaborative Design Planting Design Working Group 16|Collaborative Design Working Group 16]]'''===

----

[[Category: Planting Design 2013 Working Group]]

File:Planting design in Israel.jpg

2014-01-05T18:24:59Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-18T18:47:36Z

Martina Sekutor: /* References */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings - current state of the park" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part of the green system
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings - proposed interventions" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

Zrinjevac has been serving as a park for people for 140 years. It's basic geometrical layout has been established from the very beginning and the main elements have changed very little over time. It is constantly used by visitors which is proof of it's good design that has been attracting people for almost a century and a half. However, even good design can be improved. Due to the way the park is being maintained, certain elements make it look like it is still not finished, so there is room for some improvement.

The flower beds are being frequently replanted which makes it look newer than it actually is. In my opinion, they should be planted with perrenials and left to develop and become a constant element, so that this space could finally get a more historic, lived-in atmosphere, because it is in fact an old, historic park.

All the proposed interventions, as small as they might seem, would improve the experience of the park, because they address the issues of feeling safe and connected with the space. These propositions, due to their nature, could be considered a form of urban acupuncture, because they would be relatively small and simple actions to reveal the true character of a space.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

1. Žunić, A., Matuhina, N.: Historic squares in Zagreb before 1918. - Spatial genesis and urban characteristics (2012)

2. Karavla J.: Dendrološke karakteristike Zelene potkove Grada Zagreba s prijedlogom obnove njezinoga istočnog dijela (2006)

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-18T18:46:15Z

Martina Sekutor: /* References */

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:44:18Z

Martina Sekutor:

'''Comment of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser
'''

'''A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic'''
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…
'''

'''B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

'''C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju'''
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

'''D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo'''
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

'''Comment of case studies group 15 – Angelo Angileri'''

'''Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic'''

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

'''T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck'''

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

'''Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju'''

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

'''MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo'''

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

'''Comment of case studies group 15 – Martina Šekutor'''

'''Case study A''' – a very good view of the importance of planting design and what it can impact, nicely noticed connection between rural and urban areas, their relationship and what can be done about improving them and also the connection between landscape architecture and how they can improve people’s quality of life.

'''Case study B''' – a very interesting context of the case study, especially because of the Natura 2000 protection status, nicely noticed connection between nature and culture in the area, the suggested projective ideas seem like they could really enrich the area and sustain this important habitat.

'''Case study C''' – an interesting choice of a historical garden for the case study because of it’s context in everyday life, historic gardens are always interesting because their restoration (when necessary) and maintenance always represent a challenge today, especially because the gardens themselves represent a completely different time and landscaping aesthetics.

'''Case study D''' – an interesting case study because it is very different from any context I have had experience with, preservation of native plants is very important for any area and usually the best choice, nicely analyzed perspective of the area by the residents and the need for educating the public, very good projective ideas for connecting nature and culture.

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:42:55Z

Martina Sekutor:

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:41:49Z

Martina Sekutor:

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:40:30Z

Martina Sekutor:

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:39:22Z

Martina Sekutor:

'''Comment of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser
'''

'''A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic'''
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…
'''
'''B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

'''C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju'''
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

'''D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo'''
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

'''Comment of case studies group 15 – Angelo Angileri'''

'''Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic'''

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

'''T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck'''

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

'''Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju'''

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

'''MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo'''

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:38:11Z

Martina Sekutor:

'''Critique of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser
'''

'''A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic'''
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…
'''
'''B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

'''C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju'''
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

'''D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo'''
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

Critique of case studies group 15 – Angelo Angileri

Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-18T18:37:07Z

Martina Sekutor:

'''Critique of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser
'''
'''A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic'''
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…
'''
'''B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

'''C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju'''
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

'''D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo'''
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

Critique of case studies group 15 – Angelo Angileri

Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-11T18:15:42Z

Martina Sekutor:

Critique of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser

A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…

B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

Critique of case studies group 15 – Angelo Angileri

Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

Talk:Planting Design 2013 - Working Group 15

2013-12-11T18:15:01Z

Martina Sekutor: Created page with "Critique of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic - Lika is a lose populated area in between dense a..."

Critique of case studies group 15 – Matthias Klauser

A: Planting design and the impact on Lika, Croatia – Adriana Papic
- Lika is a lose populated area in between dense areas – development of nature is important
- Very good analysis of problems with population emigration, land prices, loss of history…
- Solve the problems with planting design – more attractive for people to live there, holistic approach with nature, culture, history – aim: gap between lifestyle of villages and cities become smaller
- Beautiful handrawn maps and pictures
- Very good analysis of the problem – good recognition: “a lot of green doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of life – it needs to be designed to give a benefit”
- Very good drawings, conceptual images
- Negative: I don’t fully understand the analytical maps and the approach…

B: t’Veld, Ardoorie, Belgium – Ruben De Coninck
- Natura 2000 area – important green areas as corridors – must be protected
- Typical: Heath and carex
- Analysis: isolation of area – cultural dynamic – cultural influence – picture -
- Projective: save the relicts by opening field ponds and draw attention
- Question from critique: How could the ponds be opened again? Is there enough ground water? What else changes when there is more water in the area? Who maintains the ponds?

C : Schleissheim Garden, Oberschleissheim, Germany – Tilak Nagaraju
- Baroque gardens with same design like in 17th centrury
- Very good explanation and summary of typical features of a baroque garden
- Lots of numbers and information – It would be very good to have the references
- Showcase of benefits and problems of baroque gardens – very good
- Good photos – unfortunately no analytical pictures
- Solution for the garden includes a large labyrinth:
o Good: Protecting plants in between labyrinth, bring structure, outdoor classroom
o Negative: Expensive in maintenance

D: MEP Matorral Espinoso Psamófilo, Uruguai – Amalia Robredo
- MEP – community with the danger of extinction due to new city development – plants are “invasive or survivors”
- Landscape designer, Plant hunter, university teacher – works are interdisciplinary with botanists, ecologists and nurseries
- Realizing the chance of “making a difference” – accepts challenge of a landscape designer
- Reasons for protecting the plants: refuge for small animals, protection of endangered species, uniqueness and beauty of the patches
- Force of natural succession and urban development
- Very good basis of knowledge, understandable approach and showcase of problems and chances for an improvement.
- Projective ideas: Save the plants – use them for gene pools for nurseries, improve the perception with info signs, ornamental designs in gardens
- Many references – good for further information
- Summary and conclusion not there yet.

ANGELO ANGILERI

Planting Design and the Impact on Lika, Croatia
Adriana Papic

Positive:
- good analysis for the actual state;
- good hand draws of the scheems that explain the actual state;
- explained very well the problematics of the region of Lika about the city and the village;
- nice planting design, that improved the green quality in Lika;
- brave idea to bring the people to the land;
- nice hand draws,

Negative:
- She wants to encourage the people to live more in the surrounding landscape and not only in the city, but that could be difficult to realize because is always difficult to bring the people from the city to the land, and this, in my opinion, would also lead to a change in the culture of the place.

T-VELD - ARDOOIE - BELGIUM
Ruben De Coninck

Positive:
- 't Veld’ is the biggest green area in the green less region of Ardooie-Tielt;
- nice choise of the area, I think is really intresting;
- protect flora and fauna;
- restore the area as it was in the past;

Negative:
-The topic is intresting but I think it must be more protect because is one of the most important green area in that Region, and is not so clear how he want to protect that.

Schleissheim Garden - Oberschleissheim - Germany
Tilak Nagaraju

Positive:
- great analysis of the Park and of the history of it;
- good exposition of the actual state of the Baroque garden (form, position etc.);
- thought about the maintenance cost of the green, the fontain, the ponds and so on..
-

Negative:
- I think there are no negative things, the only one could be that when you analyze this kind of area is difficult to modify or to get a better solution because is an historic park and most of the time you cannot do anything there,
but in this case Tilak, as engineer, analyzed more the structure of the Park and all the components that composing the park, and in my opinion he did a good job.

MEP Matorral Espinoso - Km 172 Route 10 - Uruguay
Amalia Robredo

Positive:
- Protect the native plants;
- using the native species from the MEP;
- great description of the vegetation in the actual state;
- nice approach for the problem;

Negative:
- wiki page did not finished yet;

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T23:50:15Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Summary and conclusion */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings - current state of the park" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part of the green system
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings - proposed interventions" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

Zrinjevac has been serving as a park for people for 140 years. It's basic geometrical layout has been established from the very beginning and the main elements have changed very little over time. It is constantly used by visitors which is proof of it's good design that has been attracting people for almost a century and a half. However, even good design can be improved. Due to the way the park is being maintained, certain elements make it look like it is still not finished, so there is room for some improvement.

The flower beds are being frequently replanted which makes it look newer than it actually is. In my opinion, they should be planted with perrenials and left to develop and become a constant element, so that this space could finally get a more historic, lived-in atmosphere, because it is in fact an old, historic park.

All the proposed interventions, as small as they might seem, would improve the experience of the park, because they address the issues of feeling safe and connected with the space. These propositions, due to their nature, could be considered a form of urban acupuncture, because they would be relatively small and simple actions to reveal the true character of a space.

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Bench Background.JPG

2013-12-03T23:23:23Z

Martina Sekutor: uploaded a new version of "File:Bench Background.JPG"

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:36:59Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings - current state of the park" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part of the green system
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings - proposed interventions" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:36:22Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings - current state of the park" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part of the green system
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:31:54Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part of the green system
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:30:46Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Projective drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Border Flower Beds.JPG|Border Flower Beds
Image:Central Flower Bed.JPG|Central Flower Bed
Image:Bench Background.JPG|Bench Background
Image:Music Pavilion.JPG|Music Pavilion
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Music Pavilion.JPG

2013-12-03T22:29:11Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Bench Background.JPG

2013-12-03T22:28:25Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Central Flower Bed.JPG

2013-12-03T22:27:46Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Border Flower Beds.JPG

2013-12-03T22:25:17Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:21:49Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres provide areas for relaxation, undeveloped flower beds give the impression of a work in constant progress and mature trees provide shade during the hot summer months
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-12-03T22:05:56Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe - top of the eastern part
Image:Contact Zones.jpg|Contact zones of the park - a dense urban area of building blocks that surround the park from all sides create an atmosphere of an enclosed outdoor space
Image:Natural Elements.jpg|Natural features of the design - lawn parterres, flower beds and mature trees
Image:Constructed Elements.jpg|Constructed features of the design - asphalt walkways as communicational infrastructure, fountains as focal points and The Music Pavilion in the centre as the main focal and gravitational point
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Constructed Elements.jpg

2013-12-03T21:45:38Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Natural Elements.jpg

2013-12-03T21:42:26Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Contact Zones.jpg

2013-12-03T21:39:07Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:32:15Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg|View from the Rondela
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:View from the Rondela.jpg.jpg

2013-11-27T16:31:01Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:30:11Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Image Gallery */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:View towards the Rondela.jpg|View towards the Rondela
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:View towards the Rondela.jpg

2013-11-27T16:29:05Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:08:24Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Analytical drawings */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Position_of_Zrinjevac_in_the_Green_Horseshoe.jpg|Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Position of Zrinjevac in the Green Horseshoe.jpg

2013-11-27T16:06:35Z

Martina Sekutor:

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:03:50Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 square meter (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:02:28Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Landscape and/or urban context of your case */

---> back to group page [[Planting_Design_2013_-_Working_Group_16|working group 16]]

'''NIKOLA ŠUBIĆ ZRINSKI SQUARE / ZRINJEVAC PARK'''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Zagreb''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Croatia''
|-
| '''Authors''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Šekutor''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=45.810394
|lng=15.978241
|zoom=16
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why is this case interesting? ==

''Please give a short introduction to the site you have selected (not more than 150 words)
* ''Why did you select it?''
* ''Is it exemplary for a specific theme or a problem?''
* ''In how far does it relate to your life?''

I selected this city park because of it's dramatic contrast to it's surrounding area. As an urban image of nature (or image of urban nature, depending on one's preference) it truly depicts an oasis in a densely built area and leaves quite an impact on anyone who, after roaming the more or less narrow streets suddenly comes to this open, calm but magnificent space.

This park is very popular among residents and tourists because of it's relaxing atmosphere, however it is never too crowded which makes it one of my favourite urban public spaces to spend time in.

== Author's perspective ==
''From which professional background/perspective are your documenting this case?''

As a Master student of Landscape Architecture, I find that this site serves as an example of how good design can last for decades if it is done with people in mind.

== Landscape and/or urban context of your case ==
*''Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics''
* Illustration: Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

Zrinjevac is a 23 000 m2 (cca 105 x 220m) open space area in the center of the capital of Croatia, Zagreb. It is a historic public park, officially established as a square 140 years ago, after having already served as a public market place for 40 years. It is the first major city park in the country and the starting point of a larger city park system known as the Green horseshoe (because of the U-shape) or Lenuci's horseshoe.

Milan Lenuci was a distinguished architect and urbanist in the 19th century and the author of the plan for this complex system of parks and squares which consists of 8 large public open spaces (7 squares that are used as parks and the Botanical Garden).

Zrinjevac park is located at the north end of the eastern part of the system and is only a block away from the main city square in the north (2 minute walk) and two blocks away from the Main Railway Station in the south (5 minute walk).

Over time, the elements and details of the park have been decided in a collaboration between architects, urbanists, the city governments and the citizens, but they always respected the initial idea and layout set by urbanist Rupert Melkus in the 19th century. He invisioned the space divided in 4 parts by tree lined promenades and the citizens chose trees of the platanus species. The four grass covered side parts contain water fountains and flower beds planned out by Dr. Rudolf Siebeck, the manager of Vienniese public parks of that time.

In the center there is a rondela with an open Music Pavilion since 1891. In 1884, a meteorological measuring post was placed near the north edge of the park. Both were designed by Hermann Bolle. The south edge is lined with busts of distinguished Croatian historical figures.

Over time, the trees have developed lush tree tops which provide much needed shade and refreshment in the densely populated city centre during summer months. Because of that feature, the atmosphere of the space gives it a very calming and relaxing character which constantly attracts visitors, both residents and tourists.

== Analytical drawings ==
''Please add four analytical sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) of your case and take the following aspects into account:''
* ''natural dynamic versus cultural framework - in how far do these two forces come together in your case?''
* ''dynamic through the year (you may imagine how the site looks in spring and summer, maybe you also remember it)''
* ''highlight potentials and problems''

<gallery caption="Analytical Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|analytical drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|analytical drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|analytical drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|analytical drawing 4
</gallery>

== Projective drawings ==
* ''Please add four projective sketches/drawings (or montages/schemes) for your case and take the following aspects into account:''
** ''How would you like this case to change in the near future? (in 1-2 years)''
** ''And how could it look like in 10-15 years?''

<gallery caption="Projective Drawings " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|projective drawing 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|projective drawing 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|projective drawing 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|projective drawing 4
</gallery>

== Summary and conclusion ==
''Please summarize your case and give arguments for your projective design (approx 150 words).''

== Image Gallery ==
''You may add a series of images/photos in addition to the sketches/drawings''

<gallery caption="Image Gallery" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:yourfilename1.jpg|image 1
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|image 2
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|image 3
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|image 4
</gallery>

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Planting Design 2013 Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:01:43Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Author's perspective */

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-27T16:00:58Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Rationale: Why is this case interesting? */

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-12T23:56:09Z

Martina Sekutor: /* Rationale: Why is this case interesting? */

File:Zagreb areal view (5).jpg

2013-11-12T23:51:51Z

Martina Sekutor: uploaded a new version of "File:Zagreb areal view (5).jpg": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zagreb_areal_view_(5).jpg

Planting Design 2013 Working Group 16 - Case Study C

2013-11-12T23:47:48Z

Martina Sekutor:

File:Zagreb areal view (5).jpg

2013-11-12T23:46:06Z

Martina Sekutor: