Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

LANDMAP assessment in Wales

2009-05-25T08:40:32Z

90.224.111.43: /* Landscape and/or urban context */

'''LANDMAP assessment in Neath-Port Talbot, Wales''' by ''Andrew Butler''

--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot LANDMAP assessment''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the town/area name''
|-
| '''Wales''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the country here''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Office''' || style="background:Lavender"|''office or planner/designer''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the client here''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| '''Case study author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter your name(s)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.960766" lon="-18.918457" zoom="6" width="300" height="200">
http://
64.947899, -19.196045
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
Although the Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method of characterising landscape used in England and Scotland is relatively well known, there is also a method which provides complete coverage of Wales, which takes a slightly different approach. This method of landscape assessment constitutes a multi-disciplnary approach to landscape assessment and characterisation. Although not an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach, the LANDMAP methodology encompases multiple aspects of landscape providing a relatively holstic assessment.

Yet there are some weaknesses within this method as with all methods, firstly it is extremly timeconsuming and thus expensive and secondly; and as is the case with many assessments and landscape planning projects there is a lack of public involvement.

=== Author's perspective ===
I am at present a PhD student, with my focus on - landscape assessment of the urban fringe and how the publics perceptions of these landscapes can incorporated within the assessment. I have been working on my PhD for approximatly 9 months, prior to this I have worked as a consultant in both the UK and Sweden with landscape assessments taking up a significant amount of my work load.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
The study area is located in the south of Wales and covers approximately 442 sq km, rising from sea level at Swansea Bay in the south to approximately 600m AOD at Craig y Llyn, in the east. The
The south is dominated by the coastal plain which is dominated by communictaion corridors and urban structures, including the settlements of Neath and Port-Talbot as well as heavy industry.
From the coast the land rises to the coal measure plateau which is deeply dissected by valleys, the two larger being the Neath and Tawe.

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Landscape Assessment]]
[[Category: LANDMAP assessment in Wales]]
[[Category: Great Britain]]
[[Category: Wales]]
[[Category: Neath-Port Talbot]]
[[Category: WG Landscape Perception, Assessment and Landscape Change]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LANDMAP assessment in Wales

2009-05-25T08:28:43Z

90.224.111.43:

'''LANDMAP assessment in Neath-Port Talbot, Wales''' by ''Andrew Butler''

--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot LANDMAP assessment''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the town/area name''
|-
| '''Wales''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the country here''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Office''' || style="background:Lavender"|''office or planner/designer''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the client here''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| '''Case study author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter your name(s)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.960766" lon="-18.918457" zoom="6" width="300" height="200">
http://
64.947899, -19.196045
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
Although the Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method of characterising landscape used in England and Scotland is relatively well known, there is also a method which provides complete coverage of Wales, which takes a slightly different approach. This method of landscape assessment constitutes a multi-disciplnary approach to landscape assessment and characterisation. Although not an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach, the LANDMAP methodology encompases multiple aspects of landscape providing a relatively holstic assessment.

Yet there are some weaknesses within this method as with all methods, firstly it is extremly timeconsuming and thus expensive and secondly; and as is the case with many assessments and landscape planning projects there is a lack of public involvement.

=== Author's perspective ===
I am at present a PhD student, with my focus on - landscape assessment of the urban fringe and how the publics perceptions of these landscapes can incorporated within the assessment. I have been working on my PhD for approximatly 9 months, prior to this I have worked as a consultant in both the UK and Sweden with landscape assessments taking up a significant amount of my work load.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Landscape Assessment]]
[[Category: LANDMAP assessment in Wales]]
[[Category: Great Britain]]
[[Category: Wales]]
[[Category: Neath-Port Talbot]]
[[Category: WG Landscape Perception, Assessment and Landscape Change]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LANDMAP assessment in Wales

2009-05-25T08:25:27Z

90.224.111.43: /* Author's perspective */

'''LANDMAP assessment in Neath-Port Talbot, Wales''' by ''Andrew Butler''

--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot LANDMAP assessment''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the town/area name''
|-
| '''Wales''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the country here''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Office''' || style="background:Lavender"|''office or planner/designer''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the client here''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| '''Case study author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter your name(s)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.960766" lon="-18.918457" zoom="6" width="300" height="200">
http://
64.947899, -19.196045
</googlemap>
|}

Although the Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method of characterising landscape used in England and Scotland is relatively well known, there is also a method which provides complete coverage of Wales, which takes a slightly different approach. This method of landscape assessment constitutes a multi-disciplnary approach to landscape assessment and characterisation. Although not an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach, the LANDMAP methodology encompases multiple aspects of landscape providing a relatively holstic assessment.

Yet there are some weaknesses within this method as with all methods, firstly it is extremly timeconsuming and thus expensive and secondly; and as is the case with many assessments and landscape planning projects there is a lack of public involvement.

I am at present a PhD student, with my focus on - landscape assessment of the urban fringe and how the publics perceptions of these landscapes can incorporated within the assessment. I have been working on my PhD for approximatly 9 months, prior to this I have worked as a consultant in both the UK and Sweden with landscape assessments taking up a significant amount of my work load.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Landscape Assessment]]
[[Category: LANDMAP assessment in Wales]]
[[Category: Great Britain]]
[[Category: Wales]]
[[Category: Neath-Port Talbot]]
[[Category: WG Landscape Perception, Assessment and Landscape Change]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LANDMAP assessment in Wales

2009-05-25T07:23:36Z

90.224.111.43: /* Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? */

'''LANDMAP assessment in Neath-Port Talbot, Wales''' by ''Andrew Butler''

--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot LANDMAP assessment''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Neath Port-Talbot''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the town/area name''
|-
| '''Wales''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the country here''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Office''' || style="background:Lavender"|''office or planner/designer''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the client here''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| '''Case study author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter your name(s)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.960766" lon="-18.918457" zoom="6" width="300" height="200">
http://
64.947899, -19.196045
</googlemap>
|}

Although the Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method of characterising landscape used in England and Scotland is relatively well known, there is also a method which provides complete coverage of Wales, which takes a slightly different approach. This method of landscape assessment constitutes a multi-disciplnary approach to landscape assessment and characterisation. Although not an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach, the LANDMAP methodology encompases multiple aspects of landscape providing a relatively holstic assessment.

Yet there are some weaknesses within this method as with all methods, firstly it is extremly timeconsuming and thus expensive and secondly; and as is the case with many assessments and landscape planning projects there is a lack of public involvement.

=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please answer from your '''personal''' perspective.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Landscape Assessment]]
[[Category: LANDMAP assessment in Wales]]
[[Category: Great Britain]]
[[Category: Wales]]
[[Category: Neath-Port Talbot]]
[[Category: WG Landscape Perception, Assessment and Landscape Change]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LANDMAP assessment in Wales

2009-05-25T07:21:08Z

90.224.111.43: /* Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? */

'''LANDMAP assessment in Neath-Port Talbot, Wales''' by ''Andrew Butler''

--> Back to [[Rural Landscapes Seminar Case Study List]]

{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the town/area name''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the country here''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Office''' || style="background:Lavender"|''office or planner/designer''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the client here''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| '''Case study author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter your name(s)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.960766" lon="-18.918457" zoom="6" width="300" height="200">
http://
64.947899, -19.196045
</googlemap>
|}

Although the Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method of characterising landscape used in England and Scotland is relatively well known, there is also a method which provides complete coverage of Wales, which takes a slightly different approach. This method of landscape assessment constitutes a multi-disciplnary approach to landscape assessment and characterisation. Although not an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach, the LANDMAP methodology encompases multiple aspects of landscape providing a relatively holstic assessment.

Yet there are some weaknesses within this method as with all methods, firstly it is extremly timeconsuming and thus expensive and secondly; and as is the case with many assessments and landscape planning projects there is a lack of public involvement.

=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study? Please answer from your '''personal''' perspective.

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case study]]
[[Category:Rural landscapes]]
[[Category: Landscape Assessment]]
[[Category: LANDMAP assessment in Wales]]
[[Category: Great Britain]]
[[Category: Wales]]
[[Category: Neath-Port Talbot]]
[[Category: WG Landscape Perception, Assessment and Landscape Change]]
About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

Uggledal

2008-12-08T13:42:39Z

90.224.111.43: /* Cultural/social/political context */

'''Uggledal, Göteborg - Comprehensive Plan'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Göteborg''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sweden''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Andrew Butler''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="57.699745" lon="11.930466" type="satellite" zoom="11" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
The case study looks at the development of local forums for public participation in the process of detail planning and design within a new housing area, allowing an interchange of knowledge which facilitates improves outcomes. The project also illustrates how the “landscape” can function as an arena and focus points for communications relating to balancing growth issues with public needs.

=== Author's perspective ===
I come to this case study in the start of my PhD education. The subject I have chosen to study for the next 4 years relates to the inclusion of public perception within the analysis of the urban fringe landscape, this is mirrored in my case study
Over the subsequent 10 years I have studied and worked as a landscape architect and landscape planner, focusing on landscape analysis and trying to understand the multi faceted entity that is landscape and the meanings and values attached to ‘landscape’

Göteborg, Sweden’s second largest city with a population of 494 806 (Statistiska centralbyrån), lies on the country’s west coast.
Uggledal is situated in the south of the kommun forming an easily accessible suburb to the city. The area is comprised of new housing situated between the coast and the abrupt granite hills which dominate this area of Västra Gotaland county. It has been described by recent developers as “Housing area in harmony with nature”

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Participation]]
[[Category:Sweden]]
[[Category:Göteborg]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Uggledal

2008-12-08T13:23:34Z

90.224.111.43: /* Landscape and/or urban context */

'''Uggledal, Göteborg - Comprehensive Plan'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Göteborg''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sweden''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Andrew Butler''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="57.699745" lon="11.930466" type="satellite" zoom="11" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
The case study looks at the development of local forums for public participation in the process of detail planning and design within a new housing area, allowing an interchange of knowledge which facilitates improves outcomes. The project also illustrates how the “landscape” can function as an arena and focus points for communications relating to balancing growth issues with public needs.

=== Author's perspective ===
I come to this case study in the start of my PhD education. The subject I have chosen to study for the next 4 years relates to the inclusion of public perception within the analysis of the urban fringe landscape, this is mirrored in my case study
Over the subsequent 10 years I have studied and worked as a landscape architect and landscape planner, focusing on landscape analysis and trying to understand the multi faceted entity that is landscape and the meanings and values attached to ‘landscape’

Göteborg, Sweden’s second largest city with a population of 494 806 (Statistiska centralbyrån), lies on the country’s west coast.
Uggledal is situated in the south of the kommun forming an easily accessible suburb to the city. The area is comprised of new housing situated between the coast and the abrupt granite hills which dominate this area of Västra Gotaland county. It has been described by recent developers as “Housing area in harmony with nature”

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
Göteborg, Sweden’s second largest city with a population of 494 806 (Statistiska centralbyrån), lies on the country’s west coast.
Uggledal is situated in the south of the kommun forming an easily accessible suburb to the city. The area is comprised of new housing situated between the coast and the abrupt granite hills which dominate this area of Västra Gotaland county. It has been described by recent developers as “Housing area in harmony with nature”

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Participation]]
[[Category:Sweden]]
[[Category:Göteborg]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Uggledal

2008-12-08T13:22:52Z

90.224.111.43: /* Cultural/social/political context */

'''Uggledal, Göteborg - Comprehensive Plan'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''please enter the name here''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Göteborg''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Sweden''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Andrew Butler''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="57.699745" lon="11.930466" type="satellite" zoom="11" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===
The case study looks at the development of local forums for public participation in the process of detail planning and design within a new housing area, allowing an interchange of knowledge which facilitates improves outcomes. The project also illustrates how the “landscape” can function as an arena and focus points for communications relating to balancing growth issues with public needs.

=== Author's perspective ===
I come to this case study in the start of my PhD education. The subject I have chosen to study for the next 4 years relates to the inclusion of public perception within the analysis of the urban fringe landscape, this is mirrored in my case study
Over the subsequent 10 years I have studied and worked as a landscape architect and landscape planner, focusing on landscape analysis and trying to understand the multi faceted entity that is landscape and the meanings and values attached to ‘landscape’

=== Landscape and/or urban context===
*Biogeography, cultural features, overall character, history and dynamics

Illustration:
Map; sketches; short descriptive analyses

=== Cultural/social/political context===
Göteborg, Sweden’s second largest city with a population of 494 806 (Statistiska centralbyrån), lies on the country’s west coast.
Uggledal is situated in the south of the kommun forming an easily accessible suburb to the city. The area is comprised of new housing situated between the coast and the abrupt granite hills which dominate this area of Västra Gotaland county. It has been described by recent developers as “Housing area in harmony with nature”

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====
==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====
==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Participation]]
[[Category:Sweden]]
[[Category:Göteborg]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]
About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories