Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:16:30Z

91.10.214.19: /* Future development directions */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

* The project is also an example of a collaboration between architecture and landscape-architecture at the aim to improve living conditions in cities

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Critical decisions appeared when woodland, which developed through ecological succession was cleared in order to make the renovated wall visible.

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:16:05Z

91.10.214.19: /* Spatial analysis of area/project/plan */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

* The project is also an example of a collaboration between architecture and landscape-architecture at the aim to improve living conditions in cities

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Critical decisions appeared when woodland, which developed through ecological succession was cleared in order to make the renovated wall visible.

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:11:59Z

91.10.214.19: /* Analysis of design/planning process */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

* The project is also an example of a collaboration between architecture and landscape-architecture at the aim to improve living conditions in cities

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:11:37Z

91.10.214.19: /* Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

* The project is also an example of a collaboration between architecture and landscape-architecture at the aim to improve living conditions in cities

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:11:16Z

91.10.214.19: /* Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

* The project is also an example of collaboration between architecture and landscape-architecture at the aim to improve living conditions in cities

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:09:26Z

91.10.214.19: /* Peer reviews or critique */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
Not yet
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:08:33Z

91.10.214.19: /* Future development directions */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

* Are there any future goals?
The main goal is to close the green belt and to connect it to the city
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:07:36Z

91.10.214.19: /* Analysis of design/planning process */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
The sections have a very reduced design.
Design Elements are mainly meadows with trees, ways made of coloured asphalt, formed hedges

*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
The project is promoted by the European Union
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:06:32Z

91.10.214.19: /* Points of success and limitations */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Develop the encouragement of living and housing at the old town

Improve the living conditions of visitors and citizens

Develop the variety of using

Conserve and emphasize the unmistakeable

Urban ecology (Problems with design)

Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:05:36Z

91.10.214.19: /* Analysis of program/function */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
Sanitation to the ramparts
New town entrance at the „Mühltor“
Linking the old town quarters through stairs, ramps and footbridges
Playgrounds for all age groups
Areas of sitting and experience
Designed for extensive maintenance of Parks (Trees and meadows)
Areas of retreating for small animals and birds

* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Removal of industrial waste land and business areas at the ramparts
Demolition of inconvenient buildings
Shifting the parking garage Marienbach to the quarter „Krumme Gasse/ Am Oberen Wall“

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:03:15Z

91.10.214.19: /* Spatial analysis of area/project/plan */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatially divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:02:50Z

91.10.214.19: /* Spatial analysis of area/project/plan */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatial divided:

Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009

Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020

Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:02:15Z

91.10.214.19: /* Spatial analysis of area/project/plan */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city

The whole area is chronological and spatial divided:
Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:01:35Z

91.10.214.19: /* Spatial analysis of area/project/plan */

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
There are two main features:
The fortification and the city
The whole area is chronological and spatial divided:
Section I from Upper Gate to the River Main from 1997-2009
Section II from Fichtel`s Garden to Rückert-Street 2008-2020
Section III from Old Cemetery to Gutermann-Promenade

*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T20:00:49Z

91.10.214.19:

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Schweinfurt was a formerly free realm city
The first reconstruction of the city appeared after the second city spoiling in the Markgräfler war in 1554
In the 16. Century the defensive wall in the east was built.
In the 30years war (1618-1648) the town was developed by the Swedish (General Wrangel)
The city was particularly military because of Kiliansberg, a fortress on the eastern side
In the beginning of 19. Century the ramparts were sold, the ditches were filled up and the erosion of towers and gates began.

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Schweinfurt

2008-11-23T19:59:46Z

91.10.214.19:

'''The creation of a green belt as an impulse for urban regeneration in Schweinfurt (Germany)'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Green belt Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Urban regeneration''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Markus Peter''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''2009 (1. Section - "Upper Gate" to river Main)''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''City of Schweinfurt''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''9,0 Mio € (1. Section of the green belt)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:Philosopher`s_Walk2klein2.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="50.049864" lon="10.23325" type="satellite" zoom="14" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
*The case study shows the ability of the revitalisation of a city as a co-operation of old town renewal and the creation of a green belt''

* Old towns are very typical for european cities. Nowadays they lack in a population movement from within towns and cities to the rural-urban fringe. This project shows how old towns can be strenghtened

=== Author's perspective ===
* The influence of landscape architecture into the revitalisation of old towns, their abilities and limitations.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Schweinfurt lies into the so called “Basin of Schweinfurt”, with a comparatively hot and dry climate (viniculture). This is increased due to the special urban climate which leads to a raising of the normal temperature up to 3-4 degree centigrade

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework
Schweinfurt is a town with about 55.000 inhabitants, located at the river Main and is a city of the industry and art
It has a historical old part of town
Schweinfurt has a very huge impact on metal industry, especially ball bearings industry.
The colour Schweinfurt green which was very popular in the 19t.th century was also invented and produced there. Unfortunately this pigment contains very huge cocentrations of heavy metal, especially arsenic.
Various depots of this substance can be found throughout the city and their parks.

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category: Green structure planning - Strategies and policies]]
[[Category:Green Belt]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Schweinfurt]
[[Category:Working Group Green Structure Planning]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories