Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-12-21T01:52:09Z

Arberk: /* Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:Klaudia_cmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Participation Discourse and Concepts: "Who plans the planning?" (By: Klaudia Jaskula)''
Image:GropuF_Final_Synthesis.cmap.jpg|''Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1: Służew Przemysłowy, Warsaw]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

File:GropuF Final Synthesis.cmap.jpg

2015-12-21T01:50:27Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-12-11T19:31:12Z

Arberk: /* Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

File:A K Landcape Concepts.JPG

2015-12-11T19:28:54Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-12-10T17:20:26Z

Arberk: /* Presentation Slides Assignment 3 */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

File:Commonalities1.JPG

2015-12-10T17:16:43Z

Arberk:

File:Akira2.JPG

2015-12-10T17:16:18Z

Arberk:

File:Akira1.JPG

2015-12-10T17:15:57Z

Arberk:

File:Arber2.JPG

2015-12-10T17:15:27Z

Arberk:

File:Arber1.JPG

2015-12-10T17:14:57Z

Arberk:

File:Klaudia2.JPG

2015-12-10T17:13:14Z

Arberk:

File:Klaudia1.jpg

2015-12-10T17:10:50Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:55:07Z

Arberk: /* Representation of your observations */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2015). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT_Stop_3D.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:Waterloo1.jpg|LRT Phase 1
Image:LRT road map.png|LRT Road Map
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:50:23Z

Arberk: /* Representation of your observations */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2015). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT_Stop_3D.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:Waterloo1.jpg|case representation
Image:LRT_road_map.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:LRT road map.png

2015-11-26T19:47:19Z

Arberk:

File:Waterloo1.jpg

2015-11-26T19:45:59Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:26:47Z

Arberk: /* Representation of your observations */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2015). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT_Stop_3D.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:LRT Stop 3D.jpg

2015-11-26T19:25:15Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:24:11Z

Arberk: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2015). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:23:35Z

Arberk: /* References */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2010). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:22:38Z

Arberk: /* References */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2010). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Desmon, Paige (September 23, 2015). LRT Delays? Project faces challenges in Kitchener and Waterloo. Revealed on Nov. 26, 2015 from www.therecord.com''

''* Waterloo Region (2010). The ION Story. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/TheIONStory.pdf''

''* Waterloo Region (2015). Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit from Kitchener to Cambridge: Public Information Package. Revealed on Nov. 25, 2015 from http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/multimedialibrary/resources/RT_ION_Information_package_Nov2015_FINAL_access.pdf ''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:10:39Z

Arberk: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings (Waterloo Region, 2010). In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved (Waterloo Region, 2010).

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T19:09:12Z

Arberk: /* What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan (Waterloo Region, 2010). Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed (Waterloo Region, 2010).

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late (Desmond, 2015).

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T18:59:02Z

Arberk: /* What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan. Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed.

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late.

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T18:57:15Z

Arberk: /* What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planned since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan. Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed.

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-26T18:55:44Z

Arberk: /* What are the major challenges for changing the situation? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for Light Rail Transit situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project. The entire project has been democratically planed since 1976, when it was first presented in the Regional Official Policies Plan. Accordingly, the Region Council had the support from the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, following the completion of an extensive public consultation prior to the implementation of the LRT project. Between 2006 and 2011, Regional staff hosted more than 150 public outreach events, and more than 30 public centres were held on which the communities could give their input as well as ask question when needed.

The only challenge that LRT project might face is to fall behind the schedule because the train manufacturer might deliver them late.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T22:42:52Z

Arberk: /* What are the major challenges for changing the situation? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
With respect to landscape and democracy there are not any challenges for light rail transit project but it might fall behind the schedule. (http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5927792-lrt-delays-project-faces-challenges-in-kitchener-and-waterloo/)

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T22:33:02Z

Arberk:

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:blue"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:blue"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T19:47:50Z

Arberk:

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:red"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:wheat"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:wheat"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:red"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:red"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T18:57:56Z

Arberk: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

In conclusion, this case represents a positive approach in terms of landscape and democracy because there is a lot of community engagement and public input of which residents' feedback has played a key role in every LRT decision.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T18:27:17Z

Arberk: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-25T18:26:25Z

Arberk: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Waterloo Region, Ontario''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Canada''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Arber Krasniqi''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:LRT1.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=43.46519
|lng=-80.52237
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
* The ongoing light rail transit (LRT) project has been chosen as a case for the landscape and democracy seminar because it plays a crucial role to the future of Waterloo Region and attempts to enhance the quality of local citizens' life. The fundamental goals of LRT project are to move people more efficiently in and around the community, limit urban sprawl, and save farmlands through the protection and preservation of the environment. With the light rail transit, the Region of Waterloo (which includes the City of Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge) saves 500 new lane kilometres of roads over the next 20 years along with 1.4 billion dollars of savings. In other words, without LRT road improvements and expansions in these cities do not offer the same level of development opportunities that light rail transit does.

For all citizens' of Waterloo Region, light rail transit (LRT) will provide plenty of benefits as well as will help the community to preserve a unique quality of life. In suburban areas, development of such a project helps to limit overall traffic congestion and cut-through traffic in existing neighbourhoods; in city centres, creates connected communities; and in rural areas, region's agricultural lands, natural beauty and rural lifestyle will remain preserved.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T20:15:23Z

Arberk:

File:Waterloo Region map.png

2015-11-24T20:04:28Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T19:36:57Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T19:35:40Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-24T19:34:05Z

Arberk: /* Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T19:25:53Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-24T19:20:01Z

Arberk: /* Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo ]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T15:52:21Z

Arberk: /* Representation of your observations */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates (lat + lng) and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=71.295556
|lng=-156.766389
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
* brief explanation in essay style, approx 150 words

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:LRT1.jpg|Light Rail Transit
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2

2015-11-24T15:49:39Z

Arberk: /* Representation of your observations */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''Please add the title of your case study here, adjust the map coordinates (lat + lng) and replace the moa image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' add name''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add location''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add country''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''add author''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Moa.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=71.295556
|lng=-156.766389
|zoom=8
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
* brief explanation in essay style, approx 150 words

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Design Synthesis Drawings" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
[[Image.A_K_LRT.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename2.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

*Please add approx. 150 words for each questions

== References ==
''* Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''

''* Do not use images of which you do not hold the copyright.''

''* Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:LRT1.jpg

2015-11-24T15:31:32Z

Arberk:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-24T15:20:08Z

Arberk: /* Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region ]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-24T15:17:22Z

Arberk: /* Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region ]] ===
Arber Krasniqi

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-24T15:13:47Z

Arberk: /* Working Group F - Case Study 2 */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region ]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]