Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2016-01-26T19:44:18Z

Akirai: /* Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:Klaudia_cmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Participation Discourse and Concepts: "Who plans the planning?" (By: Klaudia Jaskula)''
Image:GropuF_Final_Synthesis.cmap.jpg|''Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1: Służew Przemysłowy, Warsaw]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3:Route 54 in Shimokitazawa]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:Working Group F Slide (1).JPG|slide 1
Image:Working Group F Slide (2).JPG|slide 2
Image:Working Group F Slide (3).JPG|slide 3
Image:Working Group F Slide (4).JPG|slide 4
Image:Working Group F Slide (5).JPG|slide 5
Image:Working Group F Slide (6).JPG|slide 6
Image:Working Group F Slide (7).JPG|slide 7
Image:Working Group F Slide (8).JPG|slide 8
Image:Working Group F Slide (9).JPG|slide 9
Image:Working Group F Slide (10).JPG|slide 10
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2016-01-26T19:43:50Z

Akirai: /* Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:Klaudia_cmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Participation Discourse and Concepts: "Who plans the planning?" (By: Klaudia Jaskula)''
Image:GropuF_Final_Synthesis.cmap.jpg|''Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1: Służew Przemysłowy, Warsaw]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3:Route 54 in Shimokitazawa]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="6">
Image:Working Group F Slide (1).JPG|slide 1
Image:Working Group F Slide (2).JPG|slide 2
Image:Working Group F Slide (3).JPG|slide 3
Image:Working Group F Slide (4).JPG|slide 4
Image:Working Group F Slide (5).JPG|slide 5
Image:Working Group F Slide (6).JPG|slide 6
Image:Working Group F Slide (7).JPG|slide 7
Image:Working Group F Slide (8).JPG|slide 8
Image:Working Group F Slide (9).JPG|slide 9
Image:Working Group F Slide (10).JPG|slide 10
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

File:Working Group F Slide (10).JPG

2016-01-26T19:41:36Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (9).JPG

2016-01-26T19:41:25Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (8).JPG

2016-01-26T19:41:15Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (7).JPG

2016-01-26T19:41:04Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (6).JPG

2016-01-26T19:40:53Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (5).JPG

2016-01-26T19:40:42Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (4).JPG

2016-01-26T19:40:31Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (3).JPG

2016-01-26T19:40:19Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (2).JPG

2016-01-26T19:40:02Z

Akirai:

File:Working Group F Slide (1).JPG

2016-01-26T19:39:36Z

Akirai:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2016-01-26T19:37:10Z

Akirai: /* Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:Klaudia_cmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Participation Discourse and Concepts: "Who plans the planning?" (By: Klaudia Jaskula)''
Image:GropuF_Final_Synthesis.cmap.jpg|''Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1: Służew Przemysłowy, Warsaw]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3:Route 54 in Shimokitazawa]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="6">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 6
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 7
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 8
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 9
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 10
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 11
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2016-01-26T15:03:01Z

Akirai: /* Working Group F - Case Study 3 */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:Klaudia_cmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Participation Discourse and Concepts: "Who plans the planning?" (By: Klaudia Jaskula)''
Image:GropuF_Final_Synthesis.cmap.jpg|''Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1: Służew Przemysłowy, Warsaw]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3:Route 54 in Shimokitazawa]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-26T10:54:57Z

Akirai: /* Concluding reflections */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there was no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|onion model
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai2.jpg|relation matrix
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai3.png|power-interest graph
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="300px" heights="600px" perrow="1">
File:Change_Scenario_ai.png|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model in Japan.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-26T08:47:03Z

Akirai: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there was no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|onion model
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai2.jpg|relation matrix
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai3.png|power-interest graph
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="300px" heights="600px" perrow="1">
File:Change_Scenario_ai.png|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:48:38Z

Akirai: /* Change Scenario */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|onion model
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai2.jpg|relation matrix
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai3.png|power-interest graph
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="300px" heights="600px" perrow="1">
File:Change_Scenario_ai.png|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:45:33Z

Akirai: /* Stakeholder Mapping */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|onion model
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai2.jpg|relation matrix
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai3.png|power-interest graph
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

''Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Visualize a scenario illustrating how these methods/tools can be applied within an imagined time frame ''

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mychange szenario.JPG|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:45:12Z

Akirai: /* Stakeholder Mapping */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|onyon model
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai2.jpg|relation matrix
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai3.png|power-interest graph
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

''Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Visualize a scenario illustrating how these methods/tools can be applied within an imagined time frame ''

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mychange szenario.JPG|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:39:53Z

Akirai: /* Stakeholder Mapping */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

''Create a visual representation of the stakeholder groups that are involved in your case. Try to cover the following aspects in your representation: Power (high, medium, low) / Support (positive, neutral, negative)/ Influence (high or low)/ Need (strong, medium, weak)+ also map the relationships between the stakeholder groups''

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Analysis1" widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:Stakeholder_Analysis_ai1.png|Stakeholder Map
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

''Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Visualize a scenario illustrating how these methods/tools can be applied within an imagined time frame ''

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mychange szenario.JPG|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:Change Scenario ai.png

2016-01-25T08:37:14Z

Akirai:

File:Stakeholder Analysis ai3.png

2016-01-25T08:36:18Z

Akirai: Akirai uploaded a new version of "File:Stakeholder Analysis ai3.png"

File:Stakeholder Analysis ai3.png

2016-01-25T08:34:54Z

Akirai:

File:Stakeholder Analysis ai2.jpg

2016-01-25T08:34:35Z

Akirai:

File:Stakeholder Analysis ai1.png

2016-01-25T08:34:16Z

Akirai:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:32:33Z

Akirai: /* Concluding reflections */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

''Create a visual representation of the stakeholder groups that are involved in your case. Try to cover the following aspects in your representation: Power (high, medium, low) / Support (positive, neutral, negative)/ Influence (high or low)/ Need (strong, medium, weak)+ also map the relationships between the stakeholder groups''

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mystakeholermap.JPG|Stakeholder Map
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

''Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Visualize a scenario illustrating how these methods/tools can be applied within an imagined time frame ''

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mychange szenario.JPG|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
This change model has potential about how to manage partnership-based town development. There is only a few good participation project in Japan. If this scenario become reality, it could function as one of the example of right resident participation project. Feasibility of this scenario is growing nowadays because the city mayor has changed to more resident-friendly parson. Though this scenario is a little bit poor compared with world basic, I hope this become start point of right resident participation model.

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2016-01-25T08:32:13Z

Akirai: /* Cross cutting theme */

---> back to group page [[Landscape_Democracy_2015_-_Working_Group_F|working group F]]

'''''What is the right resident participation – think about issue of the planning road Route 54'''''

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Shimokitazawa''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Tokyo''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Japan''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Akira Iguro''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Shimokitazawa.JPG|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| {{#widget:GoogleMaps
|width=300
|height=200
|lat=35.661528
|lng=139.667361
|zoom=10
|centermarker=yes
|maptypecontrol=yes
|overviewmapcontrol=yes
|largemapcontrol=yes
|scalecontrol=yes
}}
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==
Shimokitazawa, one of the Japanese urban areas, has expanded around the railway station and there are a lot of naturally-made alleys, which has human-scale proportions of the road’s width and the building height. There are many liberal intellectual people and good students who move up to Tokyo from rural regions. Therefore this town is known as “town for the youth” or “fashionable town” and always changing with those people. The landscape has been changed gradually, and the neighborhood accepted it naturally. At the moment, from the aspect of efficiency and accident prevention, wide road and high rise buildings were planned by government in this area and they decided to place the railway around this area underground. Of course the residents were against this decision to preserve their unique culture and landscape. In addition they held several citizens’ workshops to think about using the former railway land but there were no response from the government. I think this case is very important for thinking about whole concept of right resident participation.

== Representation of your observations ==
* you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques
* possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay
* please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like

<gallery caption="Observations" widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Diagram1.jpg|Change of the relationship between the building and the streets in Shimokitazawa
Image:Diagram_2.jpg|City planning road Route 54 and anxiety of residents
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===

It is quite difficult to change the plan of route 54 because of existing law of Japan. However issue of placing the railway underground has reviewed with new city mayor. Accordingly, citizen group called “greenline Shimokitazawa” has been set up by resident. They are seeking for a new framework of the city planning and social system with government and specialist using examples from High Line in New York, promenade in Paris and like that things.

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===

A starting point for democratically-based change is to forge relations among all actors. In my case, resident and specialist or government worked together but there is no relations among these three groups.　Although there were several debates between resident and government, and few suggestions of resident and specialist, these didn’t work well or just were ignored by government. Therefore it is very important to build relations among these actors from kickoff point of project. In addition, to put university as specialist which is constructed by professor and several students would be a better method to realize this idea. If government offer a public project to university and university provides the project to students as part of class, government could save on costs and students could study in practical situation. Additionally, resident could learn effective method of participation from university and they would be able to provide a useful opinion to government. Furthermore young students might add vitality to resident. In other words, each of three could get some benefit from each other.

[[Image:structure.png|150px]]

== Stakeholder Mapping ==

''Create a visual representation of the stakeholder groups that are involved in your case. Try to cover the following aspects in your representation: Power (high, medium, low) / Support (positive, neutral, negative)/ Influence (high or low)/ Need (strong, medium, weak)+ also map the relationships between the stakeholder groups''

<gallery caption="Stakeholder Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mystakeholermap.JPG|Stakeholder Map
</gallery>

== Change Scenario ==

''Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Visualize a scenario illustrating how these methods/tools can be applied within an imagined time frame ''

<gallery caption="Change Scenario" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:mychange szenario.JPG|Change Scenario
</gallery>

== Cross cutting theme ==
All of the cases in Group E is related to infrastructure project. There are various situation and approach to solve its problem but all projects impact on respective landscape. Therefore, at times, infrastructural change is needed, at other times, it is not needed. In Shimokitazawa case, this change is rejected by neighborhood residents because Shimokitazawa has unique interesting landscape loved by people. Infrastructure project often result in huge scale development and destroy existing landscape. Shimokitazawa case is no exception. This project and future development like this should be more sensitive to influence itself. The project that support existing landscape and new development at the same time is needed.

== Concluding reflections ==
Reflect on your case and your change model. Potentials? Limitations? (approx. 150 words)

== References ==
''Yurika,T & Masami,K/edited by Greenline Shimokitazawa. DNA of Shimokitazawa:New Horizons for a Livable and Attractive Neighborhood. Tokyo, X-knowledge Inc, 2015, 256p''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Case Study]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-12-12T09:53:39Z

Akirai: /* Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:The_European_Landscape_Convention_by_A.I.jpg|''Concept map 1 - The European Landscape Convention(By: Akira Iguro)''
Image:A_K_Landcape_Concepts.JPG|''Concept map 2 - Landscape Concepts (By: Arber Krasniqi)''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:Klaudia1.jpg|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Klaudia2.JPG|Służewiec Przemysłowy
Image:Arber1.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Arber2.JPG|Light Rail Transit
Image:Akira1.JPG|Route 54
Image:Akira2.JPG|Route 54
Image:Commonalities1.JPG|Commonalities
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design - Change Models ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

File:The European Landscape Convention by A.I.jpg

2015-12-12T09:51:40Z

Akirai:

File:Diagram 2.jpg

2015-11-28T14:57:22Z

Akirai: Akirai uploaded a new version of "File:Diagram 2.jpg"

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T13:12:52Z

Akirai: /* What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? */

File:Structure.png

2015-11-28T13:11:05Z

Akirai:

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T12:30:02Z

Akirai: /* What are the major challenges for changing the situation? */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T08:39:29Z

Akirai: /* References */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T08:09:20Z

Akirai: /* Representation of your observations */

File:Diagram 2.jpg

2015-11-28T08:06:36Z

Akirai: Akirai uploaded a new version of "File:Diagram 2.jpg"

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T08:02:02Z

Akirai: /* Representation of your observations */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T07:56:48Z

Akirai: /* What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T07:56:22Z

Akirai: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T07:55:24Z

Akirai: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-28T07:54:46Z

Akirai: /* What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? */

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-27T14:40:29Z

Akirai:

File:Diagram 2.jpg

2015-11-27T14:34:51Z

Akirai:

File:Shimokitazawa.JPG

2015-11-27T14:31:40Z

Akirai:

File:Diagram1.jpg

2015-11-27T14:28:31Z

Akirai:

Landscape Democracy 2015 - Working Group F

2015-11-26T15:24:02Z

Akirai: /* Working Group F - Case Study 3 */

--> Back to [[Working_Groups_Seminar_Landscape Democracy 2015|working group overview]]

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Each member has an individual page for documenting his/her personal case. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!
''

== Assignment 2 - Concept Mapping of Seminar Topics ==
*''You can read more details about this assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_2:_Concept_Mapping_of_Seminar_Topics|here]]''
*''Please add your concept maps here by replacing the dummy image. Your map needs to have a new file name:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 1 - Theme context:Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 2 - Theme context:Landscape Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 3 - Theme context:Participation Discourse and Concepts''
Image:yourconceptmap.jpg|''Concept map 4 - Theme context:Group Synthesis of the three themes''
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Landscape Democracy Cases in your Environment ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, October 27'''
*'''Due: Monday, November 30'''

''There is one template page for each group member. You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy_Assignment_3:_Landscape_democracy_cases_in_your_environment|here]] ''

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 1|Working Group F - Case Study 1]] ===
Klaudia Jaskula, Służew przemysłowy, Warsaw, Poland

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 2|Working Group F - Case Study 2: LRT in Waterloo Region]] ===
Arber Krasniqi, Kitchener, ON, Canada

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3|Working Group F - Case Study 3]] ===
Akira Iguro, Shimokitazawa, Tokyo, Japan

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 4|Working Group F - Case Study 4]] ===

=== [[Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 5|Working Group F - Case Study 5]] ===

=== Presentation Slides Assignment 3 ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 4 - Landscape and Democracy: Collaborative Project ==

*'''Assigned: Tuesday, December 1'''
*'''Due: Tuesday, January 25'''

* Your case study templates will be extended with additional sectionsn for documenting a change model
* You can read more about the assignment [[Landscape_and_Democracy:_Collaborative_Project|here]]

=== Presentation Slides Collaborative Design ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:groupF_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:groupF_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupF_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:groupF_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:groupF_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

----

[[Category: Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group]]

Landscape Democracy 2015 Working Group F - Case Study 3

2015-11-26T15:20:57Z

Akirai: